BREAKING: At the request of abortion activists, @Google has just BANNED all of @LiveAction's pro-life ads, including those promoting the Abortion Pill Reversal treatment, a resource that has saved 2500 children to date.
RT!
.@Google has also banned the promotion of our Baby Olivia video, a medically accurate (& accredited by OBGYNs), lifelike animation of human development in the womb, citing “unreliable claims.”
This is the video banned from ads:
Unacceptable.
The now-banned Abortion Pill Reversal ads had been approved by @Google & running for over 4 months, spending over $170,000 & directing 100s of moms to the abortion pill reversal hotline
Abortion activists knew the ads were making a difference, so they had Google shut them down
Meanwhile, Google is permitting abortion facilities to advertise next-day abortions & abortion via mail
This is a blatant, political double standard: Google is ok with ads promoting life-ending drugs, but not life-saving treatments.
The Daily Beast and other pro-abortion groups wrote a hit piece on Live Action’s pro-life ads & demanded Google ban all Live Action ads
@Google reps have yet to respond to our request for an explanation for how Baby Olivia or Abortion Pill Reversal ads violate policies.
They aren’t hiding their bias anymore: @Google’s censorship of critical pro-life information shows a blatant double standard & reckless disregard for human life & women's health.
Google must fairly apply its own policies & immediately restore pro-life ads.
RT if you agree!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dr. Ronna Jurow, an ob-gyn who previously worked at Planned Parenthood and describes herself as "pro-choice," told Fox News Thursday that "there's no question" the fetus would be alive during tissue collection.
"It was repulsive to watch live fetuses being packed in ice while still moving and trying to breathe and move, then being rushed to some laboratory and hear a medical student later discuss the experience of examining various organs of a once-live baby."
THREAD: This is the most important abortion related case in years. We are long overdue for the SCOTUS to revisit Roe v. Wade & PP v. Casey—cases that have led to the death of over 60 million innocent children & led many women & men to lifelong regret. cnbc.com/2021/05/17/sup…
The Supreme Court must acknowledge what science has long revealed: that a unique and individual human life begins at the moment of fertilization. They must recognize that the arbitrary line of viability is an ever changing goalpost as science and technology advance,
and a child’s ability to survive outside the womb should not determine his or her humanity or right to not be murdered in a violent abortion. Every child, including a baby ‘pre-viability” should be protected from the horrors of abortion and the abortion industry.
Amy Coney Barrett is a brilliant lawyer, academic, jurist, and mother of 7 children.
I’ve already seen dozens of comments from “progressive" reporters and leaders attacking her faith, calling her a “handmaid,” questioning her adopted children, and even wondering how she...
...could possibly be a successful justice because she has 7 children.
When Barrett was going through nomination hearings for her position as a federal judge 3 years ago, my own Senator @SenFeinstein grilled her on her faith & said,
“The dogma lives loudly within you.”
She went on to explain that she found Barrett “controversial” because "women really recognize the value of finally being able to control our reproductive systems”
She is, of course, referring to abortion & Roe v Wade
That is her concern: Would Barrett want to undo Roe?
It’s crucial to understand forced sterilization in its historical and present-day context as a population control weapon, wielded by the powerful against the vulnerable. Low-income and minority women bear the brunt of this assault on human rights. Some things to know:
.@PPFA's founder, Margaret Sanger, advocated for forced sterilizations of the “unfit” — minority, low income, and disadvantaged women and girls.
Sanger wrote in her Birth Control Review that parents should “apply for babies as immigrants have to apply for visas.”
Planned Parenthood’s @PPFA advocacy for forced sterilization led to the decades-long practice of these brutal human rights violationsin the United States. In as late as 1968, North Carolina’s forcibly sterilized Black 14-year-old rape survivor Elaine Riddick.
Chomsky's (& George’s) premise is false. The options are not either Fascism or speech without rules. It’s clear that we already place very strict limits on some forms of speech. Sedition, false alarms, defamation. We have those limits and do not live in a Stalinist legal regime.
Any society that still has its sense recognizes that certain kinds of speech war against the good. Just like defamation and false alarms, arguing for the sexual exploitation of a child – or the murder of a child — should be strictly off limits.
It might boost the abortion industry's ego, but the harm it will inflict on women & children is par for the course from a movement that views women & children as the collateral damage of furthering its agenda.