It is a formula to destroy the country and civilization. No major country has succeeded by converting the entire population to a foreign language. India won’t either.
How is State turning schools to English-medium "parents deciding"? How is the State forcing the Supreme Court, most High Courts, IIM's, IITs, AIIMS being in English "parents deciding"? The colonial state imposes English, leaving parents with little choice.
These are such tired arguments. Read a book. Here's one. Indian does not need one language, less than 5% of people migrate out of the State they are born in.
Question is, can a child in Tamil Nadu decide to be a doctor using Tamil, serve her village?
This one chart destroys argument that "examples of Japan, France, Germany, don't work."
Migration patterns in India are similar to all of Europe. Child in every state can learn in their language to the highest level. Don't need to force medium-change.
Absolutely, why not. Every IIT can have a stream with an option of state language. Why not actually let students choose instead of forcing one language on them.
1. Only 4% of Indians migrate out of state 2. The language of learning does not have to be the same as communication language. 3. When you move, you can learn a language to communicate, but concepts are best learnt in MT.
English-medium is the *reason* for not finding jobs. When I hire an engineer, I want to test their understanding of programming, couldn't care less for their English.
Many engineers coming out of English-medium are incompetent and unemployable.
Who is saying one professor must teach in 10 languages? Let the professor teach in a language most comfortable to them. Let the students study in the language most comfortable to them. We have enough people, and institutes, for this to be possible.
Please see one of the most celebrated Science professors in India, Prof H C Verma, speak about this.
I hired programmers in Microsoft US from Russia. Some didn't speak any English (I used an interpreter). Great techies and hires. Over time, picked up functional English as needed .
Is forcing 1.3 billion people to learn in a foreign language "practical"?
Let's solve the 96% problem first. You want hold 96% hostage to the 4%?
Why is it that you don't want a child in a village in Tamil Nadu to learn to be a doctor using Tamil, as a child in a Japanese village can in Japanese (and go to win a Nobel)?
People are responding to the policies of the colonial state. Yes, in the linguistic apartheid state they don't see any options. I am speaking of dismantling the apartheid state which has been holding India back for decades.
Also I wouldn't put much credence to the sarkari Andhra survey by a govt which had pre-decided the answer. For other motives, including that it helps facilitate conversion.
You are mixing up issues.
1. Firstly English-medium is not a "global necessity." Most of the developed world does not use English-medium.
2. Children learn best in their own language.
3. How best to maximize india's talent, given its diversity.
"Global market" needs English-medium? 😆😆 Someone forget to tell the Chinese they need to switch to English-medium since they are so lagging behind India in globalization.
India's English delusion is due to Indian State policies, not "global" needs.
Yes, because their "belief" in English is not scientific. It is not based on knowledge but on ignorance of how the world works and the brainwashing and bad policies of the Indian State.
That's why I call it a "myth." अंग्रेज़ी माध्यम का भ्रमजाल।
It's funny how many self-professed "Hindutva" is actually wannabe-Angrez. With little understanding of culture, civilization or even economics of the world.
They say "vishwa guru" but their highest dream is for the country to be "vishwa coolie." 😆
If you are counting on call centers for your employment, don't worry, the Chinese programmers, who study in Chinese-medium, are writing chatbots to replace you soon enough.
A big underlying assumption coming from Abrahamic-origin thinking is the myth of linear progress. Ancient inventions are scoffed at is because they violate the idea of linear progress.
But is progress really linear? Do new generation always build on the knowledge of old? 1/
If you look at nature, everything is cyclical. Life is cyclical, seasons, growth of plants, water cycle, planetary orbits. There is no linearity. We talk of economic cycles. Is knowledge linear or cyclical. What is its periodicity?
Pyramids were built perhaps 5000 years ago.
Now, whenever the pyramids were built, it is clear that later generations did not know how they were built. The Egyptians of 1000 years ago could not build the pyramids nor did they know how they were built. Scientists still don't know fully.
Hardly want to send any views to the propaganda site Wire, but this article is hilarious in its contortions at Islamic hagiography (is this a full time occupation of “South Asian Studies” now?)
First they argue that Mughal Temple destruction was due to “secular” reasons… 1/
Then @CMarrewa spins away all that to claim how tolerant Mughals were in giving grants to the Nath Yogis.
When it is evident even in her examples that this is not due to any “religious ecumenism” but wanting favors like cures (Mercury concoctions.)
2/
Naths were powerful, both as ascetics and as a militant force. Mughals were currying favor with them with grants while they destroyed other Hindu temples when they could.
This doesn’t make the Mughals “great”, they were simply trying to ingratiate themselves.
These are largely toxic front organizations with no community support. Attacking “Hindutva” by these toxic front orgs is a fig-leaf for the eradication of Hindus which is part of the agenda of religious and cultural imperialism that the likes of @CMarrewa support.
Read "The Compromised Campus." A lot of the "area studies" departments were setup with State Department assistance as a way to "study" the other for imperial utility.