🧵 My @ScotNational column on the co-operation agreement & how to make its worthy aspirations meaningful. Both parties have signed up to “doing politics better” “constructively & respectfully” & with “transparency & candour” 1/12 thenational.scot/politics/19541…
If we are to have respectful politics & transparent processes, then these values must apply across the board. There can be no areas carved out where anything goes & people can be abused and traduced for seeking honest debate and scrutiny of policy. 2/12
So far, in relation to the most totemic and controversial legislation in their policy programme , the approach of the partners to the co-operation agreement hasn’t lived up to the values they have now so clearly set out in writing. 3/12
Like many people I support reform of the GRA to make it less traumatic for trans people to get a gender recognition certificate. This reflects the SNP manifesto commitment. What I, and many others, do not support is self-identification of sex for anyone. 4/12
This would negate the importance of sex in the legal protections afforded by the Equality Act, in the criminal justice system, in medical research and in many other important areas of public policy. 5/12
We are where we are now because “reform” has come to mean self-identification & self-identification has already been introduced by stealth in many areas of public life with anyone who questions it branded a bigot. This is no way to do reform or change. 6/12
Much of the vitriol and the shouting down of dissenting voices in the media, on social media and in our parliament is designed to prevent debate, because when light is shone on the proposals for self-identification of sex it becomes clear 7/12
that there are very real risks to hard-won rights to women-only spaces, to vulnerable women including those in prison and to the health of women, men, and indeed trans people, if sex disaggregated data is not collected. 8/12
We are now only days away from the publication of a legislative programme that will include a bill on GRA reform, but the responses made to the consultation on GRA reform carried out between December 2019 and March 2020 have yet to be published. 9/12
It’s not too late to reset the debate on this troubled issue. The consultation responses and the analysis of them which was commissioned last autumn & delivered in May of this year should be published without further delay. 10/12
Then we need to find a way to facilitate scrutiny & debate where the voices of all those affected by these reforms can be heard respectfully in line with the values espoused in the co-operation agreement. 11/12
So today I am renewing the call for a #CitizensAssembly which I first made 2 years ago. As this is wholly in keeping with the values of the co-operation agreement & shared policy programme I hope it will finally receive the consideration it deserves. 12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The summary of the #Forstater judgment by discrimination law expert @akuareindorf should be essential reading on the importance of belief as a protected characteristic not just for employers but for service providers & membership organisations 1/
Such organisations should review their policies to avoid the potential sanctioning of discrimination, harassment or victimisation on the grounds of protected beliefs on sex & gender & avoid compelled speech. Also a reminder that #freedomofexpression 2/7
And the right to #FreedomOfSpeech includes ‘not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome & the provocative provided it does not provoke violence’ 3/7
Here’s @thetimes view on what is a public & private sector scandal which could have significant legal implications for the feminists & lesbians who have been bullied to curry favour. thetimes.co.uk/article/the-ti…
.@TimesLucy has done a fantastic job of investigative journalism. She has revealed how
Documents show how the charity seeks to control what NHS trusts, Govt departments & local councils say on their social media accounts, demanding public support for its controversial views on gender identity, in return for points on its Top 100 Employers index
My thread on the criminal threats made against me on 1st February 2021 the day I was sacked from @theSNP Westminster front bench for as yet unspecified “behaviour”. scotsman.com/news/crime/you…
Grant Karte appeared at Edinburgh Sherriff Court this morning Friday 12 March and pled guilty to offences under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003
Some of the threats which Mr Karte made to me were of a sexual nature. A recent survey of parliamentarians showed that while politicians of both sexes receive abuse and threats, it is largely female politicians who receive threats of sexual violence.
The front page of today’s @heraldscotland wrongly states that I “am taking a defamation action against a Scots actor”. This is incorrect. There is no such action in court and I note the online version has been corrected to reflect this.
Article 10 of the ECHR (which is part of Scots law) protects the right to freedom of expression. It specifically states that the exercise of this right carries with it duties & responsibilities and may be subject to such restrictions or penalties as are
prescribed by law & are necessary in a democratic society. This is what permits us to legislate to criminalise hate speech & it is why individuals including MPs are entitled to take steps to protect their rights & reputations when people tell lies about them
A thread on the newly announced @theSNP Roadmap to Referendum which I have seen for first time today & am studying carefully 👇
I’m pleased that ideas previously advanced by me & others are being pursued & I hope all @theSNP members will now unite around the recognition that we need a Plan B, by which I mean a strategy which does not rely on Westminster granting a section 30 order
However, I have many questions about the detail of this new strategy, which I have seen for the first time today, and the proposed timetable, and I intend to pursue these questions at tomorrow’s SNP national assembly
I’m used to nasty hatchet jobs on me. Its been a particular feature of my experience in politics. Often they come from a position of ignorance from those who have never spoken with me & wish to distort something I’ve said by taking it wholly out of context
Today’s piece in the Herald is fairly . Typical. Perhaps Mr Smith didn’t read or understand my original column? heraldscotland.com/news/19000771.…
Fortunately the Irish Times did & here’s their piece. Typical of the consistently high quality of their journalism irishtimes.com/news/ireland/i…