The biggest current NFT collections are going to be bigger than all but a handful of any NFT collections that are going to be put together by the "TradArt" collectors incoming.
Why?
2/ There are multiple collections with market value today of $50M to $100M. Some of them even more maybe.
But for the purposes of this example, let's use $50M to $100M as a range.
How many TradArt billionaires are going to be ready to put $50M to $100M into NFTs today?
3/ My guess is "not very many". Keep in mind that most billionaires are illiquid. When you read that XYZ is worth $2B or $5B or $10B, do not imagine that this money is sitting in a bank account.
It is in stocks, bonds, partnership interests in funds, stock of private companies
3/ Let's say someone is worth $1B to take an 'entry level' billionaire and let's further assume they are 10% liquid (optimistic).
That is $100M. Will that person put $50M to $100M (50% to 100% of their liquidity) into NFTs?
LOL of course not, unless giga-ape (very unlikely)
4/ Even for a $5B-aire, with a few hundred millions of liquidity, chadding $100M of cold hard cash into JPGs in Sept 2021, well that is a bold call
Given that most are, umm, more mature in years, it is asking a mega mental leap to vaporize $100M of IRL wealth into JPGs
5/ Well, ok 6529, in a year it will be more validated and they will have an easier time doing so.
Sure, that is true. But also the prices might be up 2x or 5x (not financial advice obviously, just an example).
At which point you are asking the $1B-aire to invest $200M to $500M
6/ So my hot take here is that a substantial percentage of the mega OG collections have already been built by individuals and DAOs.
TradArt will add X additional collections, but it is not like they will add 95% of the future collections. Maybe 30-50%.
7/ Will TradArt buy individual expensive pieces? Yes
Will a super-billionaire put together a $200M collection? Yes
Will some nation-state make a $1B collection? Yes
But a much larger % than most think of the mega collections that will be made are already in existence today
8/ This thought did not occur to me until last week and it was trigged by a throw-away comment by @ac_collecting, but I think it is right.
Everyone is very excited about TradArt showing up and we welcome them to come.
But a lot of the major NFT stewards will be crypto-native
9/ We are already seeing that in hyper elite pieces - aliens, apes, grail fidenzas, grail squiggles, etc.
Very few are trading because buyers have not caught up with seller price expectations.
Multiple big offers have been rejected.
What will happen next?
10/ Well either the offers will go up and the grail end will re-rate or the buyers with their current buying budget will go down the spectrum a tiny bit and go for super-grails, not hyper-grails which *will* trade for these types of bids.
11/ This is the bull market case ofc.
Perhaps crypto and NFTs nuke and there are big buying opportunities for TradArt to swoop in.
But I don't think this is how it will go, because if it nukes, they will get more cautious, not less cautious and will miss again. :)
11/ It is a bullish tweetstorm about the high end of the market.
I am saying TradArt will not be able to afford all your bags, just a few 😉
2/ As always we need to look at both demand and supply.
Demand: Is it an appealing concept for a museum or collector to be able show each type of the iconic, first AB project?
I consider it one of the most obvious "yes-es" in on-chain generative art
3/ How about supply?
There are a theoretical 20 sets that can be built but many of those are vaulted already. I'll update my table later and post it, it is a mix of diamond hands and AB super-gurus (or both)
Won't be more than a handful of these ever built from today onward
It is hard to imagine a worse system for managing KYC than the current system of disclosing oodles and oodles of personal information (and photos) to the customer service reps of many different organizations
6529 has a significant IRL job. I have to do this weekly +/-.
It is the dumbest thing in the world, as if there were not 100 better ways to confirm my residency / identity than sending utility bills (home address), ID numbers, photos etc to hundreds of people / year
To take the dumbest example, confirming that you are a resident of country X is a different question than "what is your home address and how many kwh of electricity or BTUs of gas you use"
The fin svcs firms need the former, not the latter
This is a very short thread, but something that has been bothering me since the spring and I think I now have an initial point of view on it
6529 does not yet own any metaverse land (decentraland, sonmium, etc) bc I had some concerns I had to work through
2/ Concern 1: I don't understand conceptually why metaverse land should be scarce from a consumer product market fit perspective.
I get that, say, decentraland limits land to make number go up, but the marginal cost of metaverse land is zero and we need to bring 1B ppl onboard
3/ So I think, basically, any metaverse that limits land to some artificially small amount will eventually be outcompeted by a metaverse that onboards tens or hundreds of billions of people for close to free
And that is likely to be a centralized institution which is bad