What was Jesus Christ doing & where was He from the time He was 12 to 29?
Unknown years of Jesus
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_y…
“The 18 unknown years:
Following the accounts of Jesus' young life, there is a gap of about 18 years in his story in the New Testament. Other than the
2/“statement that after he was 12 years old (Luke 2:42) Jesus "advanced in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and men" (Luke 2:52), the New Testament has no other details regarding the gap.

Claims of young Jesus in India and/or Tibet:
In 1887, Russian war correspondent
3/“Nicolas Notovitch claimed that while at the Hemis Monastery in Ladakh, he had learned of a document called the "Life of Saint Issa, Best of the Sons of Men" – Isa being the Arabic name of Jesus in Islam. Notovitch's story, with a translated text of the "Life of Saint Issa",
4/“was published in French in 1894 as La vie inconnue de Jesus Christ (Unknown Life of Jesus Christ).

According to the scrolls, Jesus abandoned Jerusalem at the age of 13 and set out towards Sind, “intending to improve and perfect himself in the divine understanding and to
5/“studying the laws of the great Buddha”. He crossed Punjab and reached Puri Jagannath where he studied the Vedas under Brahmin priests. He spent six years in Puri and Rajgirh, near Nalanda, the ancient seat of Hindu learning. Then he went to the Himalayas, and spent time in
6/“Tibetan monasteries, studying Buddhism, and through Persia, returned to Jerusalem at the age of 29.”

Fact or fiction? Can’t rule either out, but you have to read Nicholas Notovictch’s “The Unknown Life of Jesus Christ” first before forming an opinion:
amazon.com/JESUS-CHRIST-T…
7/Max Muller, who “stated that either the monks at the monastery had deceived Notovitch (or played a joke on him), or he had fabricated the evidence” has been “severely criticised for being anti-Christian”, and:
“In 1922, Swami Abhedananda, the president of the Vedanta Society of
8/“New York between 1897 and 1921 and the author of several books, went to the Himalayas on foot and reached Tibet, where he studied Buddhist philosophy and Tibetan Buddhism. He went to the Hemis Monastery, and allegedly found the manuscript translated by Notovitch, which was a
9/“Tibetan translation of the original scrolls written in Pali.”
I’ve read Notovitch’s book & found it not only credible but believable. As one who became a Born Again Christian in 1979 at 22 (same time as Bob Dylan coincidentally), before fully embracing Krsna & His Eternal
10/Consort Radha as together comprising the Supreme Deity, aka God, the creator of the spiritual world (Vaikuntha) & material world (Samsara),
(the seeds of my belief were planted by George Harrison’s songs My Sweet Lord and Awaiting On You All -
“By chanting the names of the
11/Lord and you’ll be free
The Lord is waiting on you all to awaken and see” -
on All Things Must Pass, my favorite solo Beatles album, and watered thru my devotional experiences of greeting the Deities at the Krsna temple in Hawaii and thru temple living w/ my spouse in NYC)
12/Notovitch’s book was like finding a missing puzzle piece: “So after He told his parents: “I have to be on my Father’s business” after rebuking the Pharisees in the temple when He was 12, Jesus hit the Silk Road for Jagannath Puri!! It all makes sense!!”
Will do a thread later
13/lends credulity to the position that Notovitch’s book cannot be written off or dismissed. For one, there’s reason to believe Swami Abhedananda who “allegedly found the manuscript translated by Notovitch, which was a Tibetan translation of the original scrolls written in Pali.”
14/Tibetan monks have always been very wary of Western Christians like Max Muller, b/c Christians typically burned their manuscripts in the past. So when Muller contacted the Hemis Monastery in Ladak asking about Notovitch (whom they allegedly trusted b/c they saw he was sincere)
15/do you think the monks would say: “Oh, Nicholas? Whom we allowed to read and translate the manuscript "Life of Saint Issa" written 19 centuries ago? Oh yes, yes. He was here.”??? Their response would’ve been: “Nicholas who? Uh…Nope. No one by that name has passed thru here.”
16/The truth seeker has to dig deeper. I might follow up on Swami Abhedananda & read Nicholas Notovitch’s natal chart. Srila Prabhupada in his translation & purports of Bhagavad-Gita & Srimad Bhagavatam says Jesus Christ was an avatar sent from God. So the Vedic lit respects
17/Jesus as God’s son. Which means Jesus is Krsna’s son. Srimad Bhagavatam foretells Buddha appearing as an incarnation of Krsna. So if Buddha was an incarnation of Krsna, then when Jesus was studying the Buddha’s teachings He was studying what His Father taught (as the Buddha)
18/in preparation for His own ministry. It makes sense. To be truly objective you leave no stone unturned. Just dismissing Notovitch's account is intellectual laziness and spiritual slothfulness involving no critical thinking. How else do you explain at least two of Buddha's
19/parables finding their way into Jesus's ministry?

