I don't personally use or follow a strict checklist. I certainly don't think it could be used as a screening tool. But here are some general criteria I like to see in an investment.
1/ A founder-led/owner operator business with high insider ownership & a focus on long-term, intrinsic value per share growth. Ideally I'd like the CEO to have a majority of their net worth invested in the company.
2/ A sustainable competitive advantage & moat. Preferably in an industry with high barriers of entry, a low cost production advantage & pricing power. Ideally they are able to disrupt the industry.
3/ Strong organic & inorganic growth. Preferably in a fragmented industry in which value accretive acquisitions are a possibility. A large & growing TAM in which they are market leaders and/or have the ability to control a large % of market share in the future.
4/ A relative small market-cap with a long runway for growth. Ideally a company between $100m - $2Bn. I am always willing to go smaller or larger for the right opportunity. But an illiquid security thats hard to access for institutional investors is a bonus.
5/ Exceptional capital allocation. Management with a proven track record of allocating capital. High returns on equity, buybacks at low multiples, only diluting to create value, reinvesting earnings for long-term value creation etc.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread/ $HIFS - A high quality, small-cap bank with exceptional management.
1/ Hingham Institution for Savings was founded in 1834 as a mutual savings bank in Boston, Massachusetts. It eventually listed in 1988.
2/ $HIFS currently have 11 locations, 8 of which are in the South Shore of Massachusetts. The have also recently expanded into Washington D.C in which management recognise as a similar market and a growth opportunity.
3/ Currently $HIFS has a market cap of $680M. Since 1993 when the Gaughen family took full control of the bank, the stock has returned 100-1 for shareholders. Pretty impressive considering how small the company still is.
Thread/ $BABA news on the CCP breaking up Alipay lending business.
1/ The media and fintwit are again jumping on the news and pushing an overly negative spin on the impact of the CCP breaking up the Ant Group’s credit/lending business.
2/ it was announced that the CCP plans to break up Ant Group's Alipay and create a separate app for the loans business, the Financial Times reported.
3/ The plan will also result in Ant turning over the user data that underpins lending decisions to a new credit scoring joint-venture that will be partly state-owned.
$BABA returns on incremental invested capital (ROIIC) over past 9yrs is ~18%. Over the past 3yrs it was ~19%. Reinvestment rate over the same time periods was 130% & 102%. That has lead to intrinsic value compounding of 23% & 19% respectively
1/ With Alibaba Cloud requiring a lot of capital and just beginning to approach profitability, I have no reason to believe $BABA won't maintain a similar reinvestment rate & returns over the next 5 years..
2/ The core commerce business will continue to be extremely profitable and produce strong cash flows & returns for the business. I think it's hard to argue otherwise, regardless of any upcoming government crackdowns & interventions.
Alibaba cloud is arguably the most bullish aspect of the $BABA thesis even though it’s <10% of FY21 total revenues and not yet profitable. Currently they have ~40% of cloud market share in China.
1/ The cloud market in China is only in early stages of development. They are approximately 5-6 years behind the US if they can replicate the same growth trends that a company like $AMZN has been able to achieve with AWS.
2/ the US and Chinese cloud market is very different and not a perfect comparison. But $AMZN & $BABA are the dominant players in each market so I will make some comparisons throughout the thread.
$SHVA operates payments systems for debit cards and mobile payments (Apple & Google pay) in Israel. If it traded on any major exchange would likely be >2x the current price.
1/ first note is that $V & $MA are not competition. They don’t compete in the market and actually own ~10% of $SHVA shares each. The company was founded by Israeli banks.
2/ Shares are very illiquid. Large share holders such as the banks, Visa & MasterCard own ~60% of the company. The illiquidity is the main reason the company trades and such low multiples. Trading on Tel Aviv stock exchange doesn’t help either.
Thread/ $BABA recently announced a 100B RMB contribution to common prosperity in China. The equivalent of $15.5B (USD).
Here is a bit of a deeper look and the impact in may have on Alibaba…
1/ firstly, I want to clarify the wording that was used. The $15B would be “an investment in science and technology to support small and medium-sized companies to enter the global market, increase employment rates and help reduce inequality between urban and rural digital life”
2/ $BABA will spread the money between 10 initiatives over the next 4-5 years. Unlike $TCEHY who did not give a time frame on their contribution, Alibaba have an end date of 2025. Both of the tech giants pledged the same ~$15.5B amount.