1/ A thread about Harvard referencing style. My message for students is always use whatever Harvard style you like just use it consistently. What I've realised is that students struggle with the consistently bit because they haven't been taught where the choices are. So here's a
2/ thread on some of these choices. First up Harvard is a generic style where you cite author name(s) + publication date in the main text & then have a separate list of references at the end. There are lots of different versions of Harvard - APA, lots of unis have their own
3/ many publishers have their own Harvard house style... so Harvard & APA are not different styles. APA is Harvard! Okay so in the main text you typically cite the author last name & publication date. Eg (Braun & Clarke, 2006)... Different versions of Harvard give you different
4/ options for formatting this - these are seriously pedantic! Do you have a comma after the author name & before the date or not? (Braun 2006) or (Braun, 2006)

If 2 authors do you use and or an ampersand (Braun & Clarke, 2006) or (Braun and Clarke, 2006)?

If 3 or more authors
5/ Say hello to et al. an abbreviation of et alia (meaning and all). Do you have a full stop after al or not? Or do you spell out alia in full (rare but not unheard of!)?

If you're quoting from a source & need to cite page numbers there are so many options for formatting these!
6/ (Braun & Clarke, 2006: 74) or (Braun & Clarke, 2006, p. 74) are probably the most widely used (so a colon or p. with p=page), but there are others (eg in an adverse to punctuation style Braun and Clarke 2006 p 74). In the reference list itself there are even more choices.
7/ Comma after the author name or not? Full stop after the initials or not? If 2+ initials a space between them or not? Braun, V or Braun V? Braun, V. or Braun, V? Braun, V.V. or Braun, V. V.? In a reference with 2 authors a comma after the first author or not? Braun, V., or
8/ Braun, V.? Then there's the familiar choice between and or &. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. or Braun, V. and Clarke, V.? Then you have the publication date - in brackets or not? Followed by a full stop or not? Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). or Braun V and Clarke V 2006? Now the
9/ title - all CAPS or not? CAPS on the title but not the subtitle? CAPS on first word in the title and subtitle? Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology or Using thematic analysis in psychology for eg? At the end of the title a full stop or a comma? Or nothing... It's unusual for
10/ the journal title not to be all CAPS. If there's a and/& in the title - make sure you have this right as these aren't interchangeable. So we're all CAPS for the journal title - but is it bold, italics or plain text? Abbreviated or not? Let's go with Qualitative Research in
11/ Psychology... after the journal title is there a comma or not? Next is the volume number. This can be followed by the issue number eg 3(1) You must have an issue no if the page numbers for each issue start at 0. If they run on from the previous issue (in a vol) the issue no
12/ isn't crucial but may still be preferred in some versions of Harvard. There's also variation in how the vol and issue no are formatted 3(1) or 3:1 are two common options. Do you have a comma after the vol/issue number? Finally how do you format the page span? There are so
13/ many options! 3(1), pp. 274-285 (pp = page to page) and 3(1): 274-285 are two of many possibilities. So the point of this thread isn't to provide a definitive guide to a style but to highlight where there can be variation in formatting. This variation can be hard to grasp...
14/ but when I say to my students be consistent what I'm hoping for is they spot how their chosen version of Harvard makes these decisions. Hopefully if you know whether there's a full stop after the date in the reference list it's a bit easier to check/proof read for this. I
15/ realise of course this is easier for some than others and pretty impossible for some...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Victoria Clarke 🦄

Victoria Clarke 🦄 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvicclarke

2 Sep
1/ Themes don't emerge but themes can be emergent?! What? Eh? A quick thread on the differences between emerge(d) & emergent. @ginnybraun & I bang on about themes not emerging. We are critical of the phrase "3 themes emerged..." etc for 2 reasons. First, it can imply themes are
2/ ontologically real things that exist in data independent of a researcher's engagement with the data. If themes are real the researcher's role becomes one of extraction or discovery. In our reflexive TA approach themes aren't real! They're not in data fully formed. Instead,
3/ themes are generated by the researcher through their interpretative engagement with data - created from codes & through coding. Second, "the themes emerged" can imply the researcher is passive in the theme development process when they are anything but. At the same time the
Read 6 tweets
3 Jul
1/ @ginnybraun & I have written a lot about TA since our first paper Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology in 2006. Here's a thread of things we have written since then, starting with a paper on what constitutes quality practice in TA & 10 common problems: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
2/ Unsure if TA is the right method for your project? And when & why you'd use TA & not IPA, or qualitative content analysis or grounded theory or discourse analysis... then this paper is for you (free to read online right now): onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.10…
3/ One of the hallmarks of TA is its flexibility but this also means there are a lot of decisions to be made about the conceptualisation & design of your project. Our most recent paper - a beast! - walks you through these decisions & has tips on reporting: psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi…
Read 35 tweets
1 Jun
1/ A thread on why I think collecting demographic data is important in qualitative research (& research more broadly) & a request for your thoughts on this. Am I alone in thinking this is important? I seem to be... based on experiences of ethics scrutiny this yr #AcademicChatter
2/ I get the sense that some researchers - esp those researching students - implicitly imagine their potential participants as the "usual suspects" (white, straight, nondisabled, middle class etc)... I've scrutinised several studies where disability (cog fog etc) would confound
3/ the quant results but no exclusion criteria & no demographics - I don't get it?! I've been told by white male students more than once that if for eg race/ethnicity aren't relevant to the research question there is no need to collect demog data on ethnicity. But as a white
Read 17 tweets
28 May
1/ A thread with some tips on writing qualitative research dissertations - esp those using thematic analysis - including common problems to avoid (prompted by marking student projects). First tip - as @ginnybraun & I always say check local requirements! Broadly speaking, there
2/ are two styles of qual research reporting: 1) "add qual and stir" - default quant conventions slightly tweaked for qual: finding & filling the "gap" introduction & rationale, methodological critique of existing studies, separate "results" & discussion... 2) qual centric. The
3/ latter is far less well understood & recognised - I've had reviewers/editors insist on me reworking qual centric reports into something more conventional, examiners do the same to my students. So check what is required in your context. If a marker/examiner doesn't "get it"
Read 28 tweets
28 May
1/ To all those advocating saturation as *the* criterion for determining qual "sample" size (instead of Gender & Society's positivist qual 35 int minimum) please note that saturation has been critiqued for bloody decades as realist/positivist & not working for all qual. Here's
2/ Ian Dey in 1999 - yep over 20 years ago! - describing saturation as an "unfortunate metaphor": books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/gr…
3/ Here's me & @ginnybraun critiquing the use of saturation as information redundancy in thematic analysis research - arguing that saturation only makes sense in positivist/realist forms of TA. For our reflexive approach it simply doesn't work: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Read 8 tweets
15 May
1/ A thread providing an overview of my & @ginnybraun's latest paper on #thematicanalysis - Conceptual & Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis in the APA journal Qualitative Psychology - I will link to an open access version at the end of the thread: psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-45…
2/ Why this paper? Because TA is closer to a method (trans theoretical technique) rather than a methodology (theoretically informed & delimited framework for research) researchers need to engage in careful conceptual & design thinking to produce coherent research.
3/ What Levitt et al. (2017) call research with "methodological integrity". Some argue TA is actually a challenging option because it necessitates conceptual & design thinking - we like to see this more positively as TA making visible the thinking necessary for quality research.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(