Most roads belong to the public, which has appointed the govt. to build and manage them. The right to set rules for their use follows from their public nature.
You are, however, free to drive drunk on the wrong side of the road on your own property.
You are, however, free to drive drunk on the wrong side of the road on your own property.
https://twitter.com/gryndil/status/1436780604276805637
Vax mandates expand beyond public property to all of life, and impose on people far beyond what is necessary to stop the spread of disease. The govt. arguably has the right to require tests, and to quarantine those that are infectious. It does not propose to do this, though.
Why it doesn't propose to do this I can't say. Perhaps it has something to do with its own statements that the vaccinated can still be infectious?
But whatever the reason, the claimed power needs legal justification that it very probably lacks.
But whatever the reason, the claimed power needs legal justification that it very probably lacks.
I don't know where you picked up the idea that the U.S. govt. has the right to do whatever it wants if it thinks the results will be good for the public (in the govt.'s judgment). However, the Constitution says precisely the opposite. Try reading it sometime.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
