1) They r playing innocent kids caught stealing the pie in making evacuation fiasco the whole issue: while the issue is that US poisoned the whole subcontinent to poison Russia, and then fled without cleaning up their poison. This is what Biden admin shd be marked for, forever.
2) the evacuation failures are an operational issue, as obviously not planned well in advance, not thought out for consequences and possible knowingly ignoring ground intel or more maliciously, preventing proper response because of hidden objectives.
3) However, this is a smaller fault, a fault of ignorance - which is unbelievable as an excuse for the level of intel US collects, or a fault of cynical ideological and shortsighted real-politik biases without thinking of long term consequences or concern for even "friends".
4) the real and unforgivable fault was US funding and arming of Deobandi Islamist Pashtuns into Talebs in Pashtun areas of Pakistan, in order to bleed Russia in Afghanistan and overthrow a leftist (or what leftism can be at most in a mullah dominated society) Afghan gov.
5) I hv been a staunch anticommunist from my teenage years, yet I remember myself the lone voice protesting my classmates weird glee at Taleban sweeping to power. For me, it wd be best to leave the "reds" and mullahs wear each other out, but not letting mullahs gain more power.
6) Nowhere in any well-entrenched mullah society, commies succeeded. What happened though, in places, was a kind of compromise "pseudo-socialism" (ex the more leftie baath of Egypt or Assad's daddy compared to west backed Baath thugs like Saddam) that allowed some modernization.
7) where the "Muslim left" didnt succeed, was due to circumstantial or greater success of UK/USA's interventions to subvert/overthrow communist attempts for power in the Islamic world, like Iran and Iraq, through coups in Iraq, or promotion of Islamists and jihadists like in Iran
8) one self-imposed constraint of Left is certain elements of "modernization" that they copy out of European modernization - that also includes as a side effect of women's education and public rights - which is a great blow towards mullah grasp over society.
9) while commies not in total state power, as in WB, or India, inevitably try to recruit Islamists as a disruptive force against state, when they come to total state power as in USSR or China - they make war on mullahs. The two totalitarians correctly see each other as rivals.
10) For me, US shd just hv let Russia fight the mullahs - over time it wd have exhausted both, but created a space where education cd replace parts of old ideology, combined with carrot and sticks of gov, and over two generations significantly weakened the mullahs.
11) Russia wd hv had to leave eventually, and US knew Russia's economy had begun to stagnate from late 60's. Its industrial and scientific community no longer enjoyed the merito-cracy of earlier days, instead slid back into the mediocracy and thuggery of nepotistic apparatchiks.
12) But we wd hv by this time, a substantial social base that wd hv an incentive to hold onto their goodies, and therefore fight - perhaps even quite ruthlessly as is seen elsehwere, and neither wd global jihad nor the evacuation drama wd be needed.
13) having destroyed that chance of modernization of Afg, US is responsible for the empowerment of the mullah to the point of unrivaled dominance and creating a base for transnational jihad. Biden can't hide behind Trump as he had zero hesitation in reversing Trumps "policies".
14) Biden left without destroying the infrastructure of transnational jihad, both the ideological as well as material infrastructure. That is what the crucial issue is - not the mere evacuation rigmarole.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A bemused take on the place-identity link to claims of social status. Sometimes its a compensation of a hidden sense of inferiority. This manifests in Islamic attempt at erasing pre-Islamic cultures they raided by renaming their places outsideonline.com/culture/essays…
But the sense of inherent inferiority complex becomes obvious in Islamic attempt at denying that the places they raided had a distinct geography and place-linked culture and tried to impose their "home-place" identity by name alone or by destroying pre-existing cultural symbols.
It showed that they actually found their festishized "home-place" inferior in things that they desired, so that they didnt return to that cherished superior home-place rather occupied the territories they feigned to look down upon. To compensate, home-place had to be eulogised.
@abhivaarta@Aban__Ind@bidesh_desh@From_Himalaya What is really the issue here? will everyone be happy if its said, no no all mollahs in Bengal are converted indigenous Bong Hindus or Bong Buddhists and a proof of how bad Bong hindus are? Muslim "migration into Bengal" was a hot topic in Pakistanyat campaign days.
@abhivaarta@Aban__Ind@bidesh_desh@From_Himalaya Migration will be as difficult to "give source material" on, just as even the so-called contemporary Mughlai censuses have not been handed down in their "sources", and summaries still led to at least 4 different estimates of population numbers, forget demographic details.
@abhivaarta@Aban__Ind@bidesh_desh@From_Himalaya The few studies primarily agree that it was scum Mughlai consolidation in Bengal that coincides with relatively rapid growth in Muslim mumbers in Bengal, but even then after scum Brit advent, the early Brit censuses don't show mullah majority.
1) Poignant reminder as to how hypocrisy is the inevitable solution to hiding real motives in a way that doesn’t allow others apply the same methods. West achieved what it wanted for Afghanistan and left it exactly as it had always wanted: under totalitarian grasp of mullahcracy.
2)Biden and others may whine that they didn’t want regime change: no they still do and will continue to try and change regimes that don’t suit their long term plans for division of world into zones of socio-economic and military spheres of dominance.
3) what they wanted to change in Afghanistan was prevent modernisation and prevent weakening of the Islamist infrastructure in that fatal blindfold of Atlanticist fratricidal obsession with bringing Russia down (while Russ desperately sought to be European and not Asian).
1) all self proclaimed “activists ag Islamophobia” absorb lying and imagining history from jihadi toolkit: but this one pretends that Pakistan does not “occupy” parts of “Kashmir”. For him Pak is not occupier as it’s Islamist. But his history is as funny as Islamist chronicles.
2) if only he had stuck to gloating on US he cd hv got away with it, but he had to step into 19th c. France “ending” with 1903 and Vietnam in 1975. He carefully forgot end of illegal and military British occupation of many parts of the world including India in the same century.
3) in each of his itches ag US, he carefully forgets that unlike Brits, US didnt impose an US gov in Iraq, Vietnam, AFG. In each case it went in on invitation of a “native” gov against a regional adversary. It was NVietnam which mounted an invasion of an independent neighbour.