If you've got a bio that looks like this and you're following me, please unfollow. Your unscientific, creepy, extremist fringe gender ideology is a threat to my existence, and most especially to children like the child I used to be. I can neither countenance nor abide that Twitter bio with the userna...
Dude whose bio that is has a pinned thread about how sad he is that the women he work with don't know what a woman is and that he's not allowed to correct them. Gender zealotry is a heck of a drug.
The greatest lie the devil ever told is that the people who are trying to rebuild the gender binary in reinforced concrete are "gender critical".
And I'm serious. If you're "gender critical" or had a "peak trans" moment or think that conversion therapy for trans kids is "evidence based" or "scientific" or whatever, and you're following me... stop. Don't. Go away. Fuck off directly into the sea, or at least unfollow.
I'm not sure if dude didn't know I was trans when he followed me or if I am quiet and polite enough about being trans that he assumed I was "one of the good ones".

Let me set the record queer: I am not one of the good ones.
I grew up in a tiny town that statistically you haven't heard of. Think of the smallest place you can think of in Nebraska. Which is probably Omaha, the only place you can think of in Nebraska.

Yeah, I'm from Not Omaha.
I grew up in Not Omaha, Nebraska. In a town so small our school district was one building, K-12 inclusive. The modern internet wasn't a thing when I was a kid and was barely a thing when I was a teen.
My sources of information about transness as a thing that existed were a Mad Magazine parody of Silence of the Lambs, Ace Venture, exactly one episode of Night Court and one episode of The John Larroquette Show that partly recycled the Night Court script.
As a tiny child I knew I was a girl and was confused and concerned that others didn't know it, but also I had a severe speech impediment and wasn't always able to make myself understood, it was frustrating to try for anything complicated or important.
My first dream I had that I remembered -- this was before Kindergarten so I was four years old or younger -- involved having a doctor informing my parents that there had been a mistake and I was a girl, and then "fixing me", physically.
It was a dream and I was a preschooler so this involved using a chunky plastic screwdriver and saw like I had on my Little Tykes toy tool bench. I'll spare you the exact details. It was surreal at the time and now, but it wasn't a nightmare. It was a good dream.
I got a little bit older and started schools and had the gender binary beamed into my head with sharp words and death glares and social isolation until I stopped trying to play with other girls, stopped playing with girly things, stopped talking about being a girl.
Now the "Gender Crits" will jump on that and go, "Oh, you think there are girl toys and boy toys? You think you have to be a girl to play with girls? We would have SAVED YOU, by telling you that you could do those things as a boy."
But to jump on that part, they have to skip over the part where I knew I was a girl, before I ever went to school or really interacted with people outside my immediate circle. I didn't decide I was a girl because I liked "girl stuff". I was a girl and I liked "girl stuff".
My parents definitely didn't "trans me". The "Gender Crits" would demand that my parents must have done something wrong, but what they did was what the Crits say they would do: let me play with whatever toys I wanted, play whatever games I wanted. Dress up. House, etc.
My mother explaining the (reductive, cissexist, binaristic) "physical difference between boys and girls" in age-appropriate terms actually directly preceded my dream about the doctor fixing me.
Now, the "Gender Crits" would probably also jump on that dream as evidence that there was some pervasive, all-encompassing "trans agenda" all the way back in the early 80s, but I swear to you I had no opportunity to learn about trans surgery stuff as a toddler.
Anyway, school taught me that it wasn't safe to be a girl, which made it, from a survival point of view, convenient to repress that.

