The biggest challenge in convincing teachers to stop averaging scores over time and, instead, use recent and consistent evidence to determine a final grade isn't actually in convincing them the practice is more sound and equitable.
The challenge is much more concerning.
1/9
Most teachers can quickly see the positive effect this type of assessment practice has on the accuracy of grades, the effect on the student, and the increase in equitable reporting (and the effect on motivation this results in).
That's not the hold up.
2/9
The hold up is often phrased as confusion about how this would work or concern about how students would view practice and if they would do it, but let's translate that to what it really means, what we're really saying when we give that as our reason not to change.
3/9
The issue is that it requires teachers to give up their "grades as control" mentality. It takes away the stick that many classrooms use to force compliance, and many teachers refuse to do that. The short-term benefits of compliance and control are given priority.
4/9
I don't say this to bash Ts who are nervous about changing grading practices. That fear is absolutely well-founded. Without implementing certain practices or making certain changes to how we teach, taking away the stick will, sadly, result in chaos if nothing else changes.
5/9
But please know that it can work. It will take time. There will be setbacks. There will be frustration. On the other end of that, though, is an absolutely incredibly classroom. That one you've always dreamed of where kids understand what, why, and how to learn.
6/9
That authoritarian classroom, that power dynamic we force with traditional (read, counting everything in the grade book to use it as a forcer of compliance) grading – that feels safe, it feels comfortable.
But, does it truly feel good?
7/9
When students complain about grades they feel they have no control over, does that feel how you want it to?
When students only care about completing all the work, checking all the boxes, but they never talk or ask about learning, is that what we want?
8/9
Here's my challenge when it comes to grading:
Don't settle for mediocrity, for the status quo, because you're nervous about what it takes to aim for greatness.
It's not easy. It's not always pretty.
It's so absolutely worth it, though.
9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is one of my favorite ways to help students distinguish thematic statements from summaries and evaluations. It uses a variation of inductive learning, and I pair it with direct instruction after. Here's the activity (explanation to follow): docs.google.com/document/d/1Cc…
1/
It starts by my handing out the cards and asking students to create three piles based on similarities they see in the type of information communicated in the sentence on the card. This usually takes a lot of questions in the small groups to get them going down the right road.
2/
(Side note: I love seeing some of the other patterns students notice. I celebrate them intentionally.)
Students end up with a pile of summaries, evaluations, and thematic statements. Their next step is to use the examples to come up with their own definition for each.
3/
We had our first mastery check today for a skill (pretty much just a diagnostic), and there was something that really stood out to me.
1) Every single student who asked if it was graded had demonstrated an earlier level of understand (translates to "missed more questions").
1/
Getting to tell them that it wasn't graded and that as long as they grew we would leave this all behind us was so helpful. I could physically see a couple of them release their stress/worry about their score.
Not a single student who demonstrated later...
2/
levels of understanding asked if it was graded. In thinking about this, it really drove home the point that the value of grades is primarily driven by fear. Students spend the majority of the time thinking about grades only fearing the points they might lose.
3/
One of my favorite classroom activities is called "Stronger and Clearer Each Time" from Jeff Zwiers.
Here's why I love it: 1. Kids learn to strengthen their ideas through collaboration 2. Kids get to walk away feeling confident 3. It emphasizes the value of revision
1/
The idea behind it is that every student starts by responding to a prompt. Then they take that and have a series of one-on-one conversations where they swap ideas, evidence, and support, adding it to their own ideas to strengthen them.
2/
The piece I love about it is how often I see students start really hesitant or anxious about sharing their ideas, but by the end they get to walk away feeling confident in their ability to share an idea verbally.
3/
I've given a survey to now thousands of kids in multiple districts that have asked me to work with them around assessment and grading.
Here are the questions: 1. Do grades help you learn? 2. How do grades make you feel? 3. Why do teachers give grades?
A thread...
1/
"Do grades help you learn?"
The most common answer is, unsurprisingly, no. Students are very aware that "grades are just there to show all the work you've been doing." They get it, and they sadly get it more often than teachers do. They know it's about compliance.
2/
The second most common answer is also no, but for a different reason. Students say grades "make you lose motivation when you see an F" or "bring your confidence wayyyy down" or "super stress me out to the point that I give up."
I think a lot about the messages we unintentionally send to students with various grading practices. Here are a few that always stand out to me.
A thread...
1/
First off, organizing a grade book by tasks. Simply doing so identifies what we are communicating is the most important aspect of "learning." We are telling students that their grade is a direct representation of the things they do, not the learning they've engaged in.
2/
Another that gets me is holding students accountable for every assignment. You can preach growth mindset all you want, but if kids are held accountable for everything, we are telling them that there's no room for failure and that success is a product of not messing up ever.
3/
Professional learning in most schools rarely meets the needs of educators. It's one-size-fits all with maybe a sprinkling of teacher ownership thrown in to check the "teacher-driven" box. That's not cutting it. It never will. It's past time for something better.
A thread...
1/
To start with, it often misses the mark because no one can clearly articulate what the mark is. What is the vision of meaningful, high-quality teaching and learning at the school? I'm not talking about the stupid evaluation rubric. I'm talking about an energy-filled, ...
2/
concise, and student-focused description of what teaching and learning could be. How do you know if you have that? When you read it and can feel it on an emotional level. I should be excited after reading that, and that's what needs to drive PD. Sadly, doesn't happen often.
3/