It's no longer Scottish Independence Bampotless Tuesday.
So here is a bampot.
It's really difficult to avoid thinking conspiracy theories about Mel and the accounts agreeing with her.
But let's come from the pov that she believes this shite. I'm not totally familiar
with Mel's history. I do remember engaging with her when I ran the SSP social media between late 2011- mid 2015. She was always a bit hyped up about things. Took weird angles. I took it to be that she was a recent Scot and had not lived in Scotland, or North of Watford, during
the Thatcher/Major Tory decimation of the North of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, or the total neglect of the Labour Party during their almost total control of our councils and the early days of the Scottish Parliament. She never experienced the poverty and
utter grim desolation of Sighthill, The Falls, Shankill, Leith, Manchester, Wigan, Londonderry, Cardiff, Newport, Irvine, Ardrossan or Wick.
Besides that, her attacks on the Scottish Government, @thesnp and @scottishgreens are odd, but mirror the odd assortment of bloggers who
built up cult followings following 18Sept '14.
Without being conspiratol, Mel has followed the curve of the odd wrong turns that ego and the need to create following /the need to be somebody that comes with the strange messianic complex many of these people seem to have. The
need to make more and more outrageous claims about our woman First Minister and the more and more fantastical claims about their intentions etc.
To be conspiratol, the odd thing about all of these people is that they seem to be moving people closer and closer to saying, "I
can't live in an independent Scotland, without my pure messianic representation being in control. And more and more if their following seem to be saying "we'll vote yoon next time because the snp are yoon..."
Isn't that odd?
Of course they'll say it's because the snp haven't
installed genital detectors in toilets, or jails or changing rooms... or that the snp haven't stormed the... eh, the... sorry, not sure where they are to storm... let Mel etc explain that.
But do you see what I'm saying? Mel, Wings, Jeggit, Barrhead Spanish boy, etc etc really
seem to be totally limited from the Scottish experience of the past 40 or so years. One in which anyone with any sense can see the imperfections in the present political settlement, but can also see how the SNP are mitigating as much as they can of awful Tory destruction and
Labour neglect of the past good few decades.
And these people want to suggest you vote Unionist. They actually have been, for a while now, suggesting we vote for the very parties that took our jobs and wealth and resources and snorted it and drank it and pissed it up the
shiny walls of the City of London. They are suggesting we vote for the oppressor or at least the parties who did little to mitigate the excesses of Thatcherite "unionism."
As someone brought up in Northern Ireland and has spent the past 30 years in the Central belt of
Scotland, these cultist messianic prices can fuck off and we'll do the lifting. We'll support the Government as it mitigates the worst excesses of the petite fascists in power, and the hand of friendship to the Tories Starmer is turning out to be (and the Tory enablers, the
Lib Dems, who enabled austerity, brexiting and now Thatcherite in jackboots in number10).
If these people are going to promote "vote yoon to get indy," they can get the fuck out of the movement.
Ungagged is made up
of political party members and non party members.
Onwards to independence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When I first arrived in Scotland, from Northern Ireland in 1993, I looked forward to voting for politics not poisoned by what Church your family went to. John Smith was the leader of the Labour Party and seemed to be a man who
was leading the party in a more pragmatic centre, but leftward direction. Then came Blair. I was a mature student at Stirling Uni. The floor I stayed on in Andrew Stewart Halls was perhaps, quite unusual, as it was very political and a melting pot of class... but
vastly working class. Represented there were SWP radical lefties, Militant Tendency left, centre left Labour Party, centre right Labour Party, SNP and Tory. I was definitely more attuned to the radical left, but selling papers, shouting slogans on the Link Bridge seemed
Guest Ungagger here in solidarity with prolific tweeter Neil, who gave us live coverage of the latest roaster spectacular 'Failure in Freedum Square'...so that we didn't have to. Thanks Neil 👌. On a serious note though, how sad is the place where we find ourselves now (thread)
How many of us looking on remembered 19th September 2014, the invasion of the unionist fash and their violent victory outing in that same square, then the resignation of Salmond as FM and we felt really hammered, bur there was a strong sense of solidarity..
Those post 18the Sept days were the absolute pits, but we bashed on best we could. Found our own activism; our voice in an online forum, or joined a party or pressure group. Now look at the betrayal by those absolute charlatans who profess to speak for us as a movement and weep..
1 feel listened to
2 grow a community
3 bring people together
4 sow discord amongst alienated people
5 pull alienated people together in cultist, right wing anger
6 create angry community
It is an incredible space to manipulate.
"Thought Reform" is on display on social media, constantly, injected in to movements in order to create discord and splits. To do this, the bad actors need to control the narrative and make people believe sometimes what was the opposite of what they once believed. Edward Hunter
came up with eight criteria to describe how totalitarian regimes/cults go about this.
1 Milieu control. The leader, or a select band, has complete control of information. Isolate people from outside information. People are taught to trust only the internal publications
Wings is also berating ordinary people for having a bit of wit. The grifters Sheridan etc al have leeched off movements now to tge point most people understand their grift. And grassroots really are not transphobic.
These people went out to build a socially Conservative movement
and found out that Scotland really isn't as socially right wing as they thought.
What Wings failed to notice was the actual movement flooding the streets on Saturday, giving out well researched and put together literature.
Wings, Salmond, Sheridan Findlay etc al are more
than yesterday's people. They are bigoted dinosaurs who thought they could be dream twisters and inject their nastiness into something that was colourful, inclusive, positive.
What you hear from them isn't the sound of indy butterfly
The good thing is, that Sheridan and Salmond have exhausted the new following they got post 2014. There is nothing so exhausting than during each time Sheridan (and the everpresent swp) inserts himself into an organisation/movement/campaign, trying to explain to good people
just how divisive and awful this man is. Today's debacle on George Square has at last, shown good people who were caught in his gravity have managed to see through him and moved on.
The Indy movement really does not need misogynists or handsy men. It really is rejecting them
and seeing through their claims to unity and past victories.
We really must ensure these people can't wreck our movement, or aspects if it.
It really shouldn't be surprising that they have picked up transphobes (SNP hating Denise Findlay is an example of one) and rape