Facts
1. CoV outbreak near CoV research institute (the John Stewart effect) of CoV found >1000 km to the south in nature but 96% match at WIV
2. No animal from market, city, province, or all of China with CoV. 80,000 tested
3. Single 'Virus Zero' with no posterior diversity
1. CoV outbreak near CoV research institute (the John Stewart effect) of CoV found >1000 km to the south in nature but 96% match at WIV
2. No animal from market, city, province, or all of China with CoV. 80,000 tested
3. Single 'Virus Zero' with no posterior diversity
4. No pre-epidemic seroconversion. 9000+ tested
5. Spike Protein S1/S2 furin site never seen before in >1000 sarbecoviruses
6. CCG-CCG codon dimer never seen before in >1000 sarbecoviruses.
7. Recombination across subgenera to solve #5 & #6 either prohibited or rare.
5. Spike Protein S1/S2 furin site never seen before in >1000 sarbecoviruses
6. CCG-CCG codon dimer never seen before in >1000 sarbecoviruses.
7. Recombination across subgenera to solve #5 & #6 either prohibited or rare.
8. RBD pre-adapted w best amino acid, 99.5%: Replacing every 1 of 200 amino acids of receptor binding region (3800 alternative AAs) leads to a poorer RBD.
9. WIV is only place in world combining 'gain-of-opportunity' CoV collection from nature and 'gain-of-function' research
9. WIV is only place in world combining 'gain-of-opportunity' CoV collection from nature and 'gain-of-function' research
10. 30 separate acts by China, NIH, NIAID, and scientists of 'consciousness of guilt.' Doing something a guilty person would do.
No evidence points to nature and not the lab.
No evidence points to nature and not the lab.
Despite these ten facts, 80% of academic scientists say it definitely came from nature.
Despite these 10 facts, the other 20% of academic scientists say, we don't have enough info, it could be either natural or a lab leak, and so let's continue investigating
Despite these 10 facts, the other 20% of academic scientists say, we don't have enough info, it could be either natural or a lab leak, and so let's continue investigating
In seeking justice for the MMs killed by COVID, is there a moral difference between the position these two groups of scientists are taking?
No;
both are complicit in not offering a truthful assessment of where the facts lead & following the science to stop the next virus
No;
both are complicit in not offering a truthful assessment of where the facts lead & following the science to stop the next virus
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