And then I learned about being gay, which *at first* I learned meant being stupid, terrible, lame, unwanted, and basically anything else negative.
(True story: I was taunted for being a "lesbian" on the playground long before I was ever taunted with the f-slur. Gender Crits can't always tell, but other kinds of bullies often can.)
When I learned that "gay" referred to a type of person, and that this type of person was sexually oriented in a way that blurred the strict gender binary, and that gay men were often effeminate and sometimes play-acted as women... I thought, hey, I guess that's me, right?
When I told this story to a "Gay Not Queer" "Gender Crit" person on Tumblr, who was sharing his story of how he'd been "almost transed" and was happy as a gay man, his response was, "So you admit you were a gay man who was converted into a straight woman by transing."
I thought we could relate to having explored the wrong identity first because of what society happened to present with us, and I could talk him around to it being better for children to have *all* the information, not just whatever breaks through the filters adults put up.
Anyway. So I thought I was gay, and I thought that was a step up because it was a real thing a person could be. What *very limited* information I had about transness, mostly presented it as just an extreme case of gayness, which I supposed must be the case.
When we got the internet -- this was dial-up on not-great phone lines -- I took to looking for information on queerness when everyone else in the family was asleep. I would skip going to the bathroom before going to bed to make sure I wouldn't fall asleep too early.
And one thing I found was archives of gay erotica (text-based) from usenets and BBSes and things, which felt safer than looking at visual porn, and certainly loaded more quickly, and was more informative.
And it was a little confusing to me that I was as interested in the lesbian categories as the gay male ones, if not more so, but really caught my eye was the trans ones... which were usually things like forced feminization, sissification, bimbofication. Not super edifying stuff.
This is where the Gender Crits jump in with "Aha! So they admit they have an autogynephilia fetish!" And no, you half-empty jars of moldy chutney, I admit I was a teenager without any better source of representation, information, or validation than fetish board archives.
And as you can imagine this was not terribly helpful in terms of allowing me to figure things out. What DID help is when I was about 18 and I started hanging out in a trans chatroom, learning that there actually are differences (albeit porous in places) between trans and drag...
...and people with cross-dressing fetish and so on, and hearing other people who'd gone through a similar journey of confusion. I was still figuring things out when I left for college, and when I left college.
I had known I was a girl before I was in kindergarten, but I'd had a decade and a half of society reinforcing the cis version of the gender binary, the version that "Gender Criticals" worship and want to enforce as holy law, and it took years to get past that.
I don't want other kids to go through that. And that's not even touching on the horrors of dysphoria and being forced to go through the wrong puberty. Just the psychological journey and the scars it left me with.
Nobody wants to "trans" your kid. "Transing" isn't a thing that happens to people, outside of some very peculiar and highly particular forms of fetish fiction.

What we want is for kids who might be trans to not have to learn about it from fetish porn and movie parodies.
I mean, thinking I was a gay boy in a small town... being seen as one, suspected as one... was no picnic. I also have scars from trying to suppress homosexuality that I don't in fact have! It's messed up! I don't want any kids to go through that, either.
This is why kids should be taught about gayness, and about transness, and about queerness in general. Not teaching them about isn't going to stop any of them from being queer, but it will mess up the queer ones.

And heck, it messes up the rest, too.
You *might* luck out and get a kid who is accepting of other people after you spend their whole childhood hiding the existence of those other people from them like it's a dirty shameful sexually perverse secret... but if so, that's in spite of your parenting, not because of it.
I don't think there was a kid in my class who knew what "gay" meant apart from being an insult for anything uncool, gross, and unwanted, before they knew as an insult that meant those things. They heard older kids use it disparagingly and picked it up.
"But you're asking me to disbelieve evidence and science."

No, I'm not. I'm asking you to reject a harmful and limiting framework you've been using to interpret the evidence that's available to you.

Pronouns don't have chromosomes, Brenda.
If you could somehow, today, scrub every mention of transness, every trace of transness, from all of the media and records and human memory and human existence, there would be kids born tomorrow who were trans, just like I was, and who would be just as lost and scared as I was.
The push to eliminate transness -- to "morally mandate" an end to our existence and effectively ban us from public life -- is cruel and random violence that is inflicted on people, on children, who need information and support.
The push to eliminate transness comes from the same place as homophobia, from the same impulses towards sexual and social control and reducing humanity to two ironclad, concrete, and immutable gender roles. It's the same thing. The same deal from start to finish
And it is deeply unscientific. It ignores the evidence, the evidence that we EXIST.

