The Doha Agreement was built around 3 strategic objectives. Biden, who said his pull-out was an “extraordinary success”, negated all 3 objectives.
state.gov/wp-content/upl…
2/There's only one adequate response to this, one which Americans know well:
3/The 3 strategic objectives in the Doha Agreement:
I) The Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan provided for the Ghani government & the Taliban to form a coalition government that would NOT be called “the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan” (Taliban's "dream-come-true").
4/II) Under the coalition government of Afghanistan there would be NO SAFE HAVEN FOR TERRORISTS:
“In conjunction with the announcement of this agreement, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban will
5/"take the following steps to prevent any group or individual, including al-Qa’ida, from using the soil of Afghanistan to threaten the security of the United States and its allies.”
III) Having positive relations w/ the new post-settlement Afghan Islamic government that will
6/ensure Afghanistan never becomes a safe haven for terrorists:
“The United States and the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban seek positive relations with each other and expect that the relations
7/"between the United States and the new post-settlement Afghan Islamic government as determined by the intra-Afghan dialogue and negotiations will be positive.”

What Joe Biden accomplished (an “extraordinary success”, his words):
8/I) Ghani fled, there is no coalition government & the Taliban own the country and have once again named Afghanistan the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (“which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban”), the culmination of their dream. D’oh!!
9/II) Altho the Taliban say Afghanistan won’t be a safe haven for terrorists, they own the country and time will tell if they give al Qaeda safe haven.
III) China now already has positive relations with its new client state, the Islamic Emirate of
usnews.com/news/world-rep…
10/Afghanistan.
So under the Doha Agreement the Afghan coalition government would keep Bagram. There's be no US boots on the ground but there'd are US shoes on the ground, i.e. US eyes & ears. But now the Taliban owns Bagram and Chinese troops and military equipment will move in
11/after they erase "USA" and ink "PRC" in the old SOFA agreement.

What is clear is Biden threw US strategic objectives in Afghanistan out the window for the sake of the political optics of taking credit for pulling out of Afghanistan. And Dems are happy.
12/That's a double D'oh:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael L Bonic

Michael L Bonic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BonicMichael

16 Sep
Kim Yo Jong "compared the North’s officially revealed weapons plans to those that Moon promoted, and accused him of double standards for defending his tests as “legitimate” while refusing to accept the same label for the North’s."
nknews.org/2021/09/kim-yo…
2/Kim Yo Jong "did not directly criticize the South’s SLBM test or other missile developments that South Korea conducted and revealed on Wednesday, but added that Moon’s attitude was a “great regret” and “worrying toward the development of North-South relations.”
3/"Kim Yo Jong took particular issue with the word “provocation..."
I also take issue at the double standard of US, South Korea, UK & Western allies calling DPRK's defense drills/tests ‘threats’ & ‘provocations’, but US-ROK exercises aren't 'provocations'.
Read 10 tweets
16 Sep
Truth is unpopular in the material world. Of course statement is true 👇. So is “North Korea should always have the right to defend itself.” So is “John Bolton advocated for a preemptive nuclear strike on DPRK in the name of self-defense”. DPRK has the right to nuclear deterrent.
2/It can be argued that the greatest hypocrisy of the modern era is how US, South Korea, UK & Western allies say: “We have the right to self-defend ourselves against North Korea’s ‘threats’/‘provocations’” and: “DPRK doesn’t have this right that we have”.
3/For as long as this hypocrisy continues, as well as the inability to adopt a new negotiating strategy that addresses DPRK security concerns persists, ☮️ on the Korean Peninsula will be elusive, and escalation & an arms race become more likely. If ROK & US “want it all”, i.e.
Read 10 tweets
15 Sep
Kim Yo-jong responds to Moon Jae-in's criticisms of North Korea's ballistic missile launches last week, saying Moon’s “illogical and brazen-faced” comments echoed the US stance.
North Korea calls president Moon ‘a parrot raised by America’ in new salvo scmp.com/news/asia/east…
2/Moon Jae-in "termed Seoul's growing missile capabilities as a “sure deterrence" against provocations from Pyongyang [when] commenting on Seoul's defence capabilities after Seoul's first successful test of a submarine-launched ballistic missile.”
hindustantimes.com/world-news/irk…
3/Kim Yo Jong is reacting against the illogicality of Moon's statement that stems from mislabeling Pyongyang’s recent launching of a “tactical” cruise missile followed by two missiles/projectiles as “provocations”, a term which belies ignorance or willful unacceptable of the fact
Read 9 tweets
13 Sep
If you’re an advocate for Deterrence Theory raise your hand. ✋ DPRK’s nuclear capability war deterrent is what’s preventing the US from taking aggressive military action against North Korea. Paradoxically, then, DPRK practicing nuclear deterrence is keeping the ☮️ on the KP.
2/Why am I defending DPRK’s putting nuclear deterrence theory into action?
1) On principle
2) North Koreans whom I’ve seen are super cool and I like them, wish we were friends
3) I love the Moranbong Band and Wangjaesan Dance Troupe
4) I take David’s side in David vs Goliath
3/When I’m convinced there’s a way to living peacefully w/ a normalized nuclear North Korea, but Washington stubbornly stands in the way, it’s infuriating. If the world will be better off living w/ nuclear NK in ☮️ on the KP, then my own country, the USA, is part of the problem.
Read 6 tweets
12 Sep
Narrow is the way to Peace on the Korean Peninsula
☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️☮️
Where’s the Roadmap to the Peace Treaty? Right now the US has none, which is unacceptable.

Since the Korean Armistice Agreement was signed, US’s North Korea policy has been premised by this conditional:
2/If (North Korea has nukes) then (US won’t sign a Peace Treaty). The contra positive of this is:
If (US signs a Peace Treaty) then (North Korea doesn’t have nukes).
Up until DPRK’s 2013 April 1 Nuclear Law (passed a month after Kim Jong Un heard from Dennis Rodman that Obama had
3/refused to call him by phone to talk), FFVD was in the cards for DPRK. It hung by a thread since then up to KJU’s 2020 NYD Address, whence FFVD/CVID were permanently removed from the table in accordance w/ DPRK’s “new road” that has “absolute deterrence” as its theoretical
Read 8 tweets
11 Sep
What was Jesus Christ doing & where was He from the time He was 12 to 29?
Unknown years of Jesus
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_y…
“The 18 unknown years:
Following the accounts of Jesus' young life, there is a gap of about 18 years in his story in the New Testament. Other than the
2/“statement that after he was 12 years old (Luke 2:42) Jesus "advanced in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and men" (Luke 2:52), the New Testament has no other details regarding the gap.

Claims of young Jesus in India and/or Tibet:
In 1887, Russian war correspondent
3/“Nicolas Notovitch claimed that while at the Hemis Monastery in Ladakh, he had learned of a document called the "Life of Saint Issa, Best of the Sons of Men" – Isa being the Arabic name of Jesus in Islam. Notovitch's story, with a translated text of the "Life of Saint Issa",
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(