2. I have talked a lot about the "intentionally late gambit" for crushing the RVOs, particularly for the conventional ethanol mandate. Biden EPA could clearly use this for cutting 2020 RVO by arguing compliance is late. Probably do so for 2021. But 2022?
3. Since the leaked RVOs included substantial cuts to the conventional mandate for all three years for 2021-2022, I no longer think this is the justification being used to crush the RVOs for all three years. Instead, they went were even the Trump EPA dared not tread.
4. The most logical explanation for cutting RVOs for all three years is what I call the "little reset" provision in the RFS statutes. The "big reset" is much better known. This is the reset of volumes after 2022 based on broad criteria.
5. The little reset allows a mandate to be written down if it has been cut by 20 % in 2 consecutive years or 50% in one year, but only starting in 2016. Gonna be a legal war over whether you can really apply this to the conventional ethanol mandate.
6. This is my best guess about what the Biden EPA is trying to use to crush the RVOs for 2020-2022. I honestly cannot think of any other way to justify crushing all three years at this point in time. Always room to be surprised on the RFS though.
7. #grassleyrule under real stress right now in the #RFSwars. Personally, I am truly stunned that the Biden Admin would go down this road on the RFS. As I said before, they must really, really, really hate corn farmers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Weekend Reading: As they used to say on Monty Python, "...and now for something completely different. A couple of years ago I wrote a paper with this title, "Writing Papers in Economics Using Fake Latex." The article is real. Here is the link onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
2. The back story for the paper will provide some insights into how faddish and tribal academics can be. Most people outside academics will be surprised how influential the physical appearance of a paper can be to other academics.
3. The "cool kids" in economics and lots of other STEM fields write papers in something called LaTeX. It was originally designed for desktop publishing, and I will be the first to admit that papers produced using this platform have a pleasing aesthetic appearance.
1. Further confirmation that the leaked RVO numbers last week were real. This is quite a statement even considering how ferocious past battles in the #RFSwars have been.
2. Assuming the leaked numbers were right (at least at the time), I am still trying to figure out the political calculus of Biden Admin in going so anti-ag on the RVOs. Whatever your personal views on the RFS, the leaked proposal is indeed the worst ever from perspective of ag
3. Think about that. By all appearances, the Biden Admin is attacking the RFS more aggressively than even the Trump Admin. Who had that on their bingo card? I certainly did not.
1. Article contained a quote about corn prices going under $4 next year. Some clarification will be helpful. I don't think that will happen until summer 2022 at the earliest. Obviously weather dependent as well.
2. My thinking is that there is going to be a major global acreage response to the current high grain prices, even considering the ongoing run up in input costs. Land prices and rents going up is the norm as grain prices go up. Other inputs too.
3. Market analysts, myself included, were surprised by the muted acreage response to the higher grain prices in 2021. Maybe I will be wrong again, but history suggests a strong US acreage response in 2022. Maybe 183 million acres + combined US corn/soy planted acreage.
1. Put together this handy cheat sheet for the leaked RFS RVO numbers in the @OPISBiofuels article this morning. Also included the current "final" RVOs for 2020 and the "timecopped" adjusted RVO for 2020 (h/t to Rinny for always have the pithiest description!)
@OPISBiofuels 2. The only bone thrown out to ag is the increase in the advanced to 6.7 billion gallons in 2022. One way to benchmark these numbers is to compare the total RVO to the 20.09 total RVO currently on the books for 2020: -2.96BG in 2020, -1.462BG in 2021, & +0.675BG in 2022.
@OPISBiofuels 3. Using the current 2020 total RVO as the benchmark, the leaked RVOs for 2020-2020 result in a total RVO cut of 3.747 billion gallons. Would have to go back to check for sure, but think it would make the Biden Admin a bigger chopper of the RFS than even the Trump Admin.
@OPISBiofuels 2. According to OPIS "The volume totals were 12.5 billion gal of conventional fuel in 2020
-- well below the previously finalized 15.0 billion gal -- 13.453 billion gal in 2021 and 14.096 billion gal in 2022."
@OPISBiofuels 3. Assuming these are accurate, a whole host of issues raised. First, how can you ex post justify cutting a previously finalized RVO by 2.5 billion gallons? Did they go whole hog on the "compliance is not finalized/intentionally late legal gambit"?
1. With #pft21 in full swing this week, thought it would be a good time to share something I have been digging into on corn yields: wildfires. You read that right: wildfires. Lots of smoke and haze around this summer and we know photosynthesis needs energy from the sun.
2. I want to begin with a foundational fact about corn yields that I learned from the great Ken Cassman, now retired from Agronomy Dept. at Univ of NE. He was kind enough to exchange emails with me awhile back and instruct me on some corn yield basics.
3. This is from a 2010 book chapter that Ken co-authored. The right panel shows the strong relationship between the total solar radiation absorbed by the corn plant post-silking and yield. Note high R2