Alf Profile picture
19 Sep, 8 tweets, 2 min read
People obsess about outright yield levels, but curve shapes are at least equally important.

The US yield curve has been flattening relentlessly since May this year - chart below shows the yield differential between 5y and 30y US bonds.

This is paramount important.

1/n
Yield differentials between short and long-end of the curve inform you about investors’ expectations on interest rates years down the line.

A steep yield curve means investors demand compensation (term premium) to own long bonds vs rolling ownership of short bonds each time
Premium for what risk?
It can be inflation, (real) duration or credit risk.

In this case, the curve has become flatter so investors demand less premium to own long end bonds - the distribution of probabilities of future interest rates has become easier to predict.

What changed?
Credit risk (spread between Treasuries and swaps) has barely moved in 5y and 30y.

Inflation expectations have dropped 20 bps, but that’s true for both 5y and 30y breakevens - the curve should not flatten based on this.

We are left with premium to own duration & real rates.
Indeed, since May real yields have collapsed in 30y (-30 bps) while they have risen in 5y (+20 bps, admittedly from very low levels).

50 bps compression in real yields differentials between 5y and 30y.

This is also clear looking at 5y forward 5y real yields.
What does it mean?
As the global credit impulse peaked in Q4 last year, soft data + earnings estimates + hard data were all destined to peak somewhere around May/June this year.

The script played out nicely.

A bond investor will demand less premium to own long bonds if the economy is slowing.
A bond investor will demand even less premium if the economy is slowing and authorities embark in policy tightening - as the Fed started announcing in summer.

The distribution of future outcomes becomes less uncertain - tightening at peak credit impulse = lower future growth
To conclude: watch yield curvatures and not only outright yield levels.

5s30s flattening this quick means the market is not buying the “runaway inflation fueled by Fed monetizing debt and brrr” narrative.

The end.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alf

Alf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MacroAlf

20 Sep
Evergrande panic? I can almost hear you asking for it...here is your Chinese thread!

From a panoramic macro perspective, chances that a widespread financial market panic unfolds are relatively low - it will mostly depend on the Chinese authorities reaction.

1/n
The chart below shows the % of Chinese households wealth in real estate - 74%, quite high.
For comparison, US households own <30% of their wealth in real estate.

This tells us:

- The Chinese economy is not very financialized
- Real estate matters for the CH household

How much?
74% of wealth concentrated in real estate is quite a lot, yes.
But 74% of what?

The chart below shows Chinese HH net assets (value of assets - liabilities).

In 2019, Chinese household net assets were RMB 500 trn = approx. 70k USD net wealth per each Chinese adult.

Pretty solid
Read 13 tweets
16 Sep
Very unpopular take, but backed by facts.
And I care much more about facts than opinions.

House prices are NOT expensive, when measured as one should reasonably do: in real terms, assuming a 10% down-payment and the remaining 90% financed with a fixed-rate mortgage.

1/4
The median US house price has gone up 2.4x times since 1990.
In real terms, we are looking at a whopping 70% price increase over the last 10 years.

But houses are not paid for 100% in cash.
The median home buyer finances 88% of the house price with a fixed-rate mortgage.

2/4
What's really relevant is how much these mortgage installments weigh on your net monthly income.
The red line in the chart measures just that, with the index = 100 in 1990 for comparison.

So how can (mortgage payments / real wages) be pretty low if house prices are high?

3/4
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep
“Where is the demand for fixed income coming from?”

This question is often asked, and the answer is very simple and accessible to everybody as public info.

Regulation.

Wait, what?

Let me explain with a simple example.

1/8
After 2008, regulators decided banks must hold a large amount of liquid assets to service strong liabilities outflows during a crisis.

These assets are called HQLA (high quality liquid assets) and each bank must own HQLA enough to meet stressed outflows => LCR above 100%. Source: Google
Now, this generally means that banks own around 15% (!) of their balance sheet in HQLA.

Before the LCR regulation, this used to be much smaller as banks were not forced to own that many liquid assets. Source: Google
Read 8 tweets
21 Aug
1/ The most relevant measure of real-economy & (perhaps) inflationary form of money is not M2

It’s the amount of bank deposits held by the non-financial private sector
By you

Bank lending and government deficits (not offset by private sector deleveraging) “create money”, not QE
2/ QE exchanges bonds (asset for the pvt sector) into reserves or bank deposits (assets for the pvt financial sector)

Just an asset swap

You as private person don’t have more bank deposits. At best, few pension funds and asset managers have more bank deposits

Not CPI relevant
3/ When you get a loan or the govt sends you money w/o asking for taxes back…

You have more bank deposits.
Potentially, you could spend them (inflationary form of money)

If it’s a loan, that’s very likely as nobody forces you to take a loan. You chose to

Watch lending data
Read 4 tweets
14 Aug
The gold standard (black box) prevented govt to inject large qty of resources in the private sector (big deficits w/o plans to tax back) and banks to create tons of money (strong lending)

Constraining credit creation conflicts with the very human nature - ''I want all, and now'' Image
After '71 (orange box), credit expansion is a completely elastic process - we can freely expand/contract the amount of money in the system.
Obviously, we choose to expand credit very often.

But sometimes deficit hawks prevail and we ''put deficits under control'' (black arrows)
Keep in mind the pace of change matters - decelerating credit creation is enough to slow down YoY GDP and earnings growth.
When you go into net surplus, you are actively draining resources from the private sector.

See what happens
2000: crisis
2007: crisis
Read 4 tweets
13 Aug
What's QE all about?

When the Fed buys bonds, the asset side of banks balance sheet is changed from
x bonds to
x reserves

Both are assets & have good regulatory/liquidity treatment

But bonds earn you coupons and expose you to market risks and volatility
Reserves don't

1/4
If the Fed buys bonds from non-bank financial institutions (e.g. asset managers), their asset side will be changed from x bonds to x bank deposits

Similar story: bonds earn you carry and expose you to interest rate/convexity/credit spreads risks and vol
Bank deposits don't

2/4
Fin.Inst. need to earn coupons to survive
They also have to be exposed to market risks on the asset side to match/hedge the risks on the liabilities' side of their balance sheet

A pension fund holds long duration liabilities and needs long duration assets to hedge risks

3/4
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(