Again @Tom_H_Wright misleads the public. In fact, the central issue with the @opcw/Douma issue relates to the obfuscation and suppression of evidence by the @opcw:- @ClarkeMicah@aaronjmate
2) But he ignores the suppressed original interim report and the sidelined leaked analysis provided by an OPCW inspector which identified the inconsistency between the damage observed on the cylinders and the impact damage. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…@CL4Syr
3) At location 2, for example, the bent rebars, bent through greater than 90 degrees (see right above) cannot be explained by the cylinder which had been stopped by a rebar; nor can the lack of indentation on the cylinder head be explained.
4) It was also noted in the suppressed/sidelined original reports that no explanation could be established for the remarkable sideways bouncing cylinder at location 4.
5) The Final OPCW report refers to 3 independent experts but provides no substantial analysis, simply asserting the following:
6) The final report also fails to provide an analysis to explain the sideways bounce at location 4, instead glibly stating the following whilst providing a graph that does not explain the bounce:-
7) Wright suggests that the OPCW final report confirmed the presence of chlorine gas:
8) but pays no attention to the very specific issues raised by the OPCW inspector, still unaddressed by the @opcw, regarding the mismanagement of the chemical analysis: berlingroup21.org/background
9) Wright refers to toxicology evidence and the deceased at location 2:
10) This is again misleading. The original toxically report (suppressed) by 4 NATO CW experts concluded that chlorine gas was not the cause of death for these victims. This is ignored by Wright. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
11) Both the sidelined Douma team inspectors and the NATO toxicologists were clear that the deaths of these civilians, gathered in piles, was not consistent with chlorine gas (the scene was actually more indicative of a nerve agent [which was never found]) @MichaKobs
12) Wright refers to witness testimony as part of the OPCW's body of evidence supporting the conclusion that the alleged attack occurred:
13) In doing so Wright omits the fact that witness testimony diverged whilst the OPCW final report obfuscated this fact. Note in the right hand clip witness testimony linked to white helmets supplied witnesses reports symptoms associated with nerve agent (no nerveagent was found)
14) In sum, @Tom_H_Wright, @bbc and @chloehadj have chosen to censor clear and documented scientific/procedural flaws w.r.t. the Douma investigation and, instead attempted to smear a scientist by insinuating financial motives
15) As such, they are continuing a sustained smear campaign against anyone asking questions about Douma, a campaign which started the day the US, UK and France bombed Syria having accused it of carrying out the Douma attack. @MaxAbrahms@GarethPorter@johnpilger@RossAshcroft
For those wishing to understand better the political and economic agendas that are driving/underlying the current COVID-19 lockdown/mass vaccination/coercion strategies, some weekend viewing and reading:- odysee.com/@LongXXvids:c/…
1) Wright attempts to downplay the recent ruling that Mayday breached BBC editorial standards by insinuating, without evidence, that an OPCW whistleblower was motivated by financial gain. @ClarkeMicah@bbclysedoucet@NikGowing:-
2) The producers of Mayday are also unable to evidence their claim that the final OPCW report on Douma took seriously the idea that the alleged chemical attack in Douma did not occur:- 'they discussed it as a scenario and tested their evidence against the possibility'
1) The science is now highly contested with respect to the vaccination strategy being pursued. On the scientific controversies see, for example, @hartgroup_org@collateralglbl@PanData19 and a useful recent interview here with @RWMaloneMD:-
2) Leading independent researchers such as @elleprovocateur and @_whitneywebb have made clear that there are political agendas (e.g. @wef, great reset, 4IR etc) underlying the COVID-19 event. These are being ushered through with no democratic scrutiny.
Leading voice of 'the left' advocates discrimination and medical apartheid whilst demonstrating minimal awareness of the now well-established scientific controversies regarding draconian COVID-19 policies and vaccination. @hartgroup_org@PanData19@RWMaloneMD@MartinKulldorff
Smears and attacks are what the powerful use when they cannot win through democratic and rational argument. They are tools in their propaganda arsenal. Never before have we seen such widespread use of these against scientists and professionals @pcrclaims@hartgroup_org
@BTudbubble@RealScottRitter@MaxBlumenthal The reality is that a very large number of scientists and professionals now make clear that lockdown/coercive measures etc/mass vaccination are wrong/flawed. See here for the latest of professionals speaking out: