really interesting from @so_says_sally (and not just cos she quotes me) .. my experience a decade ago from @DefraGovUK was that it was really hard to get @DHSCgovuk out of its health service silo and interested in wider policy
so its great news they are now interested in air quality (they weren't then); we tried to interest DH as was in fuel poverty (hypothermia kills) - no interest. So I think there is scope for depts realising benefits where there are real synergies
the problems for a line dept come where their cross-cutting priority cuts across a departmental priority and they need to persuade it to go in another direction..
that is where they need oomph from the SoS, central backing and real persistence to make anything happen. Otherwise they are just forced back to the levers they control... But its a v important issue, so lets hope this works..
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
the new Levelling Up taskforce under Andy Haldane is interesting for govt structure nerds (and an interesting contrast to govt structures for #netzero) @CommonsBEIS
Haldane is perm sec for 6 months (levelling up will take longer than that .. but first focus will be on working out what this means...) reporting jointly to Michael Gove and the PM.
The people working for him will be (I understand) a joint team from @cabinetofficeuk and the new DLUHC. not cleat how they relate to the delivery unit (but until we know what LU is...they can't do that much)
On business frustration in the noughties at increasing red tape - but also concern it was not just Brussels to blame
.@britishchambers had an impartial stance in the referendum - but that was broken when its Director-General came out for Leave - and catapulted Adam into the leadership
we start with the role the debate about Europe played in the 2014 independence referendum
Gethins was elected to Westminster in the SNP sweep in 2015 ... and spoke straight away on the EU referendum..but the govt did not engage at all with the SNP over the terms of that referendum - wonder if David Cameron regrets not taking those amendments?
Interesting to see the outrage at how the govt has gone about deciding the health and social care levy package which suggests people don't understand how tax policy gets made in the UK govt
In a way this was exceptional, because it looks as though this may have been a three way decision, involving the Health Secretary as well... normally any tax decision is a Chancellor-PM bilateral at best
Cabinet not consulted in advance? well at least this time they knew it was under discussion and could have made representations... for a normal Budget they are presented with the fait accompli on the morning when all the docs are printed
.@instituteforgov has published a paper by Lee Cain on reforming the govt communications service...it offers a fascinating insight into the Cummings/Cain approach to govt ..he makes the case for the plans they had for massive centralisation of govt comms
Today's vote on the aid cut cannot undo the damage a hastily implemented cut has wrought on the UK aid programme. Programmes abandoned midway through. Contracts broken. People laid off. Morale hit. Reputation damaged.
if the government really wants to move to a lower aid spend through this Parliament, as is now clear from its motion, it should have had the honesty to legislate in advance to amend the act setting out the 0.7% target
and then it should have implemented the cut in a sensible value for money way -- rather than slamming on the brakes, pretending this was a short-term move - but now admitting it isn't.