For many Democrats, there is one political issue and only one: Trump. He is the beginning, the middle and end. They demand every discussion of everything place him at the center. And the outcome is demented behavior like support for Liz Cheney:
So many liberal media stars are in full-on propaganda mode to generate affection and sympathy for Liz Cheney. @Yamiche makes no mention of her defense of torture or other things that would enrage liberals (abortion opposition) but highlights this shtick:
Which of these national politicians was the first to publicly advocate marriage equality for gay men and lesbians?
As a follow up: which of these national politicians was the last to publicly advocate marriage equality for gay men and lesbians? 🌈
Hint for those struggling:
Answer to the above poll question:
The first of the 4 to advocate for gay and lesbian marriage equality was Dick Cheney (2000, 2004, 2009).
The second was Joe Biden (May, 2012).
The third was Obama (days after Biden).
The last was Hillary Clinton (March, 2013). 🌈
Despite being last -- not just of these 4 but among the last national Democrats -- Hillary's 2016 campaign produced ads depicting her as some sort of courageous pioneer in the fight for marriage equality.
"That's our gal!" 🏳️🌈
Many saying Dick Cheney "only" was first because his daughter is gay:
1) It's good when people's life experiences fosters empathy.
2) Liz Cheney used anti-gay themes in 2013 to win even though her sister is gay.
3) Dick, despite marriage equality support, is a war criminal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's been 6 days since POLITICO reporter @SchreckReports published a new book verifying the key emails from Hunter's laptop, including Joe's role in the China deal.
Not one outlet that spread the CIA lie that it was Russian disinformation (except POLITICO) has even mentioned it.
That means that CNN, NBC News, MSNBC, PBS, @HuffPost, @theintercept and so many others spent weeks before the 2020 election spreading what they know is a lie from CIA.
And now that there's new proof from a mainstream reporter that they lied, they won't even mention that.
The most damaging and aggressive agents of disinformation in the United States are large corporate media outlets.
All journalists make mistakes. The way to know that they're deliberate disinformation agents is when they ignore evidence that they lied. That shows it's purposeful.
Regardless of anything else, it's completely obnoxious and manipulative to suggest that only anti-Semitism could explain opposition to funding Israel's military. There's nothing anti-Semitic about saying: let Israel fund their own military, not US taxpayers.
There are parts of the right very steadfast about objecting to attempts to convert every political disagreement into accusations of racism, misogyny, etc, yet then do precisely that by weaponizing "anti-Semitism" accusations against their adversaries in the Israel debate.
Some police defenders and immigration opponents are racist but not most or all.
Some critics of #MeToo are misogynistic but not most or all.
Some critics of Israel are anti-Semitic but not most or all.
CIA and Mike Pompeo were stopped by WH lawyers from carrying out their plot to kidnap or assassinate Assange, but the US Govt continues to slowly kill him instead. In 2019 - 2 years ago - doctors warned that what they were doing to him was killing him:
In January, a UK judge rejected the US request to extradite Assange solely on the grounds that his health could not withstand it. Despite this, the Biden DOJ ignored all press freedom groups, appealed that, and demanded he stay in prison pending appeal.
The US Government is slowly suffocating, silencing and killing someone solely for the crime of reporting documents that every major media outlet in the world determined were newsworthy, and few in the US corporate press care because he's never been in their clique.
Great and very important report by three @YahooNews journalist on how CIA spent years plotting against WikiLeaks, including with plans to kidnap or even kill Assange. Mike Pompeo was the key driver. He has snowed many MAGA people: he's pure Deep State.
The reporting also uncovers a CIA plot under Obama -- during the height of the Snowden reporting -- to classify myself, Laura Poitras and Assange as "information brokers" rather than journalists to justify surveillance of us and even imprisonment, rejected by the Obama DOJ.
Note that the theory the CIA at the highest levels invoked to justify spying on and even prosecuting Laura Poitras, myself and Assange -- we're something other than "journalists" -- is the one Brazil used to try to imprison me in 2020 and Biden DOJ is using against Assange now.
In June, the always-wrong herd animals employed by liberal media corporations mocked those, begun by @DarrenJBeattie, who reported the FBI's role in Jan 6 -- just as they mocked those who said the same about the Gov. Whitmer plot (confirmed by BuzzFeed):
Throughout the first War on Terror, the FBI was at the center of many if not most of the scary domestic terror plots it accused young US Muslims of fomenting (it was FBI that created and directed those to keep fear levels high), just as they're doing now:
AOC's statement is barely comprehensible in the English language. It's like a parody of the worst excesses of modern left-wing discourse: social justice phrases and self-aggrandizing grievances randomly strewn together amidst classic AOC self-victimization about trauma and pain.
I mean, seriously: what the fuck is this and what does it mean?