You can deny anything you want. No one can stop you. You can deny that the earth revolves around the sun. Eppur si muove.
Maybe I don't come off as trans or maybe I come off as "one of the good ones" -- the moderate, well-behaved unqueer trans who would happily sign your petition to ban me from public existence -- because I don't talk about this enough, and if I don't, it's because I have scars.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexandra Erin

Alexandra Erin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexandraErin

20 Sep
This, and also the cities exist, by and large, because we *need* a city to be there, for shipping routes and access to resources. It's like blaming people for having "shitty jobs". The alternative is those jobs don't get done.
"Why do they keep rebuilding New Orleans? Why not pick somewhere without hurricanes?"

You mean, why don't they pick up *the harbor* and move it inland? We should just put all our shipping ports in the mountains and then it doesn't matter if sea levels rise. Boom, I solved it.
The fact that New Orleans is people's homes and history and culture cannot be overlooked, but also, it's not a coincidence that people happened to settle down where our big navigable river meets the sea.
Read 6 tweets
20 Sep
Yes, this.

And the thing is that as a writer I don't think this is terrible, or fully avoidable.

Like, if the audience could suddenly see directly into the wings at a stage play, it would also change things quite a bit.
Fiction writers will never be able to create a fully realized, fully functional, living and breathing and completely detailed world for the same reason that cartographers don't build planets. The best you can do is be aware of where the spackle is and don't make it load-bearing.
So much this. "No-Maj" is the single most tweely British thing in the books.
Read 25 tweets
20 Sep
LRT: The number of people who read Jay Kay's books and concluded that the purebloods must have a point about blood purity meaning *something* or it wouldn't have been in the book has changed how I think about depictions of evil in my work.
I.e., if you're going to have a tropey allegory for some real-world evil, it's not enough to just attach it to The Very Obviously Bad Guys and expect that everyone will get the point that the belief is foolish and wrong in the world of the story.
In small and large ways, the Wizarding World's obsession with blood purity (and "the right sorts of families" and all the connected ideas) matches with and maps onto widespread beliefs and prejudices in the real world.
Read 15 tweets
19 Sep
I unironically think that arms back or folded in front of them would be the answer. A centaur's arms would not meaningfully contribute to balance and I don't think they could easily perform a reciprocal motion to the gallop anyway. Best to just keep them out of the way.
I am not an expert on running, galloping, centaurs, balance, momentum, or balance so I could be wrong here. I think streamlined out of the way would be the best answer, but when charging into battle... well, real horses have the wind resistance of a cavalry officer's arms, too.
Read 6 tweets
19 Sep
Just saw an antivaxer say that everybody who died of covid was on their death bed. With a few exceptions (like that person who fell over dead on a ladder), he's not wrong. When you're in bed and dying of covid, the bed you're in is your deathbed.
And I know I'm being glib here, but the thing is, from the beginning, absolute spoon drawers on here have been going "Why not just isolate the vulnerable instead of requiring HEALTHY people to change?" as though "the vulnerable" is a distinct class. It's not.
And the idea that a death bed is some special thing in and of itself that some people are on, so you don't have to worry about covid until you're on your death bed... you don't know if it's your death bed or not. No one does until you die.
Read 4 tweets
19 Sep
Somewhere between 35,000 and 50,000. Felt amazing, 5/0 stars, would not recommend.
I've actually done this multiple times, always with either fetish fiction that is really specific to the point of incomprehensible absurdity or unworkably complex drafts for a tabletop roleplaying game.
It's basically a matter of being hyperfixated on getting something I've been thinking about a lot for a long time out of my head. Doing that sparks more ideas, I hyperfixate, and my brain won't quiet down long enough for me to feel tired or sleep.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(