FOR—suspending protection will allow countries to copy vaccines and other products
AGAINST—other solutions are effective, protection is needed as incentives for innovation, no evidence that a #TRIPSWaiver will help transfer technology
2/7
More interesting (1)—the US
According to sources: US said
• it appreciated both sides’ efforts
• members should focus only on vaccines to ensure consensus
• seek solutions likely to gain consensus
… Some delegations said Sørli should talk to Amb. David Walker (NZ, coordinating work on a broader response to COVID-19) and Amb. Dacio Castillo (Honduras, WTO General Council chair)
He replied that this missed the point: it’s up to the members and no one else
1. These are talks among a subset of the @wto membership—a “plurilateral” involving 65 of the 164 members—a negotiation among the willing. It’s seen as a way of getting around the consensus rule.
2. There has been some opposition from India, South Africa and some others who complain that deals among only some members violate the “multilateral” principle of the WTO.
But may be difficult for them to block this one. It all depends on the details
(1) The initiative to tax income from capital has been overwhelmingly rejected.
Although some votes are still being counted, and the results from some cantons are not complete, a majority of cantons (18.5) has already rejected this.