Worryingly SOME schools are referring parents who have refused to return their children to in-person education (due to the absence of scientifically recognised mitigations) to social services under ‘safeguarding’ reasons.
These schools know that fining parents will not force them to return their children.
These schools know that punitive measures for truancy will not hold up in court and will be costly to pursue - parents have legal representation in place.
These schools know that these parents have never had any safeguarding or attendance issues prior to covid.
These schools know that these parents have understood that their children are NOT missing from education, they are learning remotely and they intend to return when rates are low and mitigations are implemented.
These schools are trying all tactics to coerce deregistration or to bully parents to return children to a setting they know has not mitigated to the lowest practicable level as required by H&S legislation the risk of exposure to infection.
The cases where this has happened to two of our founding members have been dismissed immediately by social services as ‘malicious referrals’ and reports can now be sent to CQC
Is this what resources and overworked social workers should be focussed on?
Is this a waste of finite resources?
Will these kinds of unnecessary referrals mean other REAL issues of neglect and safeguarding will be missed? mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/c…
The above article makes ref to school uniforms so we can safely assume those kids are on roll somewhere
Did their Heads hound those parents relentlessly?
Did their Heads pop up unexpectedly at their front doors for welfare checks?
Did those Heads refer immediately to SS or LA for safeguarding issues?
Parents remaining remote are being ironically investigated for safeguarding. When the very reason they’re keeping their kids home is for SAFEGUARDING concerns!
Valuable, overstretched and finite resources have been diverted into investigating families taking reasonable steps to safeguard children’s wellbeing during covid.
Meanwhile the impact is felt elsewhere as serious cases of significant harm are being neglected.
Right now we’re discussing with one of our team of parents the absolutely agonising decision they have to make for Monday.
There are many many parents facing this right now in the U.K.
They’ve kept their primary child remote learning and refused to return them to an indoor setting that has no scientifically recognised mitigations for an airborne virus.
The school already has cases.
The school have given them an ultimatum, that they expect the child in school on Monday or they will start the prosecution process.
(The wording was a little more sinister than that ‘fines or something else’ implying social services referrals??)
We are a grassroots campaign group, following the science and calling for in-person education to NOT unnecessarily and knowingly expose children, staff and their families to increased risk of infection.
🐝
We support all genuine calls for all scientifically recognised mitigations that reduce risk of exposure to infection.
We don’t have a hierarchy.
We don’t have or require funding.
We are outspoken.
We are often direct.
🐝🐝
We are all from varying backgrounds, with different experiences throughout this pandemic.
We believe one size does not fit all with regards to education provision.
We support staff, parents, children and their wider family members and communities who continue to be gaslighted.
TIME TO TACKLE BRITISH EXCEPTIONALIST AND ABHORRENT ABLEIST RHETORIC
Increasingly it seems @educationgovuk , some paediatric professionals, some school leaders, most media journalists and even some parents spout the line that it’s okay for children to be infected because…
1. “Children mostly have a mild infection”
OR
2. “Very few children die”
OR
3. “Children who don’t return to pre-infection health swiftly have underlying conditions “