So, should we get special, "other", disposable, people to take it, before we do?
Are people who enter clinical trials "fools"?
We just sponge off their altruism, shall we?
I noticed that after my first Jab, I got into a heated argument with Matthew Shun-Shin, and called him a dimwit, for his advocacy of the Oxford Comma.
Since the second, I have repeatedly lambasted James Howard for his preference for the single quote over the double quote, in Javascript.
I think I am gonna sue the Jab makers.
Money grabbing bastards, working all hours to come up with ways to cut COVID mortality by 90%. It's all part of the conspiracy, I tell you. I would rather be intubated, and my elderly frail relatives die, than have this bill-gates-nanobots!
Here is the UK's British National Formulary (equivalent in role, I believe, to the US Physician's Desk Reference) regarding standard short-acting metoprolol.
A question that I thought was simple, has had enormous pushback from respondents. 50:50 are ardently espousing an answer I consider to be obviously wrong.
Suppose there is a shop which only lets you in if you bring exactly ONE child.
Each person going shopping has two children, and chooses one child to go with them, but ALWAYS takes a boy if they have a boy.
For a randomly chosen customer in the shop, if their accompanying child is a boy, what is the probability that the child at home is a girl?
Let's give it a few days to see how people vote.
Please don't give the answer away, as it will spoil the experience.