A short thread on *trust* in the classroom: why we need it and how teachers can build it.
↓
For pupils, the value of what they learn is nebulous and highly delayed.
As teachers, we continually require pupils to have faith that the objects we ask them to attend to and the decisions we make on their behalf will pay off for them further down the line.
When trust is present, pupils will readily embrace teacher suggestions about where to allocate their attention and effort.
When trust is absent, pupils can view teacher direction as an inconvenience, or even with suspicion, and ultimately reject it altogether.
As a teacher, status is something you get bestowed upon you by the school, whereas trust is something you must earn from your pupils.
We can earn trust by demonstrating:
1. Credibility 2. Consistency 3. Care
→ Credibility (Is my teacher knowledgeable enough to lead me in the right direction?)
Showcase your accomplishments and expertise, in the curriculum and beyond. Get others they trust to vouch for you.
→ Consistency (Is my teacher predictable and fair?)
Be transparent in your values and expectations. Communicate them regularly and ensure they align with your actions. Exhibit steadfast emotional stability.
→ Care (Does my teacher understand and look out for me?)
Take visible action to show your pupils that you know them, you are on their side, and you have their interests at heart.
As Roosevelt once said: “kids don't care what you know until they know that you care.”
Trust takes time to earn and discipline to keep. But as any experienced hand will tell you: it’s worth it.
The classroom is so much more impactful and enjoyable when pupils have confidence in their teacher.
👊
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We are heavily influenced by the behaviour and attitudes of others. The effect is particularly powerful when a large proportion of a group act in a similar way.
→ These unwritten rules of conduct are known as 'norms' and they play a HUGE role in school.
🧵...
First, let's take a step back. Why do norms exist?
Firstly, an ‘imitation’ shortcut to behaviour makes sense from a risk point of view—if those around us are doing it, it can’t be all that bad a bet, right?
Secondly, conformity is a critical pre-condition for large group co-operation. Working together at scale can supercharge our individual and collective success.
But these things are only possible when the behaviour of individuals within a community is consistent and predictable.
The cue that kickstarts a routine is also critical (see linked 🧵). Effective cues are:
Distinct → So they don't get mixed up with other routines
Multi-modal → They combine noise/speech with action/position
Punchy → They are quick and impactful
However, they take time and effort to establish, and often come with an initial dip in performance. During this phase, it can be tempting to give up.
→ This is what @JamesClear calls the 'Valley of Latent Potential'.
🧵...
At their best, routines can:
→ Redeploy attention
→ Reduce behaviour management
→ Increase student motivation, confidence and safety
→ Free up of teacher mental capacity to monitor learning and be more responsive
However, these benefits only come once routines become automated.
The amount of time it takes for a routine to automate depends on its complexity and how frequently we run it. Simple routines can take 20 repetitions. More complex ones can take up to 200.