1 feel listened to
2 grow a community
3 bring people together
4 sow discord amongst alienated people
5 pull alienated people together in cultist, right wing anger
6 create angry community
It is an incredible space to manipulate.
"Thought Reform" is on display on social media, constantly, injected in to movements in order to create discord and splits. To do this, the bad actors need to control the narrative and make people believe sometimes what was the opposite of what they once believed. Edward Hunter
came up with eight criteria to describe how totalitarian regimes/cults go about this.
1 Milieu control. The leader, or a select band, has complete control of information. Isolate people from outside information. People are taught to trust only the internal publications
and diktat and the group becomes self mental police. Think "fake news" and blocklists.
2 Mystical manipulation. Group and individual experiences are contrived, engineered and even staged in a way that makes them seem spontaneous.
3 Demand for purity. Viewing the world in
simple, binary terms-"Black vs White," "good vs evil" and members are told they must strive for perfection. (Eg the attacks on Nicola Sturgeon from certain members of Alba Party for not being as "indy" as them... in fact accusing her of being a British agent).
4 Confession.
Personal boundaries are broken down and destroyed. Every thought, feeling or action -past or present- that does not conform to the groups rules should be shared or confessed either publicly or to a personal monitor. All past divergences will be used by leader or group to control
members whenever they need to be put in line (digging through social media history is a perfect example).
5 Sacred Science. Doctrine is considered to be absolutely, scientifically and morally true... no room for questions or alternative viewpoints. The leader is above criticism.
6 Loading the language. Members learn a new vocabulary that is designed to constrict their thinking in to absolute black and white, thought stopping clichés that conform to group ideology. (Re transphobia , look at various statements about toilets, prisons and of course "adult
human female.")
7 Doctrine over person. Group ideology is privileged far above a members experience, conscience or integrity. If a member doubts or has critical thoughts about those beliefs, it is due to their own shortcomings.
8 Dispensing of existence. Only those who belong
to the group have the right to exist. All members and critics or dissidents do not. This is of course, the most dangerous and defining of the criteria. The language of some re Trans people show the danger of this. And the bile and hatred aimed at Scottish
Green and SNP members on social media of late, really should be concerning.
In addition to this, Margaret Singer, in her book "Cults in Our Midst," identified six conditions for exerting undue influence on people:
1 Keep them unaware of what is happening and how they are being
changed one step at a time
2 Control their social and/or physical environment, especially time
3 Systematically create a sense of personal powerlessness
4 Implement a system of rewards, punishments and experiences that inhibits behaviour that might reflect the person's former
social identity.
5 Implement a system of rewards, punishments and experiences that promotes learning the groups ideology or belief system and group approved behaviours.
6 Put forth a closed system of logic and an authoritarian structure that permits no feedback and cannot be
modified by the leaders.
Remember how positive the independence movement used to be? -if that is a question you ask, perhaps you are stuck in a closed system, controlled by a hierarchy or authoritarian structure. For most of us, the independence movement still IS a positive
one.
Alienation has us naturally seeking groups in which we belong. But there are bad actors who recognise this, and are applying the above criteria -identified by military and totalitarian regimes post WW2- on social media, much in the way political and religious cults do.
Remember, alienation is a product of an unequal society. People are isolated from physical communities that were once the norm. People feel disenchanted and separated from their culture, and feel powerless in their isolation and turn to online, digital life and social media.
In the 1991 book , Age of Propaganda, Aronson and Pratkanis provide a formula on how to lead a cult:
1 create your own social reality by eliminating all sources of info other than that provided by the cult (fake news; lying SNP etc). Provide a picture of your world (eg women's
rights under attack)that members can use to interpret all events.
2 Create an in-group of followers (follow lists) in contrast to an evil out-group (trans people, snp, greens)to be hated and feared.
3 Create an escalating spiral of commitment, beginning with simple requests
(small donations, rally attendance).
4 Establish your credibility and attractiveness through myths and stories that can be passed from member to member.
5 Send members out to proselytising the unredeemed (campaign!)
6 Prevent members from thinking undesirable thoughts by
continually distracting them (with outrageous tweets or manufacturing fake news/science/incidents)
7 Dangle a notion of a promised land before the faithful (independence quickly, but only for true believers).
They go on to say, 'When it comes to teaching your social reality,
there is one additional point to keep in mind: repeat your message over and over again. [Supermajority;supermajority betrayed by Sturgeon; trans women are men; adult human female] Repetition makes the heart grow fonder and fiction, if heard/read frequently enough, can come to
sound like fact.
Cheers for reading.
Information from Steven Hassan, Harford Medical School.
(Noticed the mistake... that should read, "Harvard Medical School."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Wings is also berating ordinary people for having a bit of wit. The grifters Sheridan etc al have leeched off movements now to tge point most people understand their grift. And grassroots really are not transphobic.
These people went out to build a socially Conservative movement
and found out that Scotland really isn't as socially right wing as they thought.
What Wings failed to notice was the actual movement flooding the streets on Saturday, giving out well researched and put together literature.
Wings, Salmond, Sheridan Findlay etc al are more
than yesterday's people. They are bigoted dinosaurs who thought they could be dream twisters and inject their nastiness into something that was colourful, inclusive, positive.
What you hear from them isn't the sound of indy butterfly
The good thing is, that Sheridan and Salmond have exhausted the new following they got post 2014. There is nothing so exhausting than during each time Sheridan (and the everpresent swp) inserts himself into an organisation/movement/campaign, trying to explain to good people
just how divisive and awful this man is. Today's debacle on George Square has at last, shown good people who were caught in his gravity have managed to see through him and moved on.
The Indy movement really does not need misogynists or handsy men. It really is rejecting them
and seeing through their claims to unity and past victories.
We really must ensure these people can't wreck our movement, or aspects if it.
It really shouldn't be surprising that they have picked up transphobes (SNP hating Denise Findlay is an example of one) and rape
As others have said, the Cult of the Wings Over #Indyref mouth foamers, have looked shaky of late, turning in and on themselves. But. Again, as we've said, and others are now saying, the cult MUST be maintained, so just as religious cults do, political cults must make diverging
cult members extremely uncomfortable. With threats, and of course with their isolationist block lists. Scientology does this, jehovahs witnesses do this, as do other cultish religions. The cult must be pure. The power of the cult must be built, not weakened... And whatever
Alba members are complaining that some in the independence movement are gloating, because of their failure to win seats in the Scottish Parliament. In saying what I am saying, I am not gloating. To see this failure, and to see a few thousand activists who could be positively
active exploited in the way they have been, is actually gutting. Activism, protest, amplified voices CAN be used to bring about positive change. But we've all witnessed in the USA how radicalising prejudice misdirected anger is really dangerous... And ultimately impotent
except for those at the top of the tree. Salmond and others are exploiting and misdirecting people in a way that would make Steve Bannon and others like those who ran Cambridge Analytica, proud.
Personally, i felt it really was good to see yesterday's man, Salmond (and
Sam Hamad: "People think there's still an 'Israeli-Palestinian conflict'? Israel won the 'conflict' years, possibly decades, ago. There's simply the imprisonment of Gazans and the daily brutality of the occupation of those who live in the ever-shrinking West Bank. Israel's
strategy is now permanent occupation, incremental (though emboldened) cleansing and annexation.
Rocket attacks are acts of useless, essentially harmless defiance by oppressed peoples against a triumphant, untouchable enemy. Condemning these entirely harmless rocket
attacks if there was a deal just about to be signed for a two-state solution would make sense, but I actually think it's amazing that in recent years, given the hopelessness of the situation in Gaza, there hasn't been worse than rockets being unleashed against Israel.