CJI NV Ramana led 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court to hear the curative petition against its 3-judge verdict of 2019 which upheld Adani Power's termination of the Power Purchase Agreement with Gujarat Urja Vikas Ltd(GUVL) #SupremeCourt
On Sept 17, #SupremeCourt issued notice in GUVL's curative petition against the 2019 verdict favoring #Adani Power
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Apologies My Lord we didn't see the bench had assembled
Sr Adv Aryama Sundaram states he appears for petitioners
Sr Adv Harish Salve appear for respondents
AG Venugopal: There is an office report which says two respondents have been served but it's not necessary since they did not participate in hearing in #SupremeCourt at early stage
CJI: service not complete on Respondent 2, 3 and 5
AG: 2 is regulatory commission.
CJI: 3 is consumer education society, A is amar singh and 5 is Anil Ojha
AG: 3 and 5 can be struck off
CJI: We are deleting then 3 and 5 as suggested by AG. Notice served to 4 but they did not appear
Salve: We are for Respondent 1 and we were served notice 3 days ago
AG: I am ready to argue
Salve: we need to put in a reply
AG: then we need time to file rejoinder
Salve: We need three weeks for counter
CJI: 3 weeks is till Oct 22 and rejoinder can be thereafter. We can list on Nov 9?
Rohatgi: Can be listed on Nov 16
CJI: 3 weeks granted for reply and thereafter 2 weeks for rejoinder. List on Nov 16. We will constitute bench and hear without adjournments then
CJ Patel: I am issuing notice today. I want suggestions from all respondents in short bullet points. For checking at courts, everybody is in a hurry, so how do we work around that?
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing plea by Attorney General K K Venugopal against the Bombay HC judgement which held that sexual assault offences under the #POCSO would not be attracted if there was no direct 'skin to skin' contact between the accused and the child #SkinToSkin
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by a Noida resident against inconvenience caused to commuters between Noida and Delhi due to blockage of roads by protesters against Farm Laws #FarmersProtest
Justice SK Kaul: Mr Nataraj (ASG) what are you doing ?
ASG: We convened a meeting.
SC: we laid down a law and how to implement the law is your business. The court has no means to implement it
SG: It is the duty of executive to implement it
SC: if we encroached then you will say we trespassed into executive domain. This has ramifications.. there are grievances which can be addressed. But this cannot be a perpetual problem.
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing plea by Attorney General KK Venugopal against the Bombay High Court decision stating that 'skin to skin' contact was necessary for offence of 'sexual assault' under POCSO Act.
Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra: Out of the four Petitions, before the Court, I appear for the Legal Services Authority. I have also brought on record the trial court records.
#SupremeCourt resumes hearing petitions seeking the regulation of firecrackers and ban on the manufacture of firecrackers containing harmful chemicals such as barium nitrate #firecrackers
Justice MR Shah peruses the earlier orders passed in the case.
Justice Shah: we have recieved the prelimiary enquiry by CBI , in many items Barium has been found. Why should not your licenses be cancelled ? (to Hindustan firecrackers, etc)
Sr Adv Kiran Suri : we don't know what is there in the report
Petitioner Srivari Dadaa tells CJI NV Ramana led bench: Please listen to facts of case with patience
CJI NV Ramana: if you are a Balaji devotee then you must be patient. everyday you cannot threaten registry to list the petition. This is not done. we are all devotees of balaji
CJI: Can we interfere in puja and how it has to be conducted. this is not Kachherhri court that you can say whatever you want
Dadaa: its about fundamental right
CJI: How to conduct pooja is a fundamental rights?
CJI to respondent: It is said that there are certain irregularities in conducting pooja. We are all devotees of puja and we all expect that the Devasthanam will take care of traditions and perform all ritual and customs. what happened to the petitioners representation then?