Thread by @MouseInTheCourt

I’m observing a Met Disciplinary hearing today:
“it is alleged that DCI Mason (then DS Mason) asked the victim inappropriate questions about her personal life, relationships and whether she would like to go for dinner that evening.”

I’ve been taken to a room and am watching the hearing via a video feed.

The sound keeps cutting out and is practically unwatchable.

The feed went blank midway through prosc reply. @metpoliceuk how is this Open Justice? #secretcourt

DCI James Mason alleged to have said “you still look amazingly hot” in an email to robbery victim.

Also alleged to have said the victim is now at his “top spot as my favourite Camden victim of crime” and to have told her “if you ever fancy a drink with a very discreet police officer let me know”

The sound feed to the room lags the video by 80 seconds so when the chair cuts the link to this remote viewing room we lose the last 1m20 of submissions. Our Usher reports this has been the case “for maybe 2 years” @metpoliceuk

We were told that the victim was mugged in 2011 while on her way to buy ingredients for dinner. While taking her witness statement DCI Mason is said to have asked her out for Chinese food “I’m fairly sure it was Chinese”. Was it an off the cuff remark? “No, definitely not”

Asked why she didn’t report it “if you get a man on your side you get the support that you need” … “I didn’t quite realise the significance (of the comment) until…” sound cuts off

The victim, whose identity is protected, cites the #metoo movement allowing “women to speak out and not be laughed at”. At the time she felt a “very independent and powerful women, now I realise I was incredibly vulnerable”

The hearing resumed at 12.08. A light has started flickering in this remote viewing room. Combined with the audio problems reporting is becoming increasingly difficult

The court heard directly from DCI James Mason. He's 43 and joined the Met Police in 1999. Starting at Belgravia station he joined Hackney as a DS approx "4 or 5 years later". We hear he has worked for the counter terrorism unit, becoming a DCI in 2017.

And we hear he worked as a "staff officer" for Cressida Dick before joining the flying squad which is where he is now.

DCI Mason is asked about his question of "do you have a boyfriend" reportedly asked to the victim in the Robbery Squad Office. He says it's "very much an ordinary question to ask who is at the home address" citing general welfare considerations

Would it have been unusual for officers to have stopped off on the way home to allow the victim to collect food. Answer: no, his officers "are very aware of the best local eateries, particularly Chinese"... "it's part of victim care"

DCI Mason asked how he feels about the e-mails he sent. "I'm embarrassed, ashamed at the pathetic and nauseating nature of them. It gives me no pleasure to hear them read back"

DCI Mason says he "accepts full responsibility for what he has done" ... " I offer an unreserved apology to the Met, to my colleagues and [the victim]"

DCI Mason tells the hearing that his "personal understanding of the imbalance of power" has lead to recognising "how uncomfortable" and the "huge ramifications"the victim must have felt

Asked how his conduct has been since the incident DCI Mason says “it has been exemplary”…”I have worked in a number of roles that require the highest level of professionalism”

We resumed after lunch at 14.18. The ‘prosecution’ (if that’s the right word in this environment), explains that as 95% of the facts are agreed the only issue for the tribunal is whether this is misconduct or gross misconduct

He invited the panel to consider the witness evidence of the victim “credible” and “it’s understandable why she did not make a prompt complaint”… “she had just experienced a violent act” having been robbed by four youths on bikes

He added “this is not the sort of case where you can say it was acceptable behaviour at the time”

The defence say “they do not seek to say she is not a credible witness” but that the victim “had contact with a number of officers that day” and could have been mistaken as to who invited her for a Chinese meal

The defence invites the panel to find plain misconduct saying that “whilst he has always accepted he has breached professional standards” … “he is clearly an officer who has conducted his duties to a very high standard”. Refer to 7 character statements from fellow officers

A finding of misconduct would mean DCI Mason could not be posted to his next promotion and would prevent involvement in the 2022 and 2023 selection process, the defence tells the hearing

The tribunal has adjourned to consider their findings. Due to the time lag the last 80 seconds of each session is cut off so we don’t know what indication of time the panel gave.

Watch this space

It has now been two hours since the tribunal adjourned and no updates on timing have been given to the public gallery.

Our usher has to leave at 5 and she’s having great difficulty getting through to anyone in the main building to find cover.

It's now been three hours of us staring at a screen stating "This session is currently in recess".

The usher has not been able to get hold of anyone.

We have no idea what's going on.

The tribunal may have already gone home ???

Yep, the tribunal had gone home.

We were kept waiting in a sealed room for 4 hours.

What a waste of time.

Update: Mr Christopher McKay, chair of the panel, issues verbal statement apologising for failure to inform public gallery the court had adjourned.

He says he can "assure any members of public that a note has been taken of this situation".

A note. Goodo.

Meanwhile a heavily watered down @metpoliceuk press release has been issued, seemingly devoid of any tangible details.

DCI James Mason, was found to have committed Gross Misconduct and given a three-year written warning.

news.met.police.uk/news/met-offic…

unroll please @threadreaderapp