Thread/

$TCEHY & the gaming crackdown in China.

One of the main reasons for Tencent’s 40% share price decline since February, is the CCP’s crackdowns on the gaming industry.
1/

The crackdown includes a restriction for all minors ‘under 18’ being limited to only 3 hours of playing video games per week.

They have 1 hour on Friday, Saturday & Sunday between 8-9pm, which is being monitored by a face scan from gaming companies such as $TCEHY
2/

At first, this seemed like horrible news for Tencent and the media has loved to make it seem that way.

However, after taking a deeper look I think the impact to $TCEHY is actually quite minimal.
3/

$TCEHY reported that only ~6% of revenues come from minors.

But let’s be more pessimistic & assume there are accounts lying about their age. Let’s say ~20% of gaming revenue from China is being completely removed.

20% is likely a huge overstatement but let’s roll with it
4/

79% of gaming revenue in 2020 came from China. So 21% of those revenues are not impacted.

~36% of Tencent’s total revenues come from gaming.

So if we take ~$82B (USD) LTM revenues for Tencent. $29.5B came from gaming. $6.2B of which was outside of China.
5/

Therefore ~$23.3B of revenues is being impacted by the gaming crackdown from the CCP.

If we take the overly pessimistic 20% number away, that is $4.7B of revenue lost.

If Tencent 6% number is accurate, then it’s only $1.4B.
6/

so if Tencent’s reported number is accurate then the crackdown impacts just 1.7% of total revenues.

Being overly pessimistic and taking the adjusted 20% of China gaming revenues being minors, then 5.7% of total revenues are impacted.
7/

it’s also important to note that a large portion of the gaming investments in Tencent’s portfolio don’t contribute to revenues and are outside of China.
8/

Overall, the gaming regulations have barely put a dent in the intrinsic value of $TCEHY.

Of course it’s unwanted, but with only 1-5% of revenues being impacted whilst they have a 20-30% CAGR and an investment portfolio worth $200B+ .. it barely hurts the business.
9/ disclosure: long $TCEHY

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Frank Taber

Frank Taber Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @frankinvesting

17 Sep
Thread/ 5 investing 'checklist' items.

I don't personally use or follow a strict checklist. I certainly don't think it could be used as a screening tool. But here are some general criteria I like to see in an investment.
1/ A founder-led/owner operator business with high insider ownership & a focus on long-term, intrinsic value per share growth. Ideally I'd like the CEO to have a majority of their net worth invested in the company.
2/ A sustainable competitive advantage & moat. Preferably in an industry with high barriers of entry, a low cost production advantage & pricing power. Ideally they are able to disrupt the industry.
Read 6 tweets
14 Sep
Thread/ $HIFS - A high quality, small-cap bank with exceptional management.

1/ Hingham Institution for Savings was founded in 1834 as a mutual savings bank in Boston, Massachusetts. It eventually listed in 1988.
2/ $HIFS currently have 11 locations, 8 of which are in the South Shore of Massachusetts. The have also recently expanded into Washington D.C in which management recognise as a similar market and a growth opportunity.
3/ Currently $HIFS has a market cap of $680M. Since 1993 when the Gaughen family took full control of the bank, the stock has returned 100-1 for shareholders. Pretty impressive considering how small the company still is.
Read 14 tweets
13 Sep
Thread/ $BABA news on the CCP breaking up Alipay lending business.

1/ The media and fintwit are again jumping on the news and pushing an overly negative spin on the impact of the CCP breaking up the Ant Group’s credit/lending business.
2/ it was announced that the CCP plans to break up Ant Group's Alipay and create a separate app for the loans business, the Financial Times reported.
3/ The plan will also result in Ant turning over the user data that underpins lending decisions to a new credit scoring joint-venture that will be partly state-owned.
Read 16 tweets
10 Sep
Short thread/ $BABA future returns

$BABA returns on incremental invested capital (ROIIC) over past 9yrs is ~18%. Over the past 3yrs it was ~19%. Reinvestment rate over the same time periods was 130% & 102%. That has lead to intrinsic value compounding of 23% & 19% respectively
1/ With Alibaba Cloud requiring a lot of capital and just beginning to approach profitability, I have no reason to believe $BABA won't maintain a similar reinvestment rate & returns over the next 5 years..
2/ The core commerce business will continue to be extremely profitable and produce strong cash flows & returns for the business. I think it's hard to argue otherwise, regardless of any upcoming government crackdowns & interventions.
Read 6 tweets
7 Sep
Thread/ $BABA & the value Alibaba Cloud

Alibaba cloud is arguably the most bullish aspect of the $BABA thesis even though it’s <10% of FY21 total revenues and not yet profitable. Currently they have ~40% of cloud market share in China.
1/ The cloud market in China is only in early stages of development. They are approximately 5-6 years behind the US if they can replicate the same growth trends that a company like $AMZN has been able to achieve with AWS.
2/ the US and Chinese cloud market is very different and not a perfect comparison. But $AMZN & $BABA are the dominant players in each market so I will make some comparisons throughout the thread.
Read 12 tweets
5 Sep
Thread/ the Israeli micro-cap version of $V & $MA

$SHVA operates payments systems for debit cards and mobile payments (Apple & Google pay) in Israel. If it traded on any major exchange would likely be >2x the current price.
1/ first note is that $V & $MA are not competition. They don’t compete in the market and actually own ~10% of $SHVA shares each. The company was founded by Israeli banks.
2/ Shares are very illiquid. Large share holders such as the banks, Visa & MasterCard own ~60% of the company. The illiquidity is the main reason the company trades and such low multiples. Trading on Tel Aviv stock exchange doesn’t help either.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(