1) The science is now highly contested with respect to the vaccination strategy being pursued. On the scientific controversies see, for example, @hartgroup_org@collateralglbl@PanData19 and a useful recent interview here with @RWMaloneMD:-
2) Leading independent researchers such as @elleprovocateur and @_whitneywebb have made clear that there are political agendas (e.g. @wef, great reset, 4IR etc) underlying the COVID-19 event. These are being ushered through with no democratic scrutiny.
3) The financial resetting we are likely to see will involve vaccine passports leading to digital currency, central bank control & potentially a social credit system (see China) and with it tremendous centralisation of power. See here for analysis:- ukcolumn.org/video/doctors-…
5) And the @ALCU decision appears oblivious to the unprecedented levels of propaganda used during the COVID-19 event all aimed at underpinning the draconian responses we are seeing:- rumble.com/vkppo0-covid-i…
6) And see @BareReality's excellent State of Fear:-
7) The @alcu is at best blindly propagandising for these processes through a moralistic narrative which, as @MaxBlumenthal describes, is akin to the the R2P doctrine we have seen used to promote 20 plus years of 'humanitarian' war; @Fiorella_im@yopasta:-
8) and, finally, for an analysis that brings together all these elements -propaganda/corrupted science, political and financial reset-, as well as the possibilities for resistance, see @wolff_ernst talk-
Again @Tom_H_Wright misleads the public. In fact, the central issue with the @opcw/Douma issue relates to the obfuscation and suppression of evidence by the @OPCW:- @ClarkeMicah@aaronjmate
2) But he ignores the suppressed original interim report and the sidelined leaked analysis provided by an OPCW inspector which identified the inconsistency between the damage observed on the cylinders and the impact damage. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…@CL4Syr
1) Wright attempts to downplay the recent ruling that Mayday breached BBC editorial standards by insinuating, without evidence, that an OPCW whistleblower was motivated by financial gain. @ClarkeMicah@bbclysedoucet@NikGowing:-
2) The producers of Mayday are also unable to evidence their claim that the final OPCW report on Douma took seriously the idea that the alleged chemical attack in Douma did not occur:- 'they discussed it as a scenario and tested their evidence against the possibility'
Leading voice of 'the left' advocates discrimination and medical apartheid whilst demonstrating minimal awareness of the now well-established scientific controversies regarding draconian COVID-19 policies and vaccination. @hartgroup_org@PanData19@RWMaloneMD@MartinKulldorff
Smears and attacks are what the powerful use when they cannot win through democratic and rational argument. They are tools in their propaganda arsenal. Never before have we seen such widespread use of these against scientists and professionals @pcrclaims@hartgroup_org
@BTudbubble@RealScottRitter@MaxBlumenthal The reality is that a very large number of scientists and professionals now make clear that lockdown/coercive measures etc/mass vaccination are wrong/flawed. See here for the latest of professionals speaking out:
1) It is not a matter of dispute that the subject matter of the working group syriapropagandamedia.org is *well established* and *legitimate*; for example, ...
2) ... it is no longer seriously disputed that the UK & US have been involved in a so-called *dirty war* aimed at overthrowing the Syrian government. Professor Sachs makes clear the illegality of this policy in this @MSNBC interview:- @KevorkAlmassian