I know educators have engaged with Clare Foxs battle of ideas, but Fox and Furedi are in deep with a lot of covid disinformation groups, conspiracy theorists, ppl organising antivax protests at school gates
Jenny Bristow, was in HART now in Collateral Global,
Liz Cole UsForThem spreading disinformation knowing it will encourage protest and abuse at school gates
Dodworth another working with HART and other disinfo/anti vax groups
Above are speakers at the next Battle of Ideas
Of course Fox and Furedi are there, as is Toby Young,
Hinton, another HART member and colleague of Yeadon, if you aren't familiar with Yeadon just search the name and youll find plenty of examples of him saying covid vaccines are genocidal deliberate depopulation
Appearing at this event lends credibility to these people
Looks like this Battle of ideas, looks less like a battle and more like a choir of covid skeptics who are working with those threatening to bring violence to nurses and educators.
Look at the kind of stuff these people are up to, do you really want to be associated with this?
To increase to profile of these people by appearing at the same event?
The Spiked crowd are really trying to ramp up anger at schools by spreading letters from campaigns whose websites contain clear disinformation and links to some really unpleasant stuff.
What really pisses me off is that there is a section of #edutwitter which regularly attacks NEU saying the union endorses abuse of teachers on a number of issues ecause particulate comments made by the No exclusions group who aren't part of the union but does have NEU members
They point to the democratically voted call for a moratorium, and despite Mary and Kevin repeatedly pointing out that Safeguarding comes first certain Educelebs keep making out that the NEU would ignore Safeguarding of students and staff
Regular outrage,red line crossed for them
Some will be speaking at Battle of Ideas with the those spreading disinformation, provoking abuse and protest outside schools, others will attend, many will tweet about what a great event it was
This isn't theoretical issues of an exclusion mortitorium
This is happening now
I bet we see no outrage from those Educelebs, they will either ignore this thread or rush to eachothers defense if this gets noticed.
They were adamant NEU should distance itself from NME,now they need to distance themselves from Battle of Ideas
So let's see if they really care about protecting educators and students from abuse or if they were actually more concerned with attacking the NEU?
Cambridge Analytica, GBD, Collateral Global, Pandata, UsForThem, BIRD, HART, Truth for Health Foundation, Daily Skeptic, Law or Fiction, PCRclaims, Spiked etc #r4today@mrjamesob@LBC
Study suggests worrying rate of covid evolution
⚠️Only a preprint, but potentially huge ramifications
Many other preprints have made headline, but I suspect this one isn't positive enough
Of all the papers why did #r4today decide that the one person worth quoting directly was Dingwall of all ppl?
Conspiracy theorists and antivaxxers Yeadon and Bernard who produce disinformation on an industrial scale referred to him as their man on the inside @bbcnickrobinson?
Why are Tory MPs working with UsForThem who admit their involvement and joint members with HART?
HART were the ones spreading that vaccines cause infertility, biomagnatism and are 99% graphite oxide etc
Why is the media wilfully ignoring this? #r4today
Bloody bored of mainstream UK media wringing hands over disinformation on social media when they refuse to acknowledge the significance role they playing by platforming and distributing those behind the disinformation
2/ Have to consider the mentality of the people at the top of the skeptic ponzi pyramid.
Guibilini of GBD/Collateral Global, coauthor of Guptas studies, in 2012 argued for "after birth abortion" as babies don't count as ppl because they don't have aims amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
3/ Guibilini's definition of what makes a "real human" would discout people with certain disabilities
Eugenics gets thrown around a lot in some areas of Twitter, however this IS Eugenics
🧵That report based on VAERs thats recieved a lot of condemnation.
Few things about it has come to my attention...
2/ First off, the prominence of the report in the UK media compared to other studies does smell suspicious.
Not suprised Camilla Turner in Telegraph was one of the first to push it, she's been in touch with UsForThem for over a year
3/ Turners article was published less than 2 hours after the report was put out, interesting to see besides GBD/Collateral Global characters, who else was quick to take the study seriously