I like to think investment topics that on surface seem mundane but with deeper thought, are more complex than meets the eye.
One of such topics is INSURANCE FLOAT. This thread covers the basics of float and how to think about valuing it.
Best enjoyed with a cup of tea 🫖
2/🧵
Let’s start with the basics.
If you’ve bought an insurance, you’ve paid an upfront fee called the “premium”. It is uncertain whether you will get anything back in form of “claims” over time, but the upfront fee must be paid, nevertheless.
3/🧵
Insurance company holds the capital for the time between collecting premiums and paying out claims. This pool of funds is called the “float”.
In other words, float is money being held and invested by the insurance company but not owned by it.
For the accounting fans out there, here’s the “scientific definition” used by Berkshire Hathaway.
Luckily, some insurance companies do disclose the aggregate numbers on a silver platter so you may put down your calculators.
5/🧵
With regards to float, there are three critical considerations:
i) the cost of float
ii) the growth of float
iii) investment returns with float
Let’s look at each one.
6/🧵
i) the cost of float
Float doesn’t come without commitments – there are future claims to be paid.
If insurer has underpriced risks, it suffers “underwriting losses” as claims exceed premiums over time. On the contrary, well-run insurers benefit from “underwriting profits”.
7/🧵
i) the cost of float
If insurance company is consistently posting underwriting profits, it is effectively BEING PAID to hold float, i.e. borrowing money at a negative interest rate.
Underwriting losses equal a cost (an interest paid) for the float.
8/🧵
i) the cost of float
Take $BRK Berkshire Hathaway. Its stellar insurance operations have meant that most of the time it has held substantial float at an interest less than that of Treasuries.
We’ve now concluded that float can have either positive or negative cost, depending on the quality of the underlying insurance operations.
As float is the result of a “living organism” of a company, it can also grow over the years once it’s bought.
11/🧵
ii) the growth of float
Take again Berkshire Hathaway that started its insurance operations in 1967 by acquiring National Indemnity. More details of the deal in the following tweet.
While insurer holds float on behalf of customers, it can be invested for an excess return.
How that money can be invested is regulated (see NAIC guidelines content.naic.org/sites/default/…) but there's still big differences between companies.
18/🧵
iii) investment returns with float
Most insurers must invest conservatively mainly to fixed asset classes.
E.g., Progressive $PGR had in 2020 a total of $42 billion (88%) in fixed or short-term securities, but only $5.5 billion (12%) in equities.
Thanks to its unique combination of insurance and unrelated operations, $BRK can invest meaningfully more in equities ($298 bln, or 66%) compared to low-risk assets ($155 bln, or 34%).
To summarize, returns should exceed risk-free returns (30-year Treasuries) but be limited by long-term equity returns.
Float is only attractive if it can be obtained at low cost, i.e. returns exceed the cost of float.
23/🧵
How about valuing float?
As float is other people’s money, it is accounted for as liability in the balance sheet. By now, however, we’ve learnt that it has very equity-like characteristics.
24/🧵
Holding $100 mln to invest for your own good, collecting returns as you go at no cost, should obviously be worth $100 mln for you.
So, constant, zero-cost float can be argued to be valued at least dollar to dollar.
25/🧵
In such a case, if company’s book value is of any worth and it’s a world-class insurer, a simple addition of equity and float should provide a helpful guideline.
It certainly seems so by looking at Progressive $PGR and Berkshire Hathaway $BRK.
26/🧵
What if we change the assumptions?
Here is sensitivity analysis with the following ranges and assumptions, mid-point being baseline:
- Discount rate 1 - 7%
- Investment premium (-2) - 6%
- Float growth (-10) - 10%
- Cost of float (-5) - 5%
- 15 years (no perpetuity)
27/🧵
In a nutshell, the net present value of float is calculated through the earnings stream it allows for its holder.
Below few additional golden nuggets of wisdom regarding float.
I’m not an insurance expert but consider that an advantage; had to oversimplify things for myself, hence hopefully been able to clarify it to you too.
For true insurance expertise, follow @SauliVilen 🇫🇮 if you’re a Finn and @ChrisBloomstran 🇺🇸 if you’re a curious human.
32/🧵
You’ve made it this far, so you seem to like threads. Me too.
Once I’ve got your attention, I’d appreciate your input on the best time to post threads like this in the future:
33/🧵
This was thread of insurance float – thanks for sticking with me!
If you enjoyed this, there'll be more so make sure to follow @hkeskiva. All my previous, similar threads can be found below if you still have some tea left.
Leverage can be a powerful tool during good times but a devil in disguise during bad ones.
Given its recent popularity, in this thread we look at MARGIN DEBT, its statistics, and predictive power on what future might hold.
Best enjoyed with a cup of tea 🫖
2/🧵
To cover the basics first, margin debt is the amount of money an investor borrows from the broker via a margin account.
The more there is margin debt, the more leverage is being used to own stocks with borrowed money that must be repaid at some point in time.
3/🧵
Imagine there's no margin debt, and it goes up by +$100 bln. All else equal, there’s $100 bln of additional capital chasing stocks, i.e. more liquidity.
When the reverse is true, margin debt -$100 bln, liquidity chasing stocks dries up by that amount, i.e. less liquidity.
One of my favorite ways to learn is to backward-engineer famous investments, especially Warren Buffett’s.
This thread gathers BUFFETT’S INVESTMENTS from the past decades, providing “tweet-sized” information on each one.
Best enjoyed with a cup of tea 🫖
2/🧵
Disclosure: The first patch will be in chronological order, but later ones added as they come.
There are so many cases that I am sure to miss some. Thanks in advance for letting me know what I missed and pointing out any errors there may be.
With this, let’s begin 😊
3/🧵
In 1942 at the ripe age of 11, Warren Buffett invested his life savings of $114.75 ($2,100 in 2021 dollars).
His first ever purchase was three preferred shares of Cities Services (today Citgo), later acquired by Occidental Petroleum, now owned by Petroleos de Venezuela.
Great companies come in different forms, but few, if any, check all the marks of perfection.
In this thread, we take a look at the CHARACTERISTICS OF A PERFECT COMPANY, using public companies as examples. Each is used as an example only once.
Best enjoyed with a cup of 🫖
2/🧵
Perfect company is easy to understand, even by a child. As Terry Smith would say, there’s “no gibbledigoo”.
It makes money selling hamburgers (Shake Shack $SHAK), brewing beer (Boston Beer $SAM), or manufacturing lubricants (WD-40 $WDFC).
Sometimes less is more.
3/🧵
Perfect company operates in a business with high margins. It can take a hit or two and still post healthy profit after operating expenses and future investments.
For example, Visa $V has gross margins of 80%, operating margins of 60% and net margins of 50%.
Here’s Buffett at 32, when he earned a million per year - or $8.8M per year in today’s dollars.
In this thread, we celebrate #BerkshireHathaway AGM weekend by looking closer at how he did it. We finish with a link to the 152 pages of gold: Buffett Partnership letters.
2/🧵
Many hedge fund managers expense so-called “2/20”, meaning that whatever happens with the investments, they get 2% of the assets plus 20% of any profits.
Even though they’d underperform the market, such system would incentivize them for the effort.
“Thanks!”
3/🧵
Here’s the outcome for the investors in this typical 2/20 model. See how 5% returns before fees leave investors with only 2% returns after fees (40% of the total).