Why #AUKUS π¦πΊπ¬π§πΊπΈ?
Because, as George Liska taught us long ago, "alliances are against, and only derivatively for, someone or something".
In other words, π¨π³
Because, as George Liska taught us long ago, "alliances are against, and only derivatively for, someone or something".
In other words, π¨π³
https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1438249673270104070
Broadly speaking, the pact is about getting their "nuclear war plans" aligned, which is spot on with the argument of my @CornellPress book
amazon.com/Arguing-about-β¦
amazon.com/Arguing-about-β¦
The creation of this pact is especially intriguing when considered alongside the failure of another possible pact: π¦πΊπ«π·
https://twitter.com/StuartKLau/status/1438269647867031559
Overall, this is a major step towards the Biden administration creating it's "Alliance of Democracies" (a goal, coincidentally, it shared with the Trump Administration)
thechicagocouncil.org/commentary-andβ¦
thechicagocouncil.org/commentary-andβ¦
Exactly how "major" is the the step?
The below thread offers useful details on how the agreement will shape the integration of the three countries' defense industries (#PEofSecurity)
The below thread offers useful details on how the agreement will shape the integration of the three countries' defense industries (#PEofSecurity)
https://twitter.com/TomTugendhat/status/1438273128245907460
Oh, and about the failure of that potential pact between π«π· & π¦πΊ ? Well π¬
https://twitter.com/MacaesBruno/status/1438290920424853508
Final thought: What Biden said in the first tweet of this thread -- that allies are the greatest strength of the US -- is consistent with the argument found in @MiraRappHooper's recent book (but, again, don't say that to π«π· at the moment π€«).
amazon.com/Shields-Republβ¦
amazon.com/Shields-Republβ¦
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
γ
