Struggling with an icon (as one does). The struggle here is that the check mark is common for "ok/ready/done". In Sweden it has historically been used to mark wrong answers on tests. The opposite, really. So now I need more understanding on how big of a conflict this really is.
Not looking for help Twitter guidance, just sharing a struggle that has roots in cultural differences where a small country is also heavily influenced by the culture of a bigger country with differing mental models.
Reminds me of my dissertation on translation in fiction.
Rabbit hole. Here we go:
In Sweden, correct answers were traditionally marked with an "R" for "Rätt".
In Finland, ✓ often stands for väärin, i.e., "wrong", due to its similarity to a slanted v.
In Japan, the O mark is used instead of the check mark, and the X or ✓ mark are commonly used for wrong.
Also known as Marujirushi (丸印) in Japan and Gongpyo (공표(공標), ball mark) in Korea, the symbols "◯" or "⭕" are used to represent affirmation in East Asia.
In the Netherlands a 'V' is used to show that things are missing while the flourish of approval (or krul) is used for approving a section or sum.
Today I learned about "the flourish of approval"!
The plot thickens. There is a symbol called "dele" or "deleatur". It is eerily similar to the Dutch "krul" (flourish of approval).
But, the "dele" – as the name implies – means that something is marked for deletion. So actually not approved.
Here's a photo showing the Dutch "krul", or "goedkeuringskrul" as the long name appears to be, being used to grade student work. For questions 9 and 10 you can see how a check mark is used to indicate a wrong answer.
A picture of a graded Swedish assignment would look extremely similar.
The difference is that the "krul" would be a cursive "R". Which also is not far from how the krul looks, as has been pointed out by others. The check mark for wrong answers would be exactly the same.
If you speak Swedish, "godkeuringskrul" could be translated as "godkännandekrull" or "godkännandekringla". An approval 'curl' or 'squiggle'.
This piqued some interest so I’ll summarize where I am right now. The icon I was working on is related to healtchare and at-home-testing kits for covid 19. An icon would follow between physical and digital objects to indicate to the person they’re in the right place.
Because of constraints it necessarily has to be small. There is a proposed icon for the testing kit itself. To indicate that it is ready for pickup, the idea was to add a checkmark.
I would not have worried much about this had I not been aware that a significant number of users will be elderly and internet novices. The people who, I hypothesize, are most likely to associate the check mark with ”wrong”.
Given this risk, and the fact that there is not enough time to do reliable research, I am wary of adding the check mark. An alternative may be the letters ”OK”.
As this will be used on printed instructions accompanying each testing kit, it’s not an easy change post-decision.
But this insight provided by @alundbergh actually proved really helpful. A checkmark in a box, rather than standalone, carries more meaning.
In short, I am not ready to finalize the icon. I have a few more days. I will try and remember to follow up here. :) But learning more about right/wrong indicators in different cultures will definitely come in useful in many situations ahead.
Love how people are sharing their culture-specific symbols in this thread:
1. Last week I got this question from a consultancy: "Is it really necessary with Help functionality for this medical application? It is our assessment that UI should be built so a Help function is not needed."
I'm glad it wasn't asked to my face because I wanted to scream.
2. There are many people with both temporary and permanent cognitive impairments who need help in getting started and reminded. People with vision loss and a variety of neurological disorders are often helped by clear guidance and explanations.
3. Saying it should be "simple enough for no help to be required" unfortunately puts on display a lack of understanding for a broader population and the various needs of different people. Without help functionality fewer people will be able to use your service.
1. I love the idea of Ikigai, but more so the original concept than the recent, western pop-version.
I bet many are familiar with the venn diagram showing the intersection of
* what you love
* what you are good at
* what the world needs and
* what you can be paid for
2. That diagram was originally just a concept for life purpose and not really related to Ikigai (at all)
The western, capitalist remake of course moved the focus away from human experience to growth of capital, as if these concepts are necessarily intertwined.
3. In reality Ikigai is about
* a life worth living, the happiness and benefit of being alive, and
* something to live for, the joy and goal of living
1: Today I have listened in on #Clubhouse rooms with participants who
* have speech impediments after traumatic brain injury (TBI)
* are deaf / hard-of-hearing
* are blind or have visual impairments
Here is what I have learned:
2: Rooms are much more inclusive when people who speak always start by saying “This is NAME” and when they are done speaking clearly say “I am done speaking.”
Here is why:
3: A) Some people use closed caption systems that transcribe speech to text (or to e.g. a braille reader). Without expressed clarity on who is speaking there is just one stream of text without context, because these systems do not always differentiate voices.
Does Google/Alphabet scan your messages in Gmail for showing targeted ads? No.
Does Google/Alphabet scan your messages in Gmail for other purposes? Yes.
Are there other risks with Gmail? Yes.
Thread ->
The notion 'Gmail scans your e-mails to show ads' is still often being repeated as truth in articles and other reporting, even as Google announced in June 2017 that Consumer Gmail content would no longer be used or scanned for any ads personalisation.
This allows Google to appear benevolent when talking about Gmail in these terms, as CEO Sundar Pichai did earlier this week when stating: "We don't use data from Gmail for ads, Congressman".
Feel free to add your own favorites from any language.
1. Ingen ko på isen = No cow on the ice = No worries.
2. Ana ugglor i mossen = suspect owls in the bog (marsh) = I think there is something suspicious going on
3. Nu har du skitit i det blå skåpet = Now you've taken a shit in the blue cabinet = You're in trouble OR you've gone too far OR things have just taken a turn for the worse
2020 has definitely taken a shit in the blue cabinet.