I can't understand how it came to be that the number of people who think "build renewables" is the solution to climate change came to be such a majority that those who think otherwise are statistically equal to zero.
How did they sell that bullshit? I guess because the rich like.
Read this thread. This is hard numbers from the World Bank. This is what our leaders promise to do "for" us.
Read the whole thing. It should change *everybody's* mind.
This is the World Bank, people.
3. Depressing, to me, is that somehow with all these facts the author of this thread still concludes that would should build this disaster.
It's impossible.
No, we should not do the impossible.
It's impossible.
4. She's right about one thing: we must get off fossil fuels.
Somehow nobody notices that the way everyone says to get off fossil fuels is to multiply our current fossil fuel use by at least an order of magnitude.
That's not how you do it.
Increasing use doesn't eliminate use. 🤷
5. The way you get off fossil fuel energy is you reduce your energy use immediately, a little bit, then reduce some more, then more, and continually learn ways to accomplish your absolute needs on ever less and less energy until you are doing it without fossil fuels.
6. If you are in a planetwide crisis, and need to get off fossil fuels, the first thing you do is admit that the Rolling Stones were right: You can't always get what you want.
We need to go for "if you try sometimes, you'll find, you get what you need."
And settle for that.
7. I can understand why Presidents and Congresspersons will not tell you the truth. By definition, their job is to maintain the status quo.
Unfortunately, the status quo is a raging climate crisis.
Somebody needs to admit it.
8. You probably know that old Sherlock Holmes quote about, once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be the answer.
It is impossible to eliminate fossil fuels with renewable energy.
Im
Fucking
Possible.
Now what?
9. Well, as it turns out, "Now what" is "All of developed societies worldwide ignore that fact."
It's one approach, but it's not going to work.
10. And that's why Jeffie is so depressed and glum today.
I've spent 3 years Tweeting about this.
After 3 years, essentially nobody in the entire climate activist community will say anything but "Build renewables!!"
Nobody.
OK. Here's the grim truth, y'all: we are doomed.
11. We are doomed and we don't have to be.
Well over half the humans on Earth know how to live, eat regularly, and sleep indoors, warm and dry, with no or nearly no fossil fuel energy.
300,000 to 400,000 American Amish and other religious Old Orders do it right in front of us.
12. And when I mention that people tell me Amish are Very Bad and abuse their children and run puppy mills.
As though this (if relevant or true) is caused by their decision to live with no, or very little, fossil energy.
Basically they stick their fingers in their ears and go
LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU.
Yeah, I know you can't. You've got your fingers in your ears.
We are, quite literally, absolutely doomed. We're not only absolutely committed to doing the things that cause climate change, we're speeding them all up.
14. I'm tired of it. I've got nothing else to say.
The reason we all have to die if climate change is because, given a choice, it's our preference.
That's it.
And I can't change that.
Tomorrow morning ten thousand Twitter users will tweet #ActOnClimate , meaning "burn more oil."
15. What I can't understand is people like Michael Mann. He's a scientist. If he wasn't so invested in renewables, he'd admit that it's not the way. But - for everyone else, it's like, OK, Doctor Michael Mann, or high school graduate Jeff McFadden?
16. I don't have much left to say. We could live without all these toys. Those few who survive will live without these toys. Too bad we've decided to make it so ugly so soon.
Suppertime.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm going to run through screenshots of a conversation I just had with a highly paid climate professional.
He started with the normal climate tweet: "Take action now."
So I asked my usual annoying question. What action?
2. As usual, his response was not what I define as "action", but was, rather, a statement of end point goals.
You can see that he knew I wasn't going to be impressed.
Who on Earth could dispute "phase out GHG emissions?"
I had asked for "how" but he didn't want to discuss that.
3. So. What was my reply?
I still wanted him to name actions. Things people could do, as averse to words to say.
What is an action which furthers this goal? What comes next? Step 1, step 2, first you get the... Nah. We don't do that in the developed world.
I'm sewing on my team lines this morning, adjusting them to more ideally fit the team, to make work more comfortable for all of us.
This provides me a productive task on which to focus, to keep my mind away from the poison of 21st century industrial America.
You can see here that I have made the lines so they split too far back and tend to hang up on the girls and their harness.
Here I have sewn them further up, and they are laying better to the task, but I think there's still room for improvement.
This is what I call "progress." To most of America "progress" is more high energy machines.
I guess it depends on your objective.
My theory:
If there is any possibility of humankind escaping the worst of the doom we have signed up for (not a sure thing) that possibility lies in maximizing the biological carbon cycle.
There is lots of room for growth. We've killed and paved much of it.
2. Reducing our emissions will be an inevitable output of any serious effort to restore / regenerate / reactivate the global ecosystem / biosphere / carbon cycle.
All this high energy high volume giant scale machinery everyone wants to replace fossil fuels with - that's opposite.
3. We already have too much carbon in the atmosphere. I'm not going to defend that point.
If we want to survive, we take action to reduce that carbon directly, not by machinery that we have to emit carbon to build, but by photosynthesis at every level supported by other life.
Observe the orange box, and the stripes into and out of it.
The orange box is electric generation. The stripes in are what powers it, and the stripes out are where the energy from it goes.
The biggest stripe, the light gray one, is the energy wasted ("rejected") by the process.
2. Now observe the largest pink box, the one at the bottom. Transportation. Observe the bands going into it from the left, which consists of, mostly, the dark green band, petroleum. And it's a big sucker.
Observe that the light gray output, wasted energy, is about 4 times as big,
3. As the dark gray band, "energy services," i.e. "What we wanted out of this process."
Now. Every day, often five to ten times per day, I see "electric vehicles" listed as "for the climate" to "reduce emissions."
I tweeted this donkey story earlier today. I'm going to spin it, a related donkey story, and some thoughts together here. I welcome y'all to come along, but it may be a bumpy ride.
Many of the gate and corner posts on our place are rotting off. Wood does that. Some woods are very resistant, but it doesn't suit our economy to grow them. We need morebiggerbetterfaster. So these were all treated posts or old railroad ties.
They rot off 6" under the ground.
3. Phone poles do too. Climbing telephone people are trained to probe a pole with a long screwdriver, downward at a slant from ground level.
If the screwdriver goes in, don't climb it.
I've climbed it, because I was self employed and needed the work, but that's another story.
True donkey story: 🧵
There was a spot on the road near home that Clara was afraid of.
Some scumbag had dumped a big old overstuffed recliner in the ditch there, and the way it had fallen there was a big black hole in the middle. Scared Clara something fierce.
2. I was going to take her on a lead rope, and take a pocket full of goodies, and walk down there and spend some time looking closely at it, let her see that it wasn't a threat, but the county finally came and hauled it away. So I thought it was all done.
3. As it turned out, though, between the fencerow tree line the neighbor's row of big bales in deep shade on the other side, the general darkness of the area, and the memory, she still always shied away from the spot. It's along part of our farm, so it was a recurring problem.