This is an increasingly common misinterpretation of the left-right political spectrum among right-wingers. It puts both communism and fascism on the far left because they're "authoritarian". The further right you go, the more freedom you have
This of course is not how the spectrum works. The concept of a political left and right traces back to the French Revolution when those who supported the monarchy sat on the right of the president of the National Assembly, and those who supported the revolution sat on the left
In contemporary usage, the left is commonly associated with "big government" such as greater regulation of business, while the right is often thought of as championing personal liberties. Like anti-maskers
But even that is debatable, for example the right-wing view on abortion and same-sex marriage. Also a fascist government combining authoritarianism with left-wing economics would be difficult to place
The political compass is considered more accurate for this reason, as it uses two axes instead of just one
Also political parties and their supporters often judge their place on the spectrum in comparison to other parties in their country. In both America and Malaysia, both sides are very firmly on the right, ideologically speaking
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hand fans of various shapes existed around the world since ancient times, but if you mean the folding fans that often have batik designs, they were invented in early medieval Japan and spread throughout Southeast Asia via China
Despite being essentially a foreign adoption, the folding fan was popular enough that it became a part of the culture in every Southeast Asian country, even reaching as far as Bengal, making it truly pan-Asian. Today they're usually only seen in classical dances
Folding fans became popular in 17th century Europe, especially among women. I can only assume it was because of western pop culture that the fan is often mistaken as being exclusively feminine, even among westernised Asians
Let's take a look at #RayaAndTheLastDragon, the influences and inspirations that went into its setting, my thoughts on the Southeast Asian theme, and my view of the criticisms against it. I'm writing this from memory so I might've forgotten or overlooked stuff
First off, this is not a review. I enjoyed the movie and I liked the ending song, but I also felt the plot was linear and most of the supporting characters were extended gags with little to no development
I won't be talking about the quality of the movie, just the setting. I haven't read about its production, and I tried to avoid seeing too many opinions other than what appeared on my Facebook feed. So everything here is just me, for better or worse
If Malaysians know one thing about local history, it's the beloved tale of why the constitution grants special privileges to "natives". What's less well known is that the mainstream narrative is very one-sided
The story goes that Malays fought for independence from the British, but non-Malays begged for citizenship. Malays were forced by the Brits to accept the immigrants, but were given special privileges in exchange. This is what the right means when they tell you to belajar sejarah
In the first place, we would've had a non-Malay population even if we had never been colonised. They were here before the colonists, and even those who arrived during the colonial era weren't as unwelcome as the right would like to believe
Duli has absolutely no relation to Arabic. It comes from the Sanskrit dhuli meaning dust or ash. This is mentioned in the video, but an additional Arabic connection was tacked on from nowhere
"Yang Maha Mulia" is what it sounds like. Again, this refers to the ruler himself, not God. The notion that "maha" must be solely reserved for God is very, very recent and has never been a Malay tradition. Not even after the introduction of Islam. Never
Paduka is a type of shoe from ancient India, deriving from the Sanskrit word for foot. In South and Southeast Asian cultures, touching a person's foot or shoe was among the highest forms of respect. The significance of the paduka can be seen here
Besides the points made in this thread, it's also worth noting that the separation of man from nature occurs in Malay mythology as well. Several Malay legends speak of a time when humans could communicate with animals and trees
In some stories, the trees imparted knowledge, only a portion of which was passed down. This has been noted as an allusion to pagan animism, when humans learned from the natural environment rather than religion