6. The continued legacy of incautious, on-the-hoof, top-down domestic and global Covid policy.
7. Deepening public scepticism of globalism and technocracy, causing the coalescence of new protest and political movements.
8. Other emerging internal dynamics dynamics: NvS & EvW EU splits; polarisation of domestic politics under feckless leadership (Canada & US); France on brink of historic political shift.
9. Post-Afghanistan loss of credibility for 'partners'.
10. BRICS economies fully emerging, and other countries becoming increasingly independent, wealthy and ambitious for development, in comparison with earlier COP meetings.
We could call them ten (and counting) black swans.
11. Chairs of remote global technocratic political bodies, waving around modelling studies and declaring "code red for humanity" isn't as compelling in the 2020s as it was in the 2010s.
Agency capture is now well established in ordinary political understanding.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Before I argued against stupid climate policy, I argued for it. But I was very young.
It was listening to greens -- and watching them -- that made me pivot to climate scepticism and then to broader criticism of political environmentalism.
What kind of world do they want?
They do not simply want a world in which there is no global warming.
None of them.
*All* of them -- from Greta and the XR, up through to the Chief Scientific Advisor and scientific research institutions -- want to change society.
He's made a fortune out of the excessive prices inflicted on the consumer by government policy.
The price cap was created because the government lost control of the energy market to its ideological ambitions...
The price cap was necessary because the EMR bill failed to address the problems created by the climate change act.
Policy let any fly-by-night spiv set himself up as a boutique energy retailer. All you needed was an iPad and a shed. See also cold-calling and doorstep-selling.
Vince rails against nuclear at the end, claiming that it's more expensive than the market cost.
Well, that's because it was overseen by a Minister who was ideologically preoccupied by wind, like his predecessors and his party.