'So Where Has Your Pension Gone?' for Dummies.

The Revenue Commissioners, The Department of Social Welfare and the Social Welfare Appeals Office conspired with Employer Representatives to label employees as self-employed in order for individual businesses, entire sectors and
the State itself, to evade employers PRSI.

The method used to achieve this tax evasion, is #bogusselfemployment. The Revenue Commissioners and the SWAO and the SW Department label groups and classes of workers as 'self-employed' using unlawful 'Test Cases'.

The loss in PRSI
and Taxes is estimated to be in excess of 1 billion euro each and every year.

From 1995 until January 2019, the Department of SW and the SWAO openly admitted, in writing, to using test cases and the approach of test cases to label groups and classes of workers as Self Employed.
The Department SW openly admits that there is no legislation to allow decisions by group and by class.

The Revenue Commissioners deny that they use test cases. Instead, the Revenue Commissioners claim that they are 'Acting in Uniform' with SWAO 'Test Cases'. This is a classic
'Civil Serviceism', Revenue are saying that they are not acting on test cases but instead are acting 'in uniform' with Dept. SW 'test cases'.

This billion a year tax evasion has been going on for approx 30 years (probably longer).

And that's where your pension has gone.
Earlier this year, the Public Accounts Committee ordered a fully independent investigation from an outside agency into the Revenue Commissioner's role in labelling all couriers as self-employed since a 1995 'test case'.

The Department of SW and the Social Welfare Appeals Office
vehemently denied the use of test cases to the SW Committee in December 2019.

Earlier this year, SIPO ruled that the Chief Appeals Officer of the SWAO had given 'Erroneous Information' to the SW Committee in denying the use of 'test cases' during her tenure.

A Dail reply from
the Current SW Minister, where the Minister once again denies the classification of workers by group and by class, has been referred to the the Committee on Procedure and Oversight by the Ceann Comhairle.

The Dept SW is also due before the PAC to answer questions in relation
That should be the committee on Privileges and Oversight.

Anyway, when Pascal tells you that you have to work until you drop, remember why, it's because they robbed your pension fund, right in front of your nose, and nobody gives a damn.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with martinmcmahon

martinmcmahon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @williamhboney1

17 Sep
Either ...
twitter ...
is glitchy ...
Read 5 tweets
17 Sep
I’m not letting this go, the Chief Appeals Officer of the Social Welfare Appeals Office deliberately lied to the SW Committee about the use of test cases.

I made a complaint to SIPO that the CAO deliberately lied.

SIPO ruled that the CAO did give ‘erroneous information’ to
the Committee. The Social Welfare Appeals Office DOES use unlawful test cases to determine employment status by group and by class.

In July this year, the current SW minister, @HHumphreysFG repeated this lie in a Dail reply to Paul Murphy.

The Ceann Comhairle has now
referred the Minister’s Dail reply to the Committee on Privileges and oversight.

There must be accountability for the Chief Appeals Officer’s lie. The lie costs the taxpayer 1 billion euro each and every year. It is fraud, deliberate fraud, covered up by the CAO and Munister
Read 4 tweets
30 Apr
#RTE in the Public Accounts Committee 27th April 2021.

Issues regarding #BogusSelfEmployment Analysis -

The first pertinent question on @bogusselfemployment was from @PaulMcauliffe. Paul asked about the Eversheds Sutherland report which had found 157 'contractors' out of 433
@PaulMcauliffe were misclassified as 'Self-employed'. That's a very high rate of misclassification, slightly over 36%.

Paul specifically asked if @RTE had robustly responded and if @rte was correctly complying with Revenue guidelines.

@RTE's HR director confirmed the results of the Eversheds
@PaulMcauliffe @rte Sutherland report and stated that reviews and meetings with managers had taken place to ensure compliance 'Going Forward'

But that doesn't exactly answer the question Paul asked, the true factual position is that @RTE was NOT compliant with regulations and not compliant spanning
Read 28 tweets
3 Mar
Revenue finally replied in writing to the questions asked by the Public Accounts Committee about #bogusselfemployment. The reply is dated February 2021 and I will be sharing it on this thread later tonight. It confirms every single word of this thread to date and drops SW in it.
The first question from the PAC was -

"A test case regarding bogus self employment amongst couriers was discussed. Please provide further details in relation to this case including detailing any associated costs"
Revenue replied with -

"There is no one specific “test” case.
However, couriers were regarded as self employed for PRSI purposes as a result of a Social Welfare
Appeals OfficerOfficer’s decision. In the interest of uniformity Revenue decided, >
Read 174 tweets
25 Nov 20
I'm bored so I'm going to tell you a story.

Way back in the mists of time (late 70's), PAYE workers held some of the most militant strikes ever seen in Ireland.

They demand a more equitable taxation system for workers. Workers paid income tax through the Pay As >
You Earn (PAYE) scheme, tax and PRSI deducted directly from your wages.

The failure of Fianna Fáil to introduce increased taxation for prosperous farmers and wealthier members of society was the issue. Workers, PAYE employees, correctly felt that they were shouldering the
tax burden of running the country. One of the big issues was that the self-employed were getting away with murder on taxation and the figures showed that indeed was the case.

Workers were fighting to replace an unjust tax system and to ensure that the wealthy paid >
Read 194 tweets
23 Nov 20
Can't sleep, damn insomnia. Thoughts running so I'll share. Tomorrow marks 17 days since the DPC told me that my complaint about the PSC travel pass being used as a tool of mass surveillance, was valid.

It's 2 weeks since I emailed the DPC and said I didn't want it included in
with the current DPC case re the PSC as it had nothing to do with it. A travel pass is one of those functions which the Social Welfare is allowed use the PSC.

The 2 weeks is important because that's the time limit to act once the complaint is deemed valid, there's a precedent
somewhere.

Anywho, I'm mulling over the individual number of data protection/GDPR breaches involved. So, you have a travel pass and you get on public transport. The PSC travel pass is supplied by dept SW. It has your name, a biometric photo and on the magnetic strip is a
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(