I will speak for my own tweeting on this. It was clearly specified that this was the independent expert panel convened by WHO. It was never alluded to as a WHO recommendation. However, why did @WHOSriLanka take down the reports?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This long thread is about Imaad Zuberi who in June this year went to jail in the US for defrauding #SriLanka out of nearly US$6mn. The money was disbursed through @CBSL in 2014. Those that paid were never held accountable. And it’s not just US$6mn we’re talking about.
@TimesOnlineLK first reported in a July 2014 political column that Zuberi was introduced to UPFA leaders by Saleem H Mandviwalla, a one-time Chairman of Pakistan's Board of Investment, friend of President Rajapaksa and Namal Rajapaksa MP. sundaytimes.lk/140720/columns…
On July 20, @TimesOnlineLK political column revealed that Vass Gunawardena was doing back-channel diplomacy to cushion possible adverse fallout from an international investigation into alleged war crimes. Again, Zuberi was key. sundaytimes.lk/140810/columns…
@WHOSriLanka had been convening an independent expert panel--which included members attached to the WHO--to assess #COVID19 in Sri Lanka. They produced reports which were easy to understand, scientific and provided a snapshot into the prevailing situation around the time. (1)
At least two reports were published online. I am among the professional journalists (also my colleague at @TimesOnlineLK) who took extracts from the report while identifying CORRECTLY that it was an independent panel convened by @WHOSriLanka (2)
The reports did specify that lockdowns would save lives. This was the opinion of the experts in the panel. The media duly reported it, ALONG with other facts contained therein. (3)