so I guess I have a new rabbit hole to look down into
thoughts and prayers appreciated
so first things first, "inverted" is this community's own vocabulary word for the worldwide conspiracy of secretly trans folks who rule the world
and this community (which reminds me a *lot* of SRA in the way they talk) believes basically EVERYONE is secretly trans
this is fringe but not as fringe as you might like
this thought leader has 12k followers and clearly didn't get them from followback trains
they're big fans of 'gait' as evidence, because they apparently think women all walk like runway models and men all walk like cowboys
also worth noting that this is the first conspiracy theory I've seen in a long while that seems to be absolutely incompatible with QAnon, because they preach that the Trumps are also inverted Baphomet worshipers
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's do a little Media Analysis on the incredible Brietbart op-ed from a couple weeks ago. patreon.com/posts/democrat…
On September 10, Breitbart published a remarkable op-ed claiming that Democrats were using reverse-psychology on Trump-loving Republicans in order to trick them into *not* getting vaccinated. By telling them to get vaccinated. breitbart.com/entertainment/…
I also couldn’t stop thinking about this piece after I read it, but not because I was offended by the premise.
Instead, I was fascinated by the piece precisely because I knew I wasn’t the intended audience for it. Nolte wasn't trying to convince *me* of anything.
Noelle pointed me to the FB of one of the January 6th, defendants, Tammy Bronsburg, where she's been watching Ted Gunderson's old presentations about the "tunnels" under the McMartin School.
Crypto, like gold, isn't really so much a currency. It's a commodity. Its value is based less on what it can buy and more on how many people want to own it and stockpile it.
People in crypto are always shouting HODL (their meme version of 'hold') because if people sell, supply would go up, value would go down, and their own stockpile would be worth less.
As the day has gone on, QAnon is doing what it always does: slowly rewriting events in a never-ending game of telephone.
Popular additions to the story today are "Lin Wood sent an ambulance to try to rescue her" and "she had ivermectin at home and was trying to get to it."
As soon as a new part of the story is accepted as true, someone else builds on it or changes it slightly to see whether this will also be accepted as true. QAnon has always done this, building their narrative by consensus.
Within three minutes, a different Anon "confirms" the new story that Veronica has been getting ivermectin at the hospital, and it was working, but then they stopped giving it to her because reasons.
Any Anon reading the thread will likely believe this forever.
Followup posts on Telegram clarify that Veronica's husband is NOT the person with medical PoA. This detail of her story seems important: did she give PoA to someone because her husband is not a Q believer, or for some other reason?
News articles from the past few days don't really illuminate the matter. It was reported on NBC 5 Chicago that Lawrence, her husband, told their reporter that Veronica was requesting ivermectin, but no one asked Lawrence what he thought? nbcchicago.com/news/local/ami…
Meanwhile, QAnon believers who followed Lin Wood's call to action and went to the hospital complained he was rude and had asked them to leave.
Again, is this because he was dealing with more than he could handle or because he doesn't like them?