It's totally believable that Jesus hit the Silk Road for India & Tibet (leaving at 12, Dylanesque), rebuked the Bhramins for not teaching the outcasts & studied Buddha's teachings b4 returning to Israel.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael L Bonic

Michael L Bonic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BonicMichael

16 Sep
Kim Yo Jong "compared the North’s officially revealed weapons plans to those that Moon promoted, and accused him of double standards for defending his tests as “legitimate” while refusing to accept the same label for the North’s."
nknews.org/2021/09/kim-yo…
2/Kim Yo Jong "did not directly criticize the South’s SLBM test or other missile developments that South Korea conducted and revealed on Wednesday, but added that Moon’s attitude was a “great regret” and “worrying toward the development of North-South relations.”
3/"Kim Yo Jong took particular issue with the word “provocation..."
I also take issue at the double standard of US, South Korea, UK & Western allies calling DPRK's defense drills/tests ‘threats’ & ‘provocations’, but US-ROK exercises aren't 'provocations'.
Read 10 tweets
16 Sep
Truth is unpopular in the material world. Of course statement is true 👇. So is “North Korea should always have the right to defend itself.” So is “John Bolton advocated for a preemptive nuclear strike on DPRK in the name of self-defense”. DPRK has the right to nuclear deterrent.
2/It can be argued that the greatest hypocrisy of the modern era is how US, South Korea, UK & Western allies say: “We have the right to self-defend ourselves against North Korea’s ‘threats’/‘provocations’” and: “DPRK doesn’t have this right that we have”.
3/For as long as this hypocrisy continues, as well as the inability to adopt a new negotiating strategy that addresses DPRK security concerns persists, ☮️ on the Korean Peninsula will be elusive, and escalation & an arms race become more likely. If ROK & US “want it all”, i.e.
Read 10 tweets
15 Sep
Kim Yo-jong responds to Moon Jae-in's criticisms of North Korea's ballistic missile launches last week, saying Moon’s “illogical and brazen-faced” comments echoed the US stance.
North Korea calls president Moon ‘a parrot raised by America’ in new salvo scmp.com/news/asia/east…
2/Moon Jae-in "termed Seoul's growing missile capabilities as a “sure deterrence" against provocations from Pyongyang [when] commenting on Seoul's defence capabilities after Seoul's first successful test of a submarine-launched ballistic missile.”
hindustantimes.com/world-news/irk…
3/Kim Yo Jong is reacting against the illogicality of Moon's statement that stems from mislabeling Pyongyang’s recent launching of a “tactical” cruise missile followed by two missiles/projectiles as “provocations”, a term which belies ignorance or willful unacceptable of the fact
Read 9 tweets
13 Sep
If you’re an advocate for Deterrence Theory raise your hand. ✋ DPRK’s nuclear capability war deterrent is what’s preventing the US from taking aggressive military action against North Korea. Paradoxically, then, DPRK practicing nuclear deterrence is keeping the ☮️ on the KP.
2/Why am I defending DPRK’s putting nuclear deterrence theory into action?
1) On principle
2) North Koreans whom I’ve seen are super cool and I like them, wish we were friends
3) I love the Moranbong Band and Wangjaesan Dance Troupe
4) I take David’s side in David vs Goliath
3/When I’m convinced there’s a way to living peacefully w/ a normalized nuclear North Korea, but Washington stubbornly stands in the way, it’s infuriating. If the world will be better off living w/ nuclear NK in ☮️ on the KP, then my own country, the USA, is part of the problem.
Read 6 tweets
12 Sep
The Doha Agreement was built around 3 strategic objectives. Biden, who said his pull-out was an “extraordinary success”, negated all 3 objectives.
state.gov/wp-content/upl…
2/There's only one adequate response to this, one which Americans know well:
3/The 3 strategic objectives in the Doha Agreement:
I) The Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan provided for the Ghani government & the Taliban to form a coalition government that would NOT be called “the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan” (Taliban's "dream-come-true").
Read 13 tweets
12 Sep
Narrow is the way to Peace on the Korean Peninsula
☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️
Where’s the Roadmap to the Peace Treaty? Right now the US has none, which is unacceptable.

Since the Korean Armistice Agreement was signed, US’s North Korea policy has been premised by this conditional:
2/If (North Korea has nukes) then (US won’t sign a Peace Treaty). The contra positive of this is:
If (US signs a Peace Treaty) then (North Korea doesn’t have nukes).
Up until DPRK’s 2013 April 1 Nuclear Law (passed a month after Kim Jong Un heard from Dennis Rodman that Obama had
3/refused to call him by phone to talk), FFVD was in the cards for DPRK. It hung by a thread since then up to KJU’s 2020 NYD Address, whence FFVD/CVID were permanently removed from the table in accordance w/ DPRK’s “new road” that has “absolute deterrence” as its theoretical
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(