Feels like maybe some people have taken the (correct) premise that a disproportionately energized base on the unpopular side of an issue can shift the political calculus in their favor, and missed that the anti-vaccine faction doesn't actually seem to have intensity advantage.
e.g.
(The remaining question is whether politics is more likely to shift current views about the vaccine or whether the vaccine is more likely to shift current views about politics, and I suspect the answer to that is possibly "yes.")
(Or "yes, but not on a macro level," who knows.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) the children's cartoon "Arthur" includes two goldfish named Vladimir and Estragon, according to the "Arthur" wiki
2) there is an "Arthur" wiki
truly, the internet
there had better be a comic misunderstanding subplot where somebody is petsitting and panics because they think they've somehow lost a third fish named Godot
"shall we go?"
"yes, let's go"
"...go where?"
"what are you -- ooh, plastic castle"
(yes, I know the goldfish memory thing is apocryphal, work with me here)
would read: a comparative study on the quantity and engagement levels of posts on different social media platforms whose main premise is that the social media platform in question is bad
like, do people love tiktoking(?) that tiktok is awful as much as they do tweeting that twitter is awful