@autismcrisis My thoughts about this PDA systematic review.
I note that the systematic review is going quite broad in terms of searches and search terms. I suspect some would challenge the search terms for not referring directly to PDA, as in they are not names for it.
@autismcrisis The results are going to be biased by the campaigning to have PDA recognised as an ASD, both in terms of the research conducted, broader stakeholder opinions.
@autismcrisis Then there will have issues that demand-avoidance is a generic process, that its features are seen commonly in the human population. Not all of the features in various PDA behaviour profiles cluster with demand-avoidance features.
@autismcrisis There are conceptual issues with viewing demand-avoidance as caused by deficits. it locates the issues within the person, when it is a transactional process...
@autismcrisis ... There are good reasons why I am currently viewing PDA to be about stress-management and as a form of OCD & Related Disorders ...
@autismcrisis ... (if only temporarily - I think PDA is a new type of Disorder, that can be placed within a new diagnostic grouping, which OCD & Related Disorders is).
@autismcrisis Then there are other issues like is social avoidance behaviours strategic or manipulative, in my view they are on a continuum of "strategic" at one end, to "manipulative" at the other.
@autismcrisis Many of Newson's Surface Sociability trait features either do not reliably measure their deficits, or are actually anxiety-based RRBIs, like panic attacks.
@autismcrisis There are huge problems with a descriptor in NICE guidelines CG128 for demand avoidance behaviours, as it is just extreme responses to other requests, such as it also includes lability of mood features and also trauma responses.
@autismcrisis Generally, PDA is an ASD literature avoids mentioning anything mildly problematic, such as the first critical PDA article, Garralda (2003) is rarely referenced, despite it making important contributions to it!
@autismcrisis This systematic review should notice many flaws in the current literature, and much disagreement, I doubt one can draw much firm conclusions from it about the nature of PDA.
@autismcrisis "Perspectives on pathological demand avoidance: A meta-study analysis and synthesis of qualitative literature."
@autismcrisis Oh there will also be issues due to disagreements over what traits are present in PDA behaviour profile, diagnostic & if PDA is specific to autism or not.
@autismcrisis This SR should provide interesting results about the debates surrounding PDA, but it is all it should really do.
While I am sympathetic & support the notion of boycotting #StopSpectrum10K, reading it raises more questions than answers for me. So Aucademy is meant to be involved with this.
The statement acknowledges issues dividing autism & makes points I agree with on the topic.
Yet Aucademy platforms PDA is an ASD supporters, i.e., persons which view PDA as a subgroup/ subtype.
"Which option leads me to act like the kind of person I want to be?"
Embraces good practice inclusive scientific-method based: theory, research, & practice. Advocating for all autistic persons are adequately supported.
Social model neurodiversity supporter.
Which in relation to PDA, is either it is a separate Disorder/ "diagnostic entity" from autism. Or, PDA's features are attributed to accepted constructs, like anxiety, ADHD etc, that informs support packages.
The principles about advocating for autistic persons support needs being adequately recognised, are also applicable to non-autistic persons with various ways of being/ "disorders"/ "conditions".
@noellevivante Potentially disregarding a minority groups wishes is something I have been reflecting upon recently due to my own research & how some autistic persons strongly view they have extra rights because they identify with PDA.
@noellevivante First point, just because some persons think PDA is an ASD, & strongly identify with it, does not automatically grant them extra rights. One only has to look at perspective taken in recent systematic review, BPS & NICE to see that.
@noellevivante Some would argue that PDA gives them extra rights under "biological citizenship", & it is from birth. There is good case PDA does not have to be developmental in nature, & is probably caused by trauma/ aversive events.
I will see what #PDASpace response to the email is before deciding if it needs to be added as another example of "PDA is an ASD" community not changing its position, i.e., being dogmatic.
Anyone want to take odds @PDASociety will be adding another example of "PDA is an ASD" supporters being dogmatic with its imminent monthly newsletter?
I sure hope the "PDA is an ASD" community is avoiding Spectrum10K like it avoids critical opinion, i.e., avoiding the demand to take part & provide genetic data to try & find subgroups.
The reason for this should be obvious, if they are looking to try fix, or erase autistic persons for not being "able" or productive in society. Any belonging to a group with "Pathological/ Extreme Demand Avoidance is highly likely to be near top of that list.
This makes sense when one considers that PDA as a construct is fundamentally based on non-compliance to non-autistic social norms, with often has extreme, socially outrageous, "challenging behaviour" to others requests.
Simply put. Why the **** are the likes of @PDASociety@Autism making the stupid decision to view PDA as an anxiety based disorder within the autism spectrum?
I know the logic & reasons why people often view to be an anxiety-based disorder within the autism spectrum. If we can critique Spectrum10k for autism not being an anxiety/ panic disorder. Same point is equally applicable to PDA!
I have had enough of the nonsense around PDA, the seemingly systemic poor quality, research, theory & practice associated with PDA is an ASD. The lack disclosure of conflict interests. The lack of transparency of the PDA Development Group.