This BBC article from March 2016 perfectly illustrates how they betrayed their viewers and their country over Brexit.
Energy Secretary, Amber Rudd, AND National Grid warn about Brexit, Energy prices & security of supply.
How does the Beeb report it?
1. The headline reports it as "a row" not what it is: a serious warning from serious experts.
2. First paragraph (in bold) is given to the leave supporters who dispute the claim.
3. They focus on the side issue: possible Russian gas restrictions, rather than the central...
issues; loss of access to implicit day ahead energy trading, and possible exclusion from EU solidarity mechanism.
(TBF, Rudd gave the BBC an opening to build that strawman, but, by golly, the grabbed the opportunity with both hands)
4. They give false equivalence
to the "leave supporters" and the National Grid & Energy Secretary. Who are these "leave supporters?". Are they experts? Engineers? Energy Economists? Academics? The Beeb doesn't say. But it gives these know-nothings the same status as the National Grid and Dept of Energy.
5. The BBC make NO EFFORT to look at the 2 opposing camps' workings. (A very detailed,thorough and clear study by the National Grid on the one hand vs a beer-belch of vacuuous assertion on the other, by...who knows?)
6. What passes for analysis is Clarksonesque "commonsense"...
dismisal of the experts' warnings "[increased costs] only likely if EU neighbours take decisions against their own best interests, like cutting off electricity interconnectors [ho ho ho]"
The net effect is to discredit the serious warnings of experts in the field and ...
provide reassurance to the BBC viewers that really all this "Brexit energy price rises / shortages" is all stuff and nonsense; calm down and vote leave!
Energy is just one area, but the BBC did this again and again on everything Brexit has touched.
It is time for a reckoning.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2015 the National Grid commissioned a study into potential effects of Brexit on Energy supply in the UK.
It was published in March 2016. vivideconomics.com/casestudy/the-… 1/
It formed the basis of their submission to the Energy and Climate Change Committee Inquiry: Leaving the EU: implications for UK energy policy.
Strangely, when I click on the link I get "Unfortunately the requested page was not found on our new website." And "We've found the former version of the page on the old version of our website. It is no longer updated, but you can use the link below to view it." 3/
@vivamjm
I've kinda assumed the reason Frostie delayed the SPS checks on EU imports again is because we haven't built the infrastructure and trained the people; just another case of "incompetent Tories couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery". What if it is more than that?
1/
What if it is actually an impossible task; that the nature of the imports actually makes it impossible? That it is feasible to do SPS checks on a dozen containers of frozen of lamb twice a year from New Zealand say, but it is just logistically impossible to do SPS checks on
2/
a mixed load of *fresh* chilled produce coming in on a ro-ro truck, half a dozen times a day? And that without even introducing full checks in Belfast and Larne yet, this EU border - handling imports for 1.8M people - was generating 25% of all "3rd country import" red tape
3/
...for which the net interest paid by the government is zero (it pays the interest to itself) and the other half is currently enjoying the lowest gilt yields in history, meaning the *cost* of our national debt is tge liwest it has been in 300 years.
Our £350Bn Covid debt (QE)
costs literally nothing.
The true Covid cost is the economic "scarring": how much has it *permanently* knocked off GDP?
Hey @bbclaurak@AndrewMarr9@robertpeston how long do you think you can keep your viewers in the dark as to the REAL reason for the UK's biggest Tax hike in 28 years?
Every tax hike, every spending cut is a Brexit tax or a Brexit cut. Caused by Boris's Botched Brexit
The Tufton St gang changed the EU question from the economy, NI peace, UK power/influence into one of sobwintee, Turks, and health tourism.
1/
They knew what the answers to the first set of questions would be.
Now, in the decarbonisation debate they do not want the question to be: "Heat-pumps vs boilers" or "EV's vs gas-guzzlers" or "Offshore aerogenerators vs gas-fired power stations".
In all 3 cases the...
2/
...green option is far better for air quality and UK jobs (not to mention CO2 emissions) and the UK economy.
EV's are already cheaper in TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) than gas-guzzlers
Renewables have become cheaper per KWh than gas power stations.