I'm still digesting what is Joe Biden's most important speech, marking a new direction for US foreign policy.
His most crucial words: "This decision about Afghanistan is not just about Afghanistan, it’s about ending an era of major military operations to remake other countries."
Two decades, so many lives, & $2 trillion later, it is essential that we rethink US foreign policy & end the delusion of nation building.
The people who brought us "nation building" are the same people who led us into the Iraq disaster, which now stands as the fulcrum for ISIS. And they are the same people responsible for the mission creep counter-insurgency that cost us 20 years in the graveyard of empires.
But the Biden Doctrine outlined in this speech does not resort to isolationism or populist/nationalism. He comprehends that terrorism is still a threat-but that it has metastasized & dispersed across the world well beyond Afghanistan-to the Sahel & Somalia in Africa, C Asia etc.
The Biden Doctrine is a more agile & dynamic approach to defending & protecting America, not, as he says, "against threats of 2001, but against the threats of 2021 & tomorrow." It is a forward-looking approach to nation security & frankly, I've been waiting decades to hear this.
Biden asserts "we must stay clearly focused on the fundamental national security interests of the United States of America." In this way, there remains an internationalist orientation of the Biden Doctrine, with regard to threats AND diplomacy, humanitarian aid & competitiveness.
For yrs, I waited for an American president to dispense with trickle down/supplyside economics. Biden did that. I also waited for a US president to signal a departure from failed foreign policy. Biden did that today. The Biden Doctrine is a new way of engaging with the world.
And frankly, after 20 years in Afghanistan, we need a new way of engaging in the world. Moreover, after Jan 6, it seems ludicrous that we try to export nation building and Jeffersonian democracy abroad, when our own democracy at home seems so fragile. /end
Everyone who declared themselves an Afghanistan expert less than a month ago is silent today as the last Afghan resistance stronghold in #Panjshir is under heavy aerial heavy bombardment by the Taliban, aided by Pakistan.
On the ground in #Panjshir, Ahmad Massoud's close aide, Mohammad Fahim Dashty, died in battle as the Northern Alliance Resistance Force fought the Taliban.
With Ghani gone, VP Amrullah Saleh declared himself to be the democratically-elected leader & has been hold up in #PanjshirValley - the last resistance stronghold - now under attack. Saleh is calling on the UN to intervene to stop the burgeoning genocide.
#SB8 is an almost a complete ban on abortion in TX because 90% of procedures happen after the 6th week of pregnancy. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. PLUS there is a $10k bounty on anyone who helps a woman get an abortion. nytimes.com/2021/09/01/us/…
This is the legal blueprint that could well be adopted in other red states, taking us to an effective ban on abortions in such jurisdictions.
The Handmaid's Tale was supposed to be a cautionary tale and not an operational manual.
We're going into a dark place where abortions in Texas won't go away... we'll just return to unsafe abortion situations, especially for poor women. We are going to a place where clinics and abortion workers are intimidated. It is literally unsafe to be in a red state.
It is very clear that many in the warmonger reporting caucus are openly mourning the end of neocon forever wars. This is not accidental. There is the obvious psychological effect of reporting from forever war zones for 20 yrs. One of those effects is becoming part of the story.
But that's only part of the explanation. We've talked a lot here on Twitter about the toxic effect of the Habermanian-style of access journalism. But there is also military-embed journalism that we have been witness to for 20 years that is also toxic.
From the Afghan & Iraq wars onward, we had military-embed journalists becoming part of the story. But even the anchors in studios were cheerleading the ill-advised debacle in Iraq. I'm sorry to say i am old enough to remember the horror of warmonger journalism in the early 2000s.
"This has been a massive military, diplomatic, and humanitarian undertaking, one of the most difficult in our nation's history, and an extraordinary feat of logistics and coordination under some of the most challenging circumstances imaginable" -- @SecBlinken
Sec Blinken confirms that the military engagement in Afghanistan is over and the diplomatic endeavor begins. The embassy moves to a post in Doha & the effort continues to help Americans & Afghans evacuate under the aegis of the State Dept.
Sec Blinken notes that there is no deadline to this commitment. He references Taliban assertion that it will allow people to leave who want to, and says they will hold the Taliban accountable.
I am just going to subtweet my absolute disgust for the neocons, the Nat Sec elites, the Blob, & the rest of the foreign policy flunkies whose failed notions brought us to this moment 20 years later. You are the LAST people who should be talking right now. Sit this one out.
And as for the media, who keeps inviting these flunkies on cable tv or giving them room on their pages to write op eds (Economist, I am looking at you for that SHIT from Kissinger): You are accomplices to this folly.
At the core is a nationalist mythology of American exceptionalism-that there is no problem that US intervention can't fix. That mythology is cross-cut by an ethos of entitled hegemony. The Afghan exit upends those notions, sparking resulting rage from the Nat Sec establishment.