One of the main reasons for Tencent’s 40% share price decline since February, is the CCP’s crackdowns on the gaming industry.
1/
The crackdown includes a restriction for all minors ‘under 18’ being limited to only 3 hours of playing video games per week.
They have 1 hour on Friday, Saturday & Sunday between 8-9pm, which is being monitored by a face scan from gaming companies such as $TCEHY
2/
At first, this seemed like horrible news for Tencent and the media has loved to make it seem that way.
However, after taking a deeper look I think the impact to $TCEHY is actually quite minimal.
3/
$TCEHY reported that only ~6% of revenues come from minors.
But let’s be more pessimistic & assume there are accounts lying about their age. Let’s say ~20% of gaming revenue from China is being completely removed.
20% is likely a huge overstatement but let’s roll with it
4/
79% of gaming revenue in 2020 came from China. So 21% of those revenues are not impacted.
~36% of Tencent’s total revenues come from gaming.
So if we take ~$82B (USD) LTM revenues for Tencent. $29.5B came from gaming. $6.2B of which was outside of China.
5/
Therefore ~$23.3B of revenues is being impacted by the gaming crackdown from the CCP.
If we take the overly pessimistic 20% number away, that is $4.7B of revenue lost.
If Tencent 6% number is accurate, then it’s only $1.4B.
6/
so if Tencent’s reported number is accurate then the crackdown impacts just 1.7% of total revenues.
Being overly pessimistic and taking the adjusted 20% of China gaming revenues being minors, then 5.7% of total revenues are impacted.
7/
it’s also important to note that a large portion of the gaming investments in Tencent’s portfolio don’t contribute to revenues and are outside of China.
8/
Overall, the gaming regulations have barely put a dent in the intrinsic value of $TCEHY.
Of course it’s unwanted, but with only 1-5% of revenues being impacted whilst they have a 20-30% CAGR and an investment portfolio worth $200B+ .. it barely hurts the business.
9/ disclosure: long $TCEHY
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't personally use or follow a strict checklist. I certainly don't think it could be used as a screening tool. But here are some general criteria I like to see in an investment.
1/ A founder-led/owner operator business with high insider ownership & a focus on long-term, intrinsic value per share growth. Ideally I'd like the CEO to have a majority of their net worth invested in the company.
2/ A sustainable competitive advantage & moat. Preferably in an industry with high barriers of entry, a low cost production advantage & pricing power. Ideally they are able to disrupt the industry.
Thread/ $HIFS - A high quality, small-cap bank with exceptional management.
1/ Hingham Institution for Savings was founded in 1834 as a mutual savings bank in Boston, Massachusetts. It eventually listed in 1988.
2/ $HIFS currently have 11 locations, 8 of which are in the South Shore of Massachusetts. The have also recently expanded into Washington D.C in which management recognise as a similar market and a growth opportunity.
3/ Currently $HIFS has a market cap of $680M. Since 1993 when the Gaughen family took full control of the bank, the stock has returned 100-1 for shareholders. Pretty impressive considering how small the company still is.
Thread/ $BABA news on the CCP breaking up Alipay lending business.
1/ The media and fintwit are again jumping on the news and pushing an overly negative spin on the impact of the CCP breaking up the Ant Group’s credit/lending business.
2/ it was announced that the CCP plans to break up Ant Group's Alipay and create a separate app for the loans business, the Financial Times reported.
3/ The plan will also result in Ant turning over the user data that underpins lending decisions to a new credit scoring joint-venture that will be partly state-owned.
$BABA returns on incremental invested capital (ROIIC) over past 9yrs is ~18%. Over the past 3yrs it was ~19%. Reinvestment rate over the same time periods was 130% & 102%. That has lead to intrinsic value compounding of 23% & 19% respectively
1/ With Alibaba Cloud requiring a lot of capital and just beginning to approach profitability, I have no reason to believe $BABA won't maintain a similar reinvestment rate & returns over the next 5 years..
2/ The core commerce business will continue to be extremely profitable and produce strong cash flows & returns for the business. I think it's hard to argue otherwise, regardless of any upcoming government crackdowns & interventions.
Alibaba cloud is arguably the most bullish aspect of the $BABA thesis even though it’s <10% of FY21 total revenues and not yet profitable. Currently they have ~40% of cloud market share in China.
1/ The cloud market in China is only in early stages of development. They are approximately 5-6 years behind the US if they can replicate the same growth trends that a company like $AMZN has been able to achieve with AWS.
2/ the US and Chinese cloud market is very different and not a perfect comparison. But $AMZN & $BABA are the dominant players in each market so I will make some comparisons throughout the thread.
$SHVA operates payments systems for debit cards and mobile payments (Apple & Google pay) in Israel. If it traded on any major exchange would likely be >2x the current price.
1/ first note is that $V & $MA are not competition. They don’t compete in the market and actually own ~10% of $SHVA shares each. The company was founded by Israeli banks.
2/ Shares are very illiquid. Large share holders such as the banks, Visa & MasterCard own ~60% of the company. The illiquidity is the main reason the company trades and such low multiples. Trading on Tel Aviv stock exchange doesn’t help either.