Four years since the landmark #Puttaswamy judgement, join us for a discussion on the future of your right to privacy in the wake of the #PegasusLeaks 👇🏽
Today, we're talking about the #PegasusProject reports. @MitaliLive will be speaking with @ShashiTharoor on what could be India's response to such an exposé — where are investigations headed, and how can we move ahead in India? #PrivacySupreme
Previously, the targets were human rights activists. However, the recent revelations indicate a wide range of targets — from opposition leaders and journalists to cabinet ministers!
The Indian government does have the power to surveil, monitor and decrypt communications — for certain specific interests (national security & others). But: the exercise of this power was restricted in an SC judgement back in 1996 — with details, a review committee, & time limit.
However when we talk about hacking, it is against the law under the #ITAct. This is why it's important for a judicial investigation into these serious reports. @ShashiTharoor#PrivacySupreme
Two important aspects around the future of our data privacy #PrivacySupreme 1. Data must belong to those who generate it. 2. We need an *independent* Data Protection Authority.
If you have questions, comment them on our YouTube stream! #PrivacySupreme
We're talking about the 2019 WhatsApp exploit by NSO right now! The #PegasusProject has simply added evidence to the already existing mountain of evidence on digital surveillance. #PrivacySupreme
Reports of NSO-led spyware attacks are still coming in, and there's no way it's a credible claim that the company does a human rights audit. The NSO continues to sell to illiberal, inhumane regimes. #PrivacySupreme
The pretense of safeguards by the NSO: we only sell to governments who only use it to investigate serious crimes. But what constitutes national security threats worthy of investigation? We've seen journalists, academics, research scientists framed as criminals. #PrivacySupreme
We (@citizenlab) have ample evidence of targeted espionage against civil society of India, starting from 2019 — and not all of them have gone public. It's not surprising — most countries around the world have very few safeguards around their intelligence agencies. #PrivacySupreme
Within a very short period of time (10-15 years), we've rushed headlong into an embrace of digital technologies. The problem is that the entire ecosystem on which all of this built is not secure *by design* - because of surveillance capitalism, and its consequent insecurities.
What we desperately need is a wholesale set of regulations on what governments and corporations can do with our data. The dark side of extensive data collection is causing serious harm. #PrivacySupreme
If you've got nothing to hide, do you still need to worry about privacy? It's a definite yes. Because authorities don't care if you have nothing to hide, what people are looking for is a loophole into exploitation - not just yours, but those close to you too. #PrivacySupreme
We *need* safeguards. We need institutions that can independently & safely verify that no abuse of power is taking place. That definitely isn't there in India, where there's recorded evidence of planted evidence — and that's what a disregard for privacy can lead to. #surveillance
In the case of India, there are so many cases of extensive surveillance. @Citizenlab was also involved in parsing through #BhimaKoregaon, and it's not just #Pegasus, but various other kinds of spyware/malware and the lack of safeguards. #PrivacySupreme
Looking back, #ArabSpring was an important turning point. Governments then went back and wondered, how can we stop this from ever happening again? They began tracking and hacking. #PrivacySupreme
Put in your questions for @RonDeibert! We'd love to have you in the digital conversation 👇🏽
The solution, whatever it may be, has to involve proper independent agencies. It may not be perfect, but we can't let perfect be the enemy of good. Democratic nations must set up proper agencies that are transparent and accountable to its people. #PrivacySupreme
Is there a figure to the global surveillance industry? Yes, public figures, BUT it's important to remember that many of these transactions take place in secret, with shell companies. However, what we can say is that: it's large, and it's growing. #PrivacySupreme
In India there's a line of thinking that says privacy is an "elitist" issue but... is it really? @anubhabhonsle asks @RonDeibert, and we end with a note on the importance of advocacy in this regard. #PrivacySupreme
Thank you everybody for tuning in to #PrivacySupreme 2021! Our work needs your continued support.
If you believe in your work and think our work matters, do consider becoming an IFF member today 🌟
Oftentimes when people’s data is breached, it’s probably because they haven’t implemented the basic digital hygiene that goes a long way in protecting your data.
There are some simple steps you can (and should!) take to up your #DigitalSecurity game. We might sound like a broken record, but:
🕸 Set up 2 Factor Authentication
🕸 Create strong passwords
🕸 Use a password manager
🕸 Stay alert for phishing scams!
More details in 🧵 👇🏽 2/n
First, on passwords:
✅ Use unique passwords for each account
❌ Don’t use: DOB, partner/parent’s names or any info easily available in the public domain.
✅ Aim for at least 15 characters & a mix of letters, numbers + symbols.
✅ Use passphrases: they are harder to crack. 3/n
Hearing Update: The petitions challenging the constitutionality of the #IntermediaryRules are listed for final hearing as item no. 44 before the bench led by the Chief Justice at the Madras High Court today. 1/n
IFF has provided legal assistance to carnatic musician, author and activist @tmkrishna in his petition challenging the entirety of the Rules. 2/n
The issues raised in these petitions are extremely important. We have sought that the entirety of the Intermediary Rules, 2021 be struck down because it violates the freedom of speech, freedom to practice any profession, and the right to privacy of individuals. 3/n
The #Agristack is a collection of technology based interventions in the farming and agriculture sector that hold the potential to result in dramatic changes. Get an introduction to the project & its potential benefits and drawbacks 👇🏽 2/n
The #Agristack project will include farmers':
- Personal details
- Land profile
- Production & financial details
Its issues mainly revolve around its algorithmic nature that can spike loan rates & reduce agency of farmers. The risk of exclusion is also present. 3/n
It was reported that for BPL & anthyodaya cardholders, vaccination was compulsory to receive benefits. In the face of outrage, the #Karnataka DC clarified that no such order was passed. While this immediate threat has diminished, we've seen multiple such statements recently. 2/n
In the present context of the COVID-19 pandemic, to deny people essential rations (or other government benefits) for being unvaccinated would only exacerbate the existing food and nutrition crisis.
IMPORTANT: Are such steps even legal? We broke it down for you. 🧵 3/n
Pegasus Update: Today, the Supreme Court will hear the petitions on #PegasusProject disclosures today. IFF has provided legal assistance to Jharkhand based activists @RupeshKSingh85 and @IpsaShatakshi, as well as support to other journalists and civil society members. 1/n
The issues raised in these petitions are extremely important. The petitioners have asked the court to declare that the use of the #Pegasus spyware is unconstitutional, and direct the Union Government to protect Indian citizens from this #spyware. 2/n
On the last date of hearing, the SC issued a pre-admission notice to the Central Government in these petitions. Prior to that, the Union Government had filed an affidavit that did not confirm or deny its use of Pegasus. 3/n
Short statement : The justification of the State of Haryana to impose an internet shutdown in Karnal on September 7 is incompatible with the Anuradha Bhasin Guidelines. The basis of an internet shutdown cannot be a vague apprehension of loss of life and property. 1/n
The order apprehends “disruption of public utilities and safety” and links it to the ability of the internet to “spread misinformation and rumours”. However, all these statements lack any factual basis such as specific inputs or past incidents. 2/n
Supreme Court has also at times held that the right to assembly and protest are democratic forms of dissent that must not be restrained. Hence there is a state duty to protect a protest and ensure its safety. Shutting down internet services does not advance state objectives. 3/n