WTO members met again as the intellectual property council today, both formally and informally.

BOTTOM LINE:

One year after it was proposed, NO CHANGE IN POSITIONS on the proposal to waive some intellectual property protection for COVID-19,

#TRIPSWaiver stalemate

1/7 Image
Stalemate should come as no surprise.

FOR—suspending protection will allow countries to copy vaccines and other products

AGAINST—other solutions are effective, protection is needed as incentives for innovation, no evidence that a #TRIPSWaiver will help transfer technology

2/7
More interesting (1)—the US

According to sources: US said

• it appreciated both sides’ efforts
• members should focus only on vaccines to ensure consensus
• seek solutions likely to gain consensus

Does that signal the US’ own position?

3/7 #TRIPSWaiver
More interesting (2)—chairs versus members

Chair Amb. Dagfinn Sørli (Norway) asked for members’ advice on how to break the stalemate.

Some of them had a suggestion …

4/7 #TRIPSWaiver (WTO photo) Image
… Some delegations said Sørli should talk to Amb. David Walker (NZ, coordinating work on a broader response to COVID-19) and Amb. Dacio Castillo (Honduras, WTO General Council chair)

He replied that this missed the point: it’s up to the members and no one else

5/7 #TRIPSWaiver Image
Sørli will report on the stalemate to the General Council later this week.

Small group meetings involving key players are often used to try to break a deadlock. Most recently Sørli held small group meetings on Sept 23 and 29

6/7 #TRIPSwaiver Image
WTO news on intellectual property, health, the waiver and other issues: wto.org/english/news_e…

What is in the “revised waiver request”? See this⬇️, which includes some analysis and assessments

7/7 #TRIPSWaiver

tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/05/25/wto…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Ungphakorn

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CoppetainPU

1 Oct
1/4. OK, congratulations to the small but élite number who answered the two quiz-poll questions.

You have been very consistent. Well done

Unlike some.

Results:

Q1 (left) how many WTO members listed?
Q2 (right) how many in the services regulation talks listed?

But ... ImageImage
2/4. The official answer to Q1 is:

The number of WTO members listed = 28 (the EU + 27 member states). Most answered correctly

3/4. But the official answer to Q2 is:

The number of participants in the services regulation talks listed = 27

That's right. 27. Even though the EU is itself on the list, it's told the WTO that the count must be 27.

Why the WTO has agreed is a mystery

Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
TWO QUIZZES coming up

This is a list of @wto members. There are 164 of them.

1/4 wto.org/english/thewto…
Includes: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, EU, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden

How many @wto members?
These ⬇️ are the participants in the @wto talks on domestic regulation in services

2/4 Image
Read 5 tweets
29 Sep
This is indeed important news.

Some additional points

1. These are talks among a subset of the @wto membership—a “plurilateral” involving 65 of the 164 members—a negotiation among the willing. It’s seen as a way of getting around the consensus rule.

Who are the 65?

1/9
The 65 participants are ⬇️

Latest to join: Singapore

The US is not listed but is reported to be ready to join.

2/9 wto.org/english/news_e…
2. There has been some opposition from India, South Africa and some others who complain that deals among only some members violate the “multilateral” principle of the WTO.

But may be difficult for them to block this one. It all depends on the details

3/9 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/02/22/ind…
Read 10 tweets
28 Sep
1/5

The @wto #PublicForum began today.

In 2 months—the WTO #MinisterialConference.

A hot topic for both—#WTOreform.

Perversely, @BobWolfeSPS and I say forget “WTO reform”.

It puts the focus on Geneva, when the real problem is in and between capitals.

claireberlinski.substack.com/p/the-world-tr…
2/5 The most serious problems are well-known:

•Crisis in dispute settlement
•Inability to meet halfway in crucial negotiations

Where is the leadership?

claireberlinski.substack.com/p/the-world-tr… (@cosmo_globalist)
3/5 Where is the leadership?

The US pays lip-service to solutions with nothing concrete.

China hides behind developing country alliances.

The EU is trying, but has its own pre-occupations.

claireberlinski.substack.com/p/the-world-tr… (@cosmo_globalist)
Read 5 tweets
26 Sep
Final results are out now.

1. Tax initiative: rejected by 64.9% v 35.1% of votes, 23 v 0 cantons.

2. Same sex marriage: accepted 64.1% v 35.9% of votes. (Cantonal majority not needed)

#SwissVote

1/5
1. Tax initiative—results by canton

#SwissVote

2/5 swissinfo.ch/eng/results-of…
Tax initiative—results by commune

Only a handful of communes were "for" (blue) mainly in urban areas of Lausanne, Basel, Biel/Bienne, Bern, Zurich plus a few others

3/5 rts.ch/info/suisse/12…
Read 5 tweets
24 Sep
Sunday: 3rd nationwide Swiss votes of 2021

• “Marriage for all” (same-sex marriage allowed)
• Increased tax on income from capital (Not sure Swissinfo’s right to say “capital gains”)

Support down for both. “Marriage” set to pass; “tax” to fail

1/2 swissinfo.ch/eng/vote-poll-…
Official background docs

🇨🇭 Federal brochure
FR vd.ch/fileadmin/user…
DE vd.ch/fileadmin/user…
IT vd.ch/fileadmin/user…

Other docs, videos, etc (FR) vd.ch/themes/etat-dr…

2/2
TODAY’S #SwissVotes:

(1) The initiative to tax income from capital has been overwhelmingly rejected.

Although some votes are still being counted, and the results from some cantons are not complete, a majority of cantons (18.5) has already rejected this.

swissinfo.ch/eng/results-of… Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(