Stock price expectations in #uranium and selecting outperformers from here:
A) overpromotion and hence high expectations priced in leads to underperformance
B) underpromotion moving to promotion and broker coverage leads to outperformance
C) the better project matrix + promotion.
A) overpromotion and hence high expectations priced in leads to underperformance
B) underpromotion moving to promotion and broker coverage leads to outperformance
C) the better project matrix + promotion.
...... Leads to outperformance
D) over promoted + below average project matrix + high expectations leads to underperformance
E) accelerating promotion, coupled with 1st tier project matrix coupled with ETF triple entry leads to massive outperformance.
#uranium
D) over promoted + below average project matrix + high expectations leads to underperformance
E) accelerating promotion, coupled with 1st tier project matrix coupled with ETF triple entry leads to massive outperformance.
#uranium
For some time now, ego on individual #uranium stock names appears to be blinkering reality:
A) AISC of <$30 is great Vs >$50
B) 80% of the cycle is governed by the spot move, not promotor mgmt.
C) Low capex intensity is much better than high
D) low expectations + achievement =
A) AISC of <$30 is great Vs >$50
B) 80% of the cycle is governed by the spot move, not promotor mgmt.
C) Low capex intensity is much better than high
D) low expectations + achievement =
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
