I know it is difficult to believe, but there was a time when key tech leaders and influencers of the world were dead set against the graphical interface.

In 1985, less than a year after Macintosh was unveiled the naysayers were out in full force... 1/ The images in this thread are all from a scanned article. If
2/ About 2M Apple ][ had been sold in total. About 3.5M IBM PCs (8086). About 8M Atari, TRS-80, C64 all combined. This was early. ~20M computers sold, worldwide, total.

Dr Dobbs, InfoWorld, Byte magazines were supreme. We're in "Halt and Catch Fire" S1. Joe MacMillan reads IW.
3/ If a hobbyist magazine printed a story you didn't like you probably just ranted at your user group meeting thursday night.

If it really bugged you, then you'd write a letter to the editor. Maybe they would print it a few weeks later. Then a few thousand people would see it.
4/ So imagine how much you disliked the idea of windows (lower case, as in graphical OS on Macintosh--there is no MS Windows yet) that you'd send in a full 750 word "post" on how much you hated the idea. Then you'd have this from InfoWorld, Feb 1985. Full story "I Don't Do Windows"
5/ Ignore the opening sexism, all too common in the era.

This rant covers every angle of a technical buzzsaw against a graphical OS and why it won't work.
• Screens too small
• Who needs multitasking
• Can just do <x> another way
• Who needs two programs at once
6/ This is a totally classic argument: what is new can't possibly be simpler than what we have.

The biggest thing that bugs me, EVERY SINGLE TIME, about this form of buzzsaw is where were these people when the first computer arrived. Did they argue in favor of teletype over CRT?
7/ A form of this argument comes with every new technology. It is necessary, though not sufficient. That's the rub.

One thing for certain: the next time something cool comes along, remember just how easy it is to offer up a technical buzzsaw. // END

PS hardcoresoftware.substack.com
PS/ Rants like this put the changes being debated in our favorite platforms in context. Honestly, nothing at all being discussed today or even the past 10 years comes close to character -> graphical in "magnitude" of change. Yet, these arguments are made (eg tabs in safari).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steven Sinofsky

Steven Sinofsky Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stevesi

14 Sep
Study of Microsoft employees shows how remote work puts productivity and innovation at risk geekwire.com/2021/study-mic… via @GeekWire // This is a paper out from a large group of researchers at Microsoft (and others). I have many thoughts on this. 1/
2/ My intention is not to comment on research per se but on how it might be misapplied. Studies of electronic communication in orgs--have been put forth ever since MSFT introduced email. At best this is telemetry and at worst it can be used to imply causality.
3/ I have no doubt that this research accurately captures the flow of information using digital tools around the company for over 60K people. That's a huge amount of work and analysis. Kudos. The challenge from the outset is that it conflates that flow with "collaboration".
Read 26 tweets
9 Sep
With early success in a product there's often a strong desire (or rush) to "make it a platform". Having an app is great and making it a platform is better.

How Microsoft and Apple worked *together* to create Macintosh is a huge lesson on building a platform. 1/ Steve Jobs on cover of InfoWorld February 1984 "Apple B
2/ Apple saw the value of having VisiCalc on Apple ][ and IBM saw that for PCs with 1-2-3.

The common thread is that platforms benefitted from a third party betting their future business on the platform. It was existential for the platform to have companies doing that.
3/ Conversely, third parties came to realize that betting their business on a platform can create a stronger relationship--an influencer relationship--with the platform. Bill Gates saw that potential with Macintosh.
Read 12 tweets
6 Sep
Incompatible Files, Slipping, Office 97 RTM— new post in “Hardcore Software” …rdcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/045-incompat… // “Reviews” were a key part of the early days of the PC era. In the context of shipping Office 97, this post looks at how reviews were changing as the industry matured. 1/11
2/ From the earliest days through Windows 95, personal computer reviews were primarily done by “tech enthusiasts” and aimed at same. Basically hobbyists reviewed products for hobbyists. That was the industry. Here’s BYTE giving Office 97 ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ across the board. Toward a More Productive Of...
3/ Such enthusiast outlets were our key constituency as most all sales were driven through retail channel and most retail customers were buying magazines like these by the pound (at the peak, an issue of BYTE or PCMag was hundreds of pages, mostly ads). So victory.
Read 11 tweets
1 Sep
"Making the Laptop Commonplace" - NY Times 1985. A great example of challenges in forecasting progress in technologies when improvements are happing at exponential rates. Article asks what happened to all those predictions from last year (!) that laptops would be a big deal? 1/ Image
2/ "People don't want to lug a computer with them to the beach or on a train to while away hours they would rather spend reading the sports or business section of the newspaper."

What if the laptop were the place to read those!
3/ "Right now laptops cost considerably more than the equivalent desktop computer."

What if the need to innovate in laptops not only made components smaller, but cheaper, and at the same time consume less energy? Then who wouldn't want a laptop *instead* of a desktop?
Read 8 tweets
17 Aug
The “gyrations” through Apple’s beta cycle since WWDC when it comes to Safari UX are fascinating—some might even say not very “Apple-like”. Changing is fine. But where the design seems to be ending up is suboptimal for a platform, IMO. Here’s why, but not why one might think /1 Safari settings choices for iPhone in iOS beta 6.Safari tabs settings in iPadOS beta 6.
2/ Moving address bar up/down and/or having a separate address bar are rational design choices that people will (vigorously) debate. I have an opinion too.

What one has come to expect from Apple is a “point of view” in product design expressed through “the way it should work.”
3/ There was a lot of feedback about the early design and implementation. It was rough. That started the feedback loop from developers (those are who use the beta) that it was never going to be right. Developers of all people should know it could change. But momentum gained…
Read 16 tweets
15 Aug
1/ "Clippy, The F*cking Clown" **new post** Looks like you're trying to do a section in "Hardcore Software" on the origin and behind the scenes of Clippy. …rdcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/042-clippy-the…
2/ If you would have told me in 1997 that I would still be talking about the paperclip in 2021, I would have LOLed and OMGed. I definitely want to go through reasoning and choices of the feature because it is super interesting. But the real story is not as much why, but how?
3/ In 1995, Office was half of Microsoft's profits. Through the release of Office 95 there were over 12 million licenses sold (about 100M Windows capable PCs had been sold since 1990). Still, there was competition from two billion-dollar companies, leaders in the DOS era. Revenues for Windows and Office from annual report.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(