US Sec of State Blinken warned today that the US is getting "closer to the point at which a strict return to compliance with the #JCPOA does not reproduce the benefits that that agreement achieved"

That's not surprising given the bleak picture pained by the IAEA's new report 1/
The current IAEA monitoring situation is particularly serious. In addition to Iran's refusal to official clarify if the February 2021 special monitoring arrangement is still in place, Tehran has not responded to requests by the IAEA to access remote surveillance equipment. 2/
Under the Feb 2021 special arrangement, this equipment is recording information that will be given the IAEA if the JCPOA is restored. The data will ideally allow the IAEA to maintain knowledge about Iran's nuclear activities during the period when Iran limited inspector access.3/
The IAEA report says the equipment needs to be serviced & data storage replaced every three months - that date passed around Aug. 24, increasing the risk of lapses in data collection that could impede the IAEA's ability to reconstruct a record of Iran's nuclear activities. 4/
There is also a significant gap in the current data collection. The report notes that Iran removed four cameras from a centrifuge production facility in June after an incident. 5/ nytimes.com/2021/06/23/wor…
The IAEA has not been able to replace the cameras - that's a big blind spot. Furthermore, when the IAEA was allowed Sept. 4 to access the removed cameras, the data storage was not among the debris from one of the machines, which was destroyed The IAEA asked Iran to find it. 6/
The IAEA was also not able to check the data from the other 3 cameras. Is it recoverable? The agency may not know until/if the #IranDeal is restored.

In addition to disruptions to continuity of knowledge, this will likely drive speculation that Iran has something to hide. 7/
This radio silence from Iran on the IAEA's requests to clarify the status of the special monitoring arrangement & service the surveillance equipment is driving discussions about whether the IAEA Board should act next week to censure Iran. 8/
Raisi warned against IAEA Board action, saying an "unconstructive move" could disrupt efforts to negotiate the restoration of the 2015 nuclear deal.

But Tehran's actions are driving that discussion. It's unsurprising that IAEA Board member states are considering censure. 9/
The current monitoring situation is not sustainable & the IAEA Board members may feel compelled to act to support the agency & send a message to Iran.

Iran's failure to communicate & cooperate with the IAEA is also putting talks to restore the JCPOA at risk. 10/
The Sept. 7 IAEA report notes that "Iran’s failure to respond to the Agency’s requests for access
to its monitoring equipment is seriously compromising the Agency’s technical capability to maintain
continuity of knowledge" 11/
The report goes to say that the continuity of knowledge is "necessary for the Agency to resume its verification and monitoring of Iran’s nuclear-related commitments in the future."

That's a concerning assessment, & it will get worse if Iran's cooperation does not improve. 12/
There is still time to avert a crisis, but its critical that Raisi prioritize working with the IAEA to address these monitoring issues. He may think that ambiguity over Iran's nuclear program will give Iran more leverage in talks to restore the JCPOA. That a dangerous gamble. 13/
As Blinken reiterated today, the window for restoring the accord will not remain open forever. Gaps in monitoring could influence the US assessment as to whether or not the deal's nonpro benefits can be restored. 14/
A number of other nuclear factors will also influence that assessment. The Sept. 7 report noted progress on installation of equipment at Iran's uranium metal production facility. Stocks of uranium enriched to 20 & 60 percent also grew since May. 15/
While Iran has not made progress on planned IR-4 & IR-6 cascades, it is operating cascades of these machines & gathering performance data. This knowledge cannot be undone & must be taken into account when assessing the viability of restoring the nonpro benefits of the deal 16/
This progress again underscores the critical importance of the Raisi administration swiftly returning to talks in Vienna to restore the #IranDeal & building on progress made during the first six rounds. 17/
Raisi's rhetoric & the current trajectory of the nuclear program suggest he may try to drive a harder bargain to extract more sanctions relief &, in the process, overplay his hand or drag out talks past the point where the US thinks it's worth continuing. 18/
Undoubtably, the Trump administration manufactured this crisis when it withdrew from the #IranDeal without cause & reimposed sanctions on Iran in violation of the accord. 19/
But Iran is now prolonging this crisis & jeopardizing efforts to restore the #JCPOA. Hopefully Raisi changes course before the window closes. 19/19

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kelsey Davenport

Kelsey Davenport Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KelseyDav

14 May 19
Today, both the NYT & Newsweek repeated claims that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons - it is irresponsible & dangerous reporting to let these claims stand unchecked. #IranDeal 1/
Both Pompeo & Bolton have muddied the water with loose rhetoric describing Iran’s nuclear program that implies Tehran has an active nuclear weapons program - despite US intelligence assessments and IAEA statements saying otherwise. 2/
Pompeo said April 22 that one of the U.S. demands of Iran is to “end your pursuit of nuclear weapons.”
state.gov/secretary/rema…

Bolton said in February that Iran “continues to seek nuclear weapons.”
3/
Read 8 tweets
21 May 18
US Secretary of State Pomepo is talking about the #IranDeal right now - c-span.org/networks/?chan…
Pompeo reiterates an often used criticism of the #IranDeal, namely that the agreement expires. This mischaracterization ignores key provisions that remain in place in perpetuity, such as more intrusive monitoring & a prohibition on weaponization activities
Pompeo says the Trump administration will ensure that Iran has no path to a nuclear weapon, by applying “unprecedented financial pressure” & the “strongest sanctions in history.”
Read 10 tweets
8 May 18
Ahead of Trump’s announcement on the #IranDeal - at which point he is expected to reimpose sanctions in violation of the agreement - it is worth recapping what nuclear agreement has accomplished & its nonproliferation value 1/
As a result of the 2013 interim deal, Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to 20 percent was neutralized. The JCPOA prohibited enrichment to levels above 3.67 percent for 15 years 2/
Iran also removed nearly 20,000 centrifuges, including its more advanced IR-2 machines, and is capped at enriching uranium only with 5,060 IR-1s at Natanz. Iran can only stockpile the equivalent of 300 kilograms of uranium enriched to 3.67 percent 3/
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(