the Taliban's main interests now are proving they can govern, and getting the US out ASAP for good. (hence the protection they've provided.)
for ISIS though, the chaos at #HKIA presented a golden opportunity to terrorize US troops, civilians, & undermine the Taliban all at once.
ISIS has been desperate for a high-profile attack to regain their 'prestige' & attract new recruits.
they'd been withering in recent years; their loss of territory starved them of revenue – they extract most of their money from locals + natural resources. & recruiting suffered.
still, 10,000+ ISIS fighters remain, and they've been awaiting an opening exactly like this.
the erosion of the caliphate & dwindling resources have (thankfully) thwarted their capacity to coordinate major overseas attacks, but they've still been incredibly dangerous locally.
of course we can't *trust* the Taliban – we knew that before Trump cut a deal for our near-unconditional retreat, and they still violated their terms.
but helping ISIS unleash hell in Kabul & kill US marines, days before we leave, would fly in the face of every Taliban interest.
in a sense, this is how we got into these catastrophic wars in the first place – by conflating distinct Islamic forces with distinct interests.
we conflated al-Qaeda and the Taliban; Afghanistan and Iraq; Sunni & Shia... it all became one rudderless, unwinnable "war on terror."
everything about today in Kabul – and the past week, the past 20 years, and what the future now holds – is gut-wrenching.
my heart is broken. I feel somehow so angry & so empty all at once.
please, let us stop repeating the same mistakes – the same senseless cycles of tragedy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
we have one novel proposal to add, which tackles the critical issue Amb. @SamanthaJPower highlights about misinfo going viral for hours before platforms act.
@SamanthaJPower VPP would subject posts about voting from high-reach accounts, with election integrity violations, to rapid human pre-screening.
those posts would publish as normal within 10 mins. *unless* they’re violative –– then they’d publish behind strong, click-thru warning labels. [2/5]
@SamanthaJPower there’s strong precedent for preemptive action to prevent harms both in traditional media –– where live broadcasts air with a short delay –– and in our democracy, where the VRA required preclearance for new voting laws from localities with a history of discrimination. [3/5]
NEW: @accountabletech just released a comprehensive Election Integrity Roadmap for social media platforms!
these are actionable proposals – rooted in platforms' existing policies, tools, & tech – to stem the worst vectors of election disinfo & incitement. accountabletech.org/wp-content/upl…
after many weeks of planning & conversations with (very patient) policy experts from across the spectrum, @NicoleLGill & I are launching @accountabletech: a new advocacy org dedicated to fighting online misinformation.
we are facing a crisis of truth –– one that poses an existential threat to the health of our society & democracy.
@accountabletech’s advocacy will focus on major social media platforms’ role in our current information ecosystem & the responsibilities that come with it. (2/5)
COVID-19 has led platforms to deploy new tools to combat dangerous misinformation, however inconsistently.
but it’s also underscored the structural flaws that plague these platforms & crystallized the real-world harms – all while heightening our dependence on technology. (3/5)
folks should really read all the exhibits from Rick Bright's whistleblower complaint.
Peter Navarro –– quoted in this story pretending Prestige Ameritech was the problem –– wrote multiple memos in Jan/Feb about the urgent need to onshore & ramp up domestic N95 mask production.
that time Ric Grenell baselessly accused Gold Star father Khizr Khan of entering the political fray solely to profit off his fallen son... mediaite.com/online/fox-con…
here's an op-ed Ric Grenell wrote in Oct. 2016 dismissing Russia's attack on our election & claiming Putin wouldn't prefer a certain candidate.