It's been 6 days since POLITICO reporter @SchreckReports published a new book verifying the key emails from Hunter's laptop, including Joe's role in the China deal.

Not one outlet that spread the CIA lie that it was Russian disinformation (except POLITICO) has even mentioned it.
That means that CNN, NBC News, MSNBC, PBS, @HuffPost, @TheIntercept and so many others spent weeks before the 2020 election spreading what they know is a lie from CIA.

And now that there's new proof from a mainstream reporter that they lied, they won't even mention that.
The most damaging and aggressive agents of disinformation in the United States are large corporate media outlets.

All journalists make mistakes. The way to know that they're deliberate disinformation agents is when they ignore evidence that they lied. That shows it's purposeful.
Other than the short note from his own outlet, the only mainstream outlet that mentioned this news was when CBS stuck it on their digital platform (but not TV).

Everyone at the outlets that spread the pre-election CIA lie don't want you to hear this & don't want to mention it:
To see what liberal corporate media outlets really are, do this thought experiment:

Imagine if Schreckinger's book had proved the Biden emails were *forged* instead of verifying them.

He'd be all over the place instead of ignored. That's how you know they lie on purpose.
It's fine if people think I'm fixated on this. I am.

CIA invented an outright lie before the election -- to protect Biden and help him win. Almost every major liberal corporate outlet spread it. Big Tech censored the reporting.

And now a new book proves it was a total lie.
This, though, is what gives me hope. @rustyrockets took my Substack reporting on the indictment of Hillary's lawyer and what it shows about the lies of corporate outlets. He produced a short YouTube video report. In 3 days, it has almost 2 million views:

Just that segment alone -- after 3 days, with no corporate backing -- is almost 4 times larger than Don Lemon's audience. It's twice as large as Chris Hayes or Joy Reid's Comcast shows. And I'll bet the number of people under 55 watching is more than 10 times what those shows get
This is why employees of media corporations with the job title "journalist" so desperately agitate for more online censorship. They know they'll have no audience unless it's a captive one, and they know they will be exposed if dissent from their lies and propaganda can be heard.
As I noted yesterday, Russell Brand produced a viral video which, citing the revelations from the indictment of Hillary's lawyer, cast doubt on the Russiagate conspiracy and documented the media's deceitful behavior in unity with the DNC and security state. Look what happened:👇
This industry rag compiled random tweets from fanatical liberals to depict Brand as literally insane, desperate for money, part of QAnon, and just otherwise morally repellent.

This is what the media does to anyone who dissents from liberal orthodoxy:

thewrap.com/russell-brand-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

29 Sep
Just the latest episode in an endless line proving that the leading agitators for more censorship -- the prime enemies of free discourse in the US -- are employees of corporate media outlets. They don't just approve of the huge censorship wave. They're angry more isn't censored. Image
The fact that we're so accustomed to corporate journalists being the leading activists *for censorship* has normalized it and obscured how utterly warped and sick it is.

As I've said before, it'd be as if the leading cheerleaders for more cigarette smoking were cardiologists.
The only thing creepier than corporate journalists leading the demands for more online censorship by Big Tech is that the majority party in the DC is constantly issuing dictates to tech monopolies demanding more political censorship:

Read 5 tweets
29 Sep
Aside from the sick sadism in this headline -- you can feel the arousal at the idea of stripping one's political opponents of their jobs in the middle of a pandemic -- it's premised on an absolute lie about who the unvaccinated are.
Who are the unvaccinated in America that sociopaths like @AmandaMarcotte are so eager to punish and strip of their livelihood? It's not who that headline claims:

greenwald.substack.com/p/an-nba-star-… Image
Liberals give themselves license to erase any people of color that get in the way of their narrative.

They erased massive Latino & Black (& female) Bernie support to push the Bernie Bro narrative.

Now they disappear all the Black/Latino vaccine-hesitant people to push this lie: Image
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
Oh my. 😬

Regardless of anything else, it's completely obnoxious and manipulative to suggest that only anti-Semitism could explain opposition to funding Israel's military. There's nothing anti-Semitic about saying: let Israel fund their own military, not US taxpayers.
There are parts of the right very steadfast about objecting to attempts to convert every political disagreement into accusations of racism, misogyny, etc, yet then do precisely that by weaponizing "anti-Semitism" accusations against their adversaries in the Israel debate.
Some police defenders and immigration opponents are racist but not most or all.

Some critics of #MeToo are misogynistic but not most or all.

Some critics of Israel are anti-Semitic but not most or all.

Etc. etc.
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
For many Democrats, there is one political issue and only one: Trump. He is the beginning, the middle and end. They demand every discussion of everything place him at the center. And the outcome is demented behavior like support for Liz Cheney:
So many liberal media stars are in full-on propaganda mode to generate affection and sympathy for Liz Cheney. @Yamiche makes no mention of her defense of torture or other things that would enrage liberals (abortion opposition) but highlights this shtick:

Which of these national politicians was the first to publicly advocate marriage equality for gay men and lesbians?
Read 9 tweets
27 Sep
CIA and Mike Pompeo were stopped by WH lawyers from carrying out their plot to kidnap or assassinate Assange, but the US Govt continues to slowly kill him instead. In 2019 - 2 years ago - doctors warned that what they were doing to him was killing him:

nytimes.com/2019/11/25/wor…
In January, a UK judge rejected the US request to extradite Assange solely on the grounds that his health could not withstand it. Despite this, the Biden DOJ ignored all press freedom groups, appealed that, and demanded he stay in prison pending appeal.

nytimes.com/2021/02/08/us/…
The US Government is slowly suffocating, silencing and killing someone solely for the crime of reporting documents that every major media outlet in the world determined were newsworthy, and few in the US corporate press care because he's never been in their clique.
Read 7 tweets
26 Sep
Great and very important report by three @YahooNews journalist on how CIA spent years plotting against WikiLeaks, including with plans to kidnap or even kill Assange. Mike Pompeo was the key driver. He has snowed many MAGA people: he's pure Deep State.

news.yahoo.com/kidnapping-ass…
The reporting also uncovers a CIA plot under Obama -- during the height of the Snowden reporting -- to classify myself, Laura Poitras and Assange as "information brokers" rather than journalists to justify surveillance of us and even imprisonment, rejected by the Obama DOJ.
Note that the theory the CIA at the highest levels invoked to justify spying on and even prosecuting Laura Poitras, myself and Assange -- we're something other than "journalists" -- is the one Brazil used to try to imprison me in 2020 and Biden DOJ is using against Assange now.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(