Speers seems unaware that the vast majority of sex offenders are known to their victims #QandA
discussion of vague random fears about internet sex offenders are a safe place for white male journalists and pleece.
apparently we are going to talk about housing later. Sure, David. In fact, safe affordable housing for women and children, with income security and counselling and legal support, is what we need. Women can take it from there thanks.
what Speers and Reece will never concede - so they are wholly unfit for purpose here - is that their equivocation and obscurantism and normalisation are a massive part of the problem.
they can not even name colonialism and patriarchy, the central organising systems of our society. This shitshow is worse than useless. It creates the false impression that our federal government gives a flying fuck about women and children, anywhere, here or there. They don’t.
lmao a mediocre white male claiming that women “earn” less than men. No, David. Women work much harder than males mate. We ARE PAID less than men. The reason is that patriarchy refuses to value what women do. You’re welcome.
honestly. He knows exactly nothing about male violence. Or colonial violence. Or homelessness. Poverty. Nothing. And he is hosting a show on the public broadcaster on the things he knows exactly nothing about. Hello, imperial white patriarchy. This is how you operate.
here’s a tip, men. Stop being violent.
Grace Tame: sexism is taught👏🏼👏🏼
regular reminder that patriarchy is 6-10,000 years old. Colonial violence is upwards of 500 years old. But here. Where we live. An incredible fact: patriarchy and colonial violence have only been here for 250 years.
now Speers is all over the airwaves like a cheap suit telling ABC radio hosts “what really matters is the new national plan”. Why? Male violence has skyrocketed during the current “national plan to reduce violence against women and children”, making it an unmitigated failure.
maybe producing national plans to “reduce [agentless, generic] violence against women and children” does more to keep men like Speers and Morrison in their cushy, overpaid jobs than to stop men being violent against women and children.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
in case #Insiders forgets to devote as much time to catastrophic failures by the NSW government as it did to a speech by the Queensland premier last week, a brief overview: Berejiklian has lost control of the people in eastern Sydney and of the virus in western Sydney.
good morning from unceded Darug lands☀️today on #Insiders are former Liberal Party staffer and 9fax columnist Niki Savva; Ch 10 co-host and columnist Waleed Aly; Guardian politics corro Sarah Martin.
Interview is with shadow minister for education and for women, Tanya Plibersek.
opening spiel: NSW unveils it’s plan to re-open. It is “high stakes” - for some - and the prime minister is cheering the premier on. Other states are anxious. #Insiders
Q: why are people dying of covid at home without being diagnosed?
Hazzard: there are people in large households who want (sic) to go on earning income.
exactly no detail on how to access your become support. The state and federal governments have set up income supports, says Hazzard, and defaults back to blaming people on low incomes in large households.
the NSW government, which has completely failed to control this outbreak, is essentially accusing low income workers in large households of killing their family members by providing for their families.
“many were surprised by her decision” goodness where is that devotion to conflict journalism now.
please do not link me to the newscorp headline. I have seen that clickbait. It will evaporate inside 24 hours.
I had no idea polling shows that approval of Berejiklian is below 50% but fondly* recall lengthy journalistic discussion about a pandemic incumbency dividend when Labor Premiers Palasczuzk and McGowan romped back in and Liberal Party Premier Gutwein just scraped back.
the re-opening of NSW is being run by a woman who does not distinguish essential retail outlets from entertainment venues.
it is her personal choice not to associate with anyone who is not fully vaccinated, which is a thing wealthy people in wealthy areas with unessential jobs can do so that’s nice for her.
handouts to business from the good people of NSW are being touted again today. These are direct vote-buying measures for the Liberal Party base. Meanwhile, the life-saving measures of test-and-isolate payments and ambulance fee waivers for covid patients are NEVER EVER mentioned.
look. Morrison is talking about us, not to us. His summit speech and subsequent campaign comms on it are addressed to males who only need to be told he is doing something for the little laydeez mate, to maintain false “good bloke” self-image and their precious votes.
there is no affordable housing strategy; no serious attempt at law reform; he has legislative amendments designed to HARM single mums before the parliament. This summit tells his misogynist base he is “doing something” about the laydeez. They then go jeez what more do women want.
the vicious Morrison government attacks on single mums, which force women and children to stay in households with violent males and deliberately make income insecurity even worse, are contained in the Social Security* Amendment Bill analysed by Asher Wolf here: