But I don't think there's any point in going for the US national government. It is on track to notch world-historical defeats on both economic and military matters. Capturing it is catching a falling knife. Instead, focus on DAOs and startup cities worldwide.
If you believe the premises, you believe the conclusion.
What's up? Tech, Bitcoin, China, India.
What's down? US economic, military, and demographic predominance.
Christian Brose is the former Staff Director of the Senate Armed Services Committee. By his own account he could see every line item of America's $700B defense budget, including all the confidential bits.
Over the last 30 years, the American foreign policy establishment has blown perhaps the biggest lead in human history. From the hyperpower that wins everywhere without fighting, to a declining power that fights everywhere without winning.
The domestic economic situation is more mixed, because the rise of tech was a strong point for the US.
But now a big group doesn't want immigrants, and another group is hostile to entrepreneurs, so on the margins the immigrant entrepreneurs will start companies elsewhere.
The US national government is what so many are fixated on, but what if it's actually a MacGuffin? What if it's a white elephant, if the game isn't worth the candle?
And while everyone has been fighting over it, what if billions have been building the future abroad and online?
You only take on a turnaround if it's actually possible to turn the thing around. If it's headed into the ground at a thousand miles per hour, at a trillion dollars per quarter, you just do what you can to plan for the crash.
One last point.
It's hard to go from 0-100. Tech companies, cryptocurrencies, & startup cities give the necessary experience to run network states.
Btw, great turnarounds do happen. They aren't impossible.
But the US federal government's current combination of world-historical incompetence and ostensible omnipotence is an unstable state. One way or another, there will be a new equilibrium.
"Swallowing the fait-accompli may become the leitmotif of U.S. decline even though acceptable political rhetoric will never allow it to be confessed openly." issforum.org/roundtables/po…
Maier: "In the long run the US is unlikely to overcome the assertiveness of China...Rather than insisting on global leadership, the task of the US should be to manage America’s relative decline in a multipolar system without military conflict." issforum.org/roundtables/po…
When you hear the alternative view, you realize why you don't hear the alternative view.
The numbers are the raw data
Dashboards are presentations thereof
Subjective text accompanies dashboards
Monetizable actions alongside that text
Seems obvious, and already happening, yet also an important lens on what useful information looks like.
Newspapers usually leave their call to action implicit. But it's often "get angry at this guy", then "subscribe now".
The alternative concept of calls-to-action alongside dashboards is interesting. Every action recommended would be explicit, vetted, and possibly monetized.
Imagine if local governments began looking at the histogram of net worth of their population every day, calculated in an opt-in/privacy-protecting way.
Not just the median, the whole distribution.
Not just the income, the savings minus debt.
1) Fintech apps already have much of this data 2) States like Estonia & Singapore have national ID systems via e-identity & Singpass that can serve as primary key 3) Histograms can be calculated in privacy-preserving way, eg: link.springer.com/article/10.114…
Our current metrics for society are bad because they are easily gamed and aren't granular enough.
Society doesn't necessarily prosper as a whole if the stock market goes up. But it would if the (inflation-adjusted) net worth histogram was right-shifted.
Concept: what if your community newspaper was re-centered around a community dashboard?
It addresses the ADD aspect of news judgment. Rather than random stories every day, your community would instead track metrics over time, like $ saved or time working out. And improve them.
Any company beyond a certain scale has a set of dashboards that the CEO and all execs review each day. Examples below.
The point of tracking metrics over time, and centering the morning on them, is that it gives long-term memory and focus.
The day doesn't start with random stories from a newspaper. The day starts with visualizing shared long-term goals, and tracking actions against those goals.
Just repeat what everyone else is saying. If it's proven wrong, well, everyone was wrong together. The establishment's consensus algorithm. Works until falsified by the outside world.
When is the School of Fish Strategy less effective?
In engineering, business, and war. The ability to manufacture consensus *within* your social network only partially overlaps with the skills necessary to build products, sell products, and win wars.
Consensus is still fairly important in those areas. You do need to manage teams.
But it's related to the distinction between political truths and technical truths. Is it true if others think it’s true? Or is it true regardless of what people